TAD Evolutionary and functional characterization reveals diversity in mammalian TAD boundary properties and function
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA812880 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR18230151_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18230151_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18230152_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18230152_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR18230153_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 140 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Topological associating domains (TADs) are self-interacting genomic units crucial for shaping gene regulation patterns. Despite their importance, the extent of their evolutionary conservation and its functional implications remain largely unknown. In this study, we generate Hi-C and ChIP-seq data and compare TAD organization across four primate and four rodent species, and characterize the genetic and epigenetic properties of TAD boundaries in correspondence to their evolutionary conservation. We find 14% of all human TAD boundaries to be shared among all eight species (ultraconserved), while 15% are human-specific. Ultraconserved TAD boundaries have stronger insulation strength, CTCF binding, and enrichment of older retrotransposons, compared to species-specific boundaries. CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts of two ultraconserved boundaries in mouse models leads to tissue-specific gene expression changes and morphological phenotypes. Deletion of a human-specific boundary near the autism-related AUTS2 gene results in upregulation of this gene in neurons. Overall, our study provides pertinent TAD boundary evolutionary conservation annotations, and showcase the functional importance of TAD evolution.
2023-10-20 | GSE197926 | GEO
Project description:Topological associating domains (TADs) are self-interacting genomic units crucial for shaping gene regulation patterns. Despite their importance, the extent of their evolutionary conservation and its functional implications remain largely unknown. In this study, we generate Hi-C and ChIP-seq data and compare TAD organization across four primate and four rodent species and characterize the genetic and epigenetic properties of TAD boundaries in correspondence to their evolutionary conservation. We find 14% of all human TAD boundaries to be shared among all eight species (ultraconserved), while 15% are human-specific. Ultraconserved TAD boundaries have stronger insulation strength, CTCF binding, and enrichment of older retrotransposons compared to species-specific boundaries. CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts of an ultraconserved boundary in a mouse model lead to tissue-specific gene expression changes and morphological phenotypes. Deletion of a human-specific boundary near the autism-related AUTS2 gene results in the upregulation of this gene in neurons. Overall, our study provides pertinent TAD boundary evolutionary conservation annotations and showcases the functional importance of TAD evolution.
| S-EPMC10703881 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context
2017-12-22 | GSE101715 | GEO
Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context
2017-12-22 | GSE101714 | GEO
Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context
2017-12-22 | GSE101713 | GEO
Project description:ABSTRACT The binding of the transcriptional regulator CTCF to the genome has been implicated in the formation of topologically associated domains (TADs). However, the general mechanisms of folding the genome into TADs are not fully understood. Here, we tested the effects of deleting a CTCF-rich locus on TAD boundary formation. Using genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), we focus on one TAD boundary on chromosome X harboring ~15 CTCF binding sites, and located at the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) locus Firre. Specifically, this TAD boundary is invariant across evolution, tissues, and temporal dynamics of X-chromosome inactivation. We demonstrate that neither the deletion of this locus, nor the ectopic insertion of Firre cDNA or its ectopic expression are sufficient to alter TADs in a sex-, or allele-specific manner. In contrast, Firre’s deletion disrupts the chromatin super-loop formation of the inactive X-chromosome. Collectively, our findings suggest that apart from CTCF binding, additional mechanisms may play roles in establishing TAD boundary formation. This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2018-02-12 | GSE98632 | GEO
Project description:The binding of the transcriptional regulator CTCF to the genome has been implicated in the formation of topologically associated domains (TADs). However, the general mechanisms of folding the genome into TADs are not fully understood. Here, we tested the effects of deleting a CTCF-rich locus on TAD boundary formation. Using genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), we focus on one TAD boundary on chromosome X harboring ~15 CTCF binding sites, and located at the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) locus Firre. Specifically, this TAD boundary is invariant across evolution, tissues, and temporal dynamics of X-chromosome inactivation. We demonstrate that neither the deletion of this locus, nor the ectopic insertion of Firre cDNA or its ectopic expression are sufficient to alter TADs in a sex-, or allele-specific manner. In contrast, Firre’s deletion disrupts the chromatin super-loop formation of the inactive X-chromosome. Collectively, our findings suggest that apart from CTCF binding, additional mechanisms can play roles in establishing TAD boundary formation.
2018-02-12 | GSE104814 | GEO
Project description:The binding of the transcriptional regulator CTCF to the genome has been implicated in the formation of topologically associated domains (TADs). However, the general mechanisms of folding the genome into TADs are not fully understood. Here, we tested the effects of deleting a CTCF-rich locus on TAD boundary formation. Using genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), we focus on one TAD boundary on chromosome X harboring ~15 CTCF binding sites, and located at the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) locus Firre. Specifically, this TAD boundary is invariant across evolution, tissues, and temporal dynamics of X-chromosome inactivation. We demonstrate that neither the deletion of this locus, nor the ectopic insertion of Firre cDNA or its ectopic expression are sufficient to alter TADs in a sex-, or allele-specific manner. In contrast, Firre’s deletion disrupts the chromatin super-loop formation of the inactive X-chromosome. Collectively, our findings suggest that apart from CTCF binding, additional mechanisms can play roles in establishing TAD boundary formation.
2018-02-12 | GSE104367 | GEO
Project description:Mammalian genomes are subdivided into large (50-2000 kb) regions of chromatin referred to as Topologically Associating Domains (TADs or sub-TADs). Chromatin within an individual TAD contacts itself more frequently than with regions in surrounding TADs thereby directing enhancer-promoter interactions. In many cases, the borders of TADs are defined by convergently orientated boundary elements associated with CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), which stabilises the cohesin complex on chromatin and prevents its translocation. This delimits chromatin loop extrusion which is thought to underlie the formation of TADs. However, not all CTCF-bound sites act as boundaries and, importantly, not all TADs are flanked by convergent CTCF sites. Here, we examined the CTCF binding sites within a ~70 kb sub-TAD containing the duplicated mouse α-like globin genes and their five enhancers (5’-R1-R2-R3-Rm-R4-α1-α2-3’). The 5’ border of this sub-TAD is defined by a pair of CTCF sites. Surprisingly, we show that deletion of the CTCF binding sites within and downstream of the α-globin locus leaves the sub-TAD largely intact. The predominant 3’ border of the sub-TAD is defined by a steep reduction in contacts: this corresponds to the transcribed α2-globin gene rather than the CTCF sites at the 3’-end of the sub-TAD. Of interest, the almost identical α1- and α2-globin genes interact differently with the enhancers, resulting in preferential expression of the proximal α1-globin gene which behaves as a partial boundary between the enhancers and the distal α2-globin gene. Together, these observations provide direct evidence that actively transcribed genes can behave as boundary elements.
2022-06-01 | GSE153207 | GEO
Project description:Mammalian genomes are subdivided into large (50-2000 kb) regions of chromatin referred to as Topologically Associating Domains (TADs or sub-TADs). Chromatin within an individual TAD contacts itself more frequently than with regions in surrounding TADs thereby directing enhancer-promoter interactions. In many cases, the borders of TADs are defined by convergently orientated boundary elements associated with CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), which stabilises the cohesin complex on chromatin and prevents its translocation. This delimits chromatin loop extrusion which is thought to underlie the formation of TADs. However, not all CTCF-bound sites act as boundaries and, importantly, not all TADs are flanked by convergent CTCF sites. Here, we examined the CTCF binding sites within a ~70 kb sub-TAD containing the duplicated mouse α-like globin genes and their five enhancers (5’-R1-R2-R3-Rm-R4-α1-α2-3’). The 5’ border of this sub-TAD is defined by a pair of CTCF sites. Surprisingly, we show that deletion of the CTCF binding sites within and downstream of the α-globin locus leaves the sub-TAD largely intact. The predominant 3’ border of the sub-TAD is defined by a steep reduction in contacts: this corresponds to the transcribed α2-globin gene rather than the CTCF sites at the 3’-end of the sub-TAD. Of interest, the almost identical α1- and α2-globin genes interact differently with the enhancers, resulting in preferential expression of the proximal α1-globin gene which behaves as a partial boundary between the enhancers and the distal α2-globin gene. Together, these observations provide direct evidence that actively transcribed genes can behave as boundary elements.
2022-06-01 | GSE153206 | GEO