Project description:Mitophagy is essential to maintain mitochondrial function and prevent diseases. It activates upon mitochondria depolarization, which causes PINK1 stabilization on the mitochondrial outer membrane. Strikingly, a number of conditions, including mitochondrial protein misfolding, can induce mitophagy without a loss in membrane potential. The underlying molecular details remain unclear. Here, we report that a loss of mitochondrial protein import, mediated by the pre-sequence translocase-associated motor complex PAM, is sufficient to induce mitophagy in polarized mitochondria. A genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen for mitophagy inducers identifies components of the PAM complex. Protein import defects are able to induce mitophagy without a need for depolarization. Upon mitochondrial protein misfolding, PAM dissociates from the import machinery resulting in decreased protein import and mitophagy induction. Our findings extend the current mitophagy model to explain mitophagy induction upon conditions that do not affect membrane polarization, such as mitochondrial protein misfolding.
Project description:Upon mitochondrial dysfunction, mitophagy has been described to be activated by a breakdown of membrane potential leading to PINK1 accumulation on the outer membrane and engulfment of mitochondria for degradation. However, recent findings have indicated that mitophagy may also be triggered in the absence of membrane potential alterations. Here, we report mechanistic details on how inhibition of protein import induces mitophagy independent of mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Carrying out a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen for regulators of mitophagy, we found that the pre-sequence translocase-associated motor complex PAM controls mitophagy induction. Loss of PAM caused defects in protein import and was sufficient to induce mitophagy without depolarization. Quantitative interaction and aggregation proteomics revealed that PAM was highly sensitive to proteostasis perturbation; upon misfolding conditions, PAM dissociated from the import machinery, sequestered into the insoluble fraction and caused mitophagy despite an intact membrane potential. Our findings extend the current mitophagy model and provide mechanistic insight into how proteostasis perturbation leads to mitophagy induction. They reveal the PAM complex as key folding sensor integrating proteostasis, import and mitophagy.
Project description:Upon mitochondrial dysfunction, mitophagy has been described to be activated by a breakdown of membrane potential leading to PINK1 accumulation on the outer membrane and engulfment of mitochondria for degradation. However, recent findings have indicated that mitophagy may also be triggered in the absence of membrane potential alterations. Here, we report mechanistic details on how inhibition of protein import induces mitophagy independent of mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Carrying out a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen for regulators of mitophagy, we found that the pre-sequence translocase-associated motor complex PAM controls mitophagy induction. Loss of PAM caused defects in protein import and was sufficient to induce mitophagy without depolarization. Quantitative interaction and aggregation proteomics revealed that PAM was highly sensitive to proteostasis perturbation; upon misfolding conditions, PAM dissociated from the import machinery, sequestered into the insoluble fraction and caused mitophagy despite an intact membrane potential. Our findings extend the current mitophagy model and provide mechanistic insight into how proteostasis perturbation leads to mitophagy induction. They reveal the PAM complex as key folding sensor integrating proteostasis, import and mitophagy.
Project description:Upon mitochondrial dysfunction, mitophagy has been described to be activated by a breakdown of membrane potential leading to PINK1 accumulation on the outer membrane and engulfment of mitochondria for degradation. However, recent findings have indicated that mitophagy may also be triggered in the absence of membrane potential alterations. Here, we report mechanistic details on how inhibition of protein import induces mitophagy independent of mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Carrying out a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen for regulators of mitophagy, we found that the pre-sequence translocase-associated motor complex PAM controls mitophagy induction. Loss of PAM caused defects in protein import and was sufficient to induce mitophagy without depolarization. Quantitative interaction and aggregation proteomics revealed that PAM was highly sensitive to proteostasis perturbation; upon misfolding conditions, PAM dissociated from the import machinery, sequestered into the insoluble fraction and caused mitophagy despite an intact membrane potential. Our findings extend the current mitophagy model and provide mechanistic insight into how proteostasis perturbation leads to mitophagy induction. They reveal the PAM complex as key folding sensor integrating proteostasis, import and mitophagy.
Project description:Mitochondrial biogenesis requires the import of >1,000 mitochondrial preproteins from the cytosol. Most studies on mitochondrial protein import are focused on the core import machinery. Whether and how the biophysical properties of substrate preproteins affect overall import efficiency is underexplored. Here, we show that protein traffic into mitochondria can be disrupted by amino acid substitutions in a single substrate preprotein. Pathogenic missense mutations in adenine nucleotide translocase 1 (Ant1), and its yeast homolog Aac2, cause the protein to accumulate along the protein import pathway, thereby obstructing general protein translocation into mitochondria. This impairs mitochondrial respiration, cytosolic proteostasis and cell viability independent of Ant1’s nucleotide transport activity. The mutations act synergistically, as double mutant Aac2/Ant1 cause severe clogging primarily at the Translocase of the Outer Membrane (TOM) complex. This confers extreme toxicity in yeast. In mice, expression of a super-clogger Ant1 variant led to neurodegeneration and an age-dependent dominant myopathy that phenocopy Ant1-induced human disease, suggesting clogging as a mechanism of disease. More broadly, this work implies the existence of uncharacterized amino acid requirements for mitochondrial carrier proteins to avoid clogging and subsequent disease.
Project description:Aim: To identify regulatory factors that control: (1) chloroplast protein importand (2) chloroplast-to-nucleus signalling. This project is a joint proposal from the Jarvis lab which is interested in chloroplast protein import [1] and the Moller lab which is interested in plastid-to-nucleus signalling [2]. Background: The majority of chloroplast proteins are encoded in the nucleus and imported post-translationally into chloroplasts. The abundance of chloroplast proteins may therefore be regulated at multiple levels. It is well documented that the nuclear gene expression is responsive to (largely unknown) signals from the chloroplast [23] and evidence is now emerging that protein import is also a regulated process [1]. Protein import into chloroplasts is mediated by protein complexes in the outer and inner envelope membranes called Toc and Tic respectively. Biochemical studies of pea chloroplasts identified several Toc/Tic components. These proteins are mechanistic or structural components of the import apparatus. Arabidopsis homologues of the pea Toc/Tic proteins were identified by the AGI. Pea Toc34 is represented in Arabidopsis by two genes "Toc33 and Toc34" and pea Toc75 is represented by three genes. These different Tocs have different expression patterns and are proposed to have different precursor protein recognition specificities. The factors that regulate Toc expression in concert with the needs of plastids in developmentally different cells are unknown. Proposal: Two Arabidopsis mutants will be analysed. The ppi1 mutant is null for the putative precursor protein receptor Toc33 [1]and the ppi3 mutant is null for a putative component of the protein import channel Toc75-IV (on chromosome IV). ppi1 plants are yellow-green in appearance but remarkably healthy and grow only slightly more slowly than wild type. By contrast ppi3 plants are indistinguishable from wild type by eye although analysis of the mutant's chloroplast proteome is beginning to reveal some differences (K. Lilley personal communication). Gene expression changes in ppi1 are likely to be quite extensive. Retardation of chloroplast development in ppi1 will activate retrograde signalling pathways so that many nuclear photosynthetic genes are down-regulated. Changes in the expression of photosynthetic genes and of the genes responsible for mediating these responses may therefore be observed. Any regulatory and signalling genes identified will be of interest to the Moller lab. The expression of factors that regulate Toc/Tic gene expression may also be altered in ppi1. It should be possible to distinguish these factors from those involved in the general control of chloroplast gene expression by comparing the results from the two mutants. Genes affected in both mutants are more likely to be involved in regulating chloroplast import since it is unlikely that widespread changes in gene expression will be observed in ppi3. Changes in the expression of factors that regulate import post-translationallyand of the Toc/Tic genes themselves (many are on the RNA) may also be observed. References: 1. Jarvis P. et al. (1998) Science 282: 100-103. 2. Moller S.G. et al. (2001) Genes Dev. 15:90-103. 3. Jarvis P. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11: R307-R310.
Project description:Transcriptional mitochondrial stress response to CHCHD10 G58R protein misfolding in mouse heart, gastrocnemius, and tibalis anterior muscle the presence and absence of the DELE1 mitochondrial integrated stress responses
Project description:Aim: To identify regulatory factors that control: (1) chloroplast protein importand (2) chloroplast-to-nucleus signalling. This project is a joint proposal from the Jarvis lab which is interested in chloroplast protein import [1] and the Moller lab which is interested in plastid-to-nucleus signalling [2]. Background: The majority of chloroplast proteins are encoded in the nucleus and imported post-translationally into chloroplasts. The abundance of chloroplast proteins may therefore be regulated at multiple levels. It is well documented that the nuclear gene expression is responsive to (largely unknown) signals from the chloroplast [23] and evidence is now emerging that protein import is also a regulated process [1]. Protein import into chloroplasts is mediated by protein complexes in the outer and inner envelope membranes called Toc and Tic respectively. Biochemical studies of pea chloroplasts identified several Toc/Tic components. These proteins are mechanistic or structural components of the import apparatus. Arabidopsis homologues of the pea Toc/Tic proteins were identified by the AGI. Pea Toc34 is represented in Arabidopsis by two genes "Toc33 and Toc34" and pea Toc75 is represented by three genes. These different Tocs have different expression patterns and are proposed to have different precursor protein recognition specificities. The factors that regulate Toc expression in concert with the needs of plastids in developmentally different cells are unknown. Proposal: Two Arabidopsis mutants will be analysed. The ppi1 mutant is null for the putative precursor protein receptor Toc33 [1]and the ppi3 mutant is null for a putative component of the protein import channel Toc75-IV (on chromosome IV). ppi1 plants are yellow-green in appearance but remarkably healthy and grow only slightly more slowly than wild type. By contrast ppi3 plants are indistinguishable from wild type by eye although analysis of the mutant's chloroplast proteome is beginning to reveal some differences (K. Lilley personal communication). Gene expression changes in ppi1 are likely to be quite extensive. Retardation of chloroplast development in ppi1 will activate retrograde signalling pathways so that many nuclear photosynthetic genes are down-regulated. Changes in the expression of photosynthetic genes and of the genes responsible for mediating these responses may therefore be observed. Any regulatory and signalling genes identified will be of interest to the Moller lab. The expression of factors that regulate Toc/Tic gene expression may also be altered in ppi1. It should be possible to distinguish these factors from those involved in the general control of chloroplast gene expression by comparing the results from the two mutants. Genes affected in both mutants are more likely to be involved in regulating chloroplast import since it is unlikely that widespread changes in gene expression will be observed in ppi3. Changes in the expression of factors that regulate import post-translationallyand of the Toc/Tic genes themselves (many are on the RNA) may also be observed. References: 1. Jarvis P. et al. (1998) Science 282: 100-103. 2. Moller S.G. et al. (2001) Genes Dev. 15:90-103. 3. Jarvis P. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11: R307-R310. Experiment Overall Design: Number of plants pooled:
Project description:We have employed whole genome microarray expression profiling to track the transcriptome expression change under DTT induced protein misfolding stress. The relative importance of gene expression regulation at the mRNA versus the protein-level is a matter of ongoing debate. We present an in-depth analysis of a cervical cancer cell line responding to protein misfolding stress induced by dithiothreitol treatment, quantifying the dynamics of mRNA and protein concentrations for >3,500 genes over a time-course 30 hours. While the early phase of the experiment (<two hours) was marked by apoptosis, surviving cells were marked by a strong response to unfolded proteins and stress of the endoplasmatic reticulum, specifically during the intermediate phase (two to eight hours). Using statistical time series analysis, we detected significant changes in the regulatory parameters at the RNA-level, caused by transcription and mRNA degradation, and at the protein-level, caused by translation and protein degradation. mRNA- and protein-level regulation were of equal importance (XX and YYY%, respectively), but displayed different magnitudes and dynamics: mRNA fold changes were much smaller on average than those of the proteins. While our method did not capture immediate changes, we found the strongest regulatory response between two and eight hours after the treatment. mRNA-level regulation showed a spike around this time interval, while protein-level regulation was delayed and continued at slower pace until the end of the experiment.