Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

ABSTRACT: Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

PROVIDER: PRJNA801506 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR17803871_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR17803872_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 2 of 2

Similar Datasets

Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Project description:State-of-the-art algorithms for m6A detection and quantification via nanopore direct RNA sequencing have been continuously developed, little is known about their capacities and limitations, which makes a comprehensive assessment in urgent need. Therefore, we performed comprehensive benchmarking of 10 computational tools relying on current-based and base-calling “errors” strategies for m6A detection by nanopore sequencing.

2023-03-01 | GSE195618 | GEO

Systematic comparison of tools used for m<sup>6</sup>A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

Project description:N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been increasingly recognized as a new and important regulator of gene expression. To date, transcriptome-wide m6A detection primarily relies on well-established methods using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. However, direct RNA sequencing (DRS) using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform has recently emerged as a promising alternative method to study m6A. While multiple computational tools are being developed to facilitate the direct detection of nucleotide modifications, little is known about the capabilities and limitations of these tools. Here, we systematically compare ten tools used for mapping m6A from ONT DRS data. We find that most tools present a trade-off between precision and recall, and integrating results from multiple tools greatly improve performance. Using a negative control could improve precision by subtracting certain intrinsic bias. We also observed variation in detection capabilities and quantitative information among motifs, and identified sequencing depth and m6A stoichiometry as potential factors affecting performance. Our study provides insight into the computational tools currently used for mapping m6A based on ONT DRS data and highlights the potential for further improving these tools, which may serve as the basis for future research.

| S-EPMC10076423 | biostudies-literature

Systematic evaluation of NIPT aneuploidy detection software tools with clinically validated NIPT samples

Project description:Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a powerful screening method for fetal aneuploidy detection, relying on laboratory and computational analysis of cell-free DNA. Although several published computational NIPT analysis tools are available, no comprehensive and direct accuracy evaluations of these tools is published. Here, we evaluate and determine the precision of five commonly used computational NIPT aneuploidy analysis tools, considering diverse sequencing depth (coverage), arbitrary sequencing read placement, and fetal DNA fraction on clinically validated NIPT samples.

| EGAS00001005323 | EGA

Nanopore direct RNA seq-based basecalling of m6A

Project description:Nanopore direct RNA seq-based basecalling of m6A

| PRJEB61874 | ENA

Nanopore direct RNA seq-based basecalling of m6A (RNA004 curlcakes)

Project description:Nanopore direct RNA seq-based basecalling of m6A (RNA004 direct RNA sequenced curlcakes)

| PRJEB82528 | ENA

Nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Project description:Detection of circRNA through Nanopore direct RNA sequencing

| PRJEB52141 | ENA

Comparison of splicing tools

Project description:Study that compares three commonly used event-based differential splicing tools: rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2

2021-04-01 | GSE161144 | GEO

Nanopore direct RNA sequencing maps the complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA processing and m6A modification.

Project description:Understanding genome organization and gene regulation requires insight into RNA transcription, processing and modification. We adapted nanopore direct RNA sequencing to examine RNA from a wild-type accession of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and a mutant defective in mRNA methylation (m6A). Here we show that m6A can be mapped in full-length mRNAs transcriptome-wide and reveal the combinatorial diversity of cap-associated transcription start sites, splicing events, poly(A) site choice and poly(A) tail length. Loss of m6A from 3' untranslated regions is associated with decreased relative transcript abundance and defective RNA 3' end formation. A functional consequence of disrupted m6A is a lengthening of the circadian period. We conclude that nanopore direct RNA sequencing can reveal the complexity of mRNA processing and modification in full-length single molecule reads. These findings can refine Arabidopsis genome annotation. Further, applying this approach to less well-studied species could transform our understanding of what their genomes encode.

| S-EPMC6959997 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of splicing tools

Project description:Comparison of splicing tools

| PRJNA675664 | ENA

matchSCore: Matching Single-Cell Phenotypes Across Tools and Experiments

Project description:Single-cell transcriptomics allows the identification of cellular types, subtypes and states through cell clustering. In this process, similar cells are grouped before determining co-expressed marker genes for phenotype inference. The performance of computational tools is directly associated to their marker identification accuracy, but the lack of an optimal solution challenges a systematic method comparison. Moreover, phenotypes from different studies are challenging to integrate, due to varying resolution, methodology and experimental design. In this work we introduce matchSCore (https://github.com/elimereu/matchSCore), a measure to fastly match cell populations across tools, experiments and technologies. We compared 14 computational methods and evaluated their accuracy in clustering and gene marker identification in simulated data sets. Further, we used matchSCore to project cell type identities across mouse or human cell atlas projects. Despite originated from different technologies, cell populations could be matched across datasets, allowing the assignment of clusters to reference maps and their annotation.

2021-04-30 | GSE114138 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data