Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

16S rRNA Sequences from Sodic soil

ABSTRACT: 16S rRNA Sequences from Sodic soil Raw sequence reads

PROVIDER: PRJNA818299 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR18398748_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR18398748_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR18398749_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR18398749_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR18398750_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 12

Similar Datasets

A phylogenetic microarray targeting 16S rRNA genes from the bacterial division Acidobacteria

Project description:Investigation of the phylogenetic diversity of Acidobacteria taxa using PCR amplicons from positive control 16S rRNA templates and total genomic DNA extracted from soil and a soil clay fraction A ten chip study using PCR amplicons from cloned 16S rRNA genes and from diverse soil 16S rRNAs, with PCR primers specific to the Division Acidobacteria. Each chip measures the signal from 42,194 probes (in triplicate) targeting Acidobacteria division, subdivision, and subclades as well as other bacterial phyla. All samples except one (GSM464591) include 2.5 M betaine in the hybridization buffer. Pair files lost due to a computer crash.

2010-06-24 | E-GEOD-18711 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A phylogenetic microarray targeting 16S rRNA genes from the bacterial division Acidobacteria

2010-01-01 | GSE18711 | GEO

U-GRASS 16S rRNA sequences

Project description:16S rRNA sequences from U-GRASS soil samples

| PRJEB36119 | ENA

Soil 16S rRNA

Project description:Soil 16S rRNA Metagenome

| PRJNA640989 | ENA

16S rRNA gene sequences aw6 p4, p5, p9, p10, p11, p12, p13, p14

Project description:Hypervariable regions V3-V5 of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/

2014-03-14 | E-ERAD-254 | biostudies-arrayexpress

sodic soil

Project description:sodic soil Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA771512 | ENA

sodic soil

Project description:sodic soil Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA772020 | ENA

Spotted Hyena Gut 16S rRNA sequences

Project description:Spotted Hyena Gut 16S rRNA sequences Metagenome

| PRJNA733503 | ENA

Bacterial 16S rRNA coding sequences and Eukaryotic 18S rRNA coding sequences

Project description:Bacterial 16S rRNA coding sequences and Eukaryotic 18S rRNA coding sequences Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA587984 | ENA

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: 16S rRNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-17532 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data