Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Evaluation of cell cycle phase dependent transcriptional changes by single cell RNA-seq

ABSTRACT: Evaluation of cell cycle phase dependent transcriptional changes by single cell RNA-seq

PROVIDER: PRJNA913699 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR22806078_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR22806078_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR22806079_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR22806079_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 4 of 4

Similar Datasets

Cell cycle-dependent chromatin and transcriptional changes

Project description:Cell cycle-dependent chromatin and transcriptional changes

| PRJNA705689 | ENA

Quantifying continuous cell-cycle phase using single-cell gene expression data

Project description:Quantifying continuous cell-cycle phase using single-cell gene expression data

| PRJNA496506 | ENA

Evaluation of cell cycle phase dependent transcriptional changes by single cell RNA-seq

Project description:We performed single cell RNA MULTI-seq using 10x v3 platform with 24h induced and non-induced FOXD3 KO cells.

2023-04-30 | GSE221260 | GEO

Cell cycle-dependent chromatin and transcriptional changes

Project description:The cellular and nuclear states are constantly changing and closely linked to DNA replication and cell division, defining cell cycle phases. Pharmacological inhibition is a widely used strategy to enrich for specific phases to study them in isolation. However, it is important to understand how synchronization influences chromatin openness and gene expression compared to unperturbed cell cycle states. Here, we use an integrated approach to obtain G1, S and G2/M phases from mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) and to profile their chromatin accessibility and marks as well as steady and nascent transcripts levels. We demonstrate that synchronization with thymidine and nocodazole leads to dramatic changes in chromatin compaction and gene expression, which only partially resemble bona fide cell cycle-dependent differences. Blocking with CDK1 inhibitor results in efficient synchronization and evokes moderate changes in chromatin accessibility, resembling G2/M phase. Correlative analysis suggests that cell cycle-specific variations in chromatin openness in unperturbed mESCs are mediated by CDK1 substrates and CTCF. This integrated strategy can be applied to most cultured cell lines under any conditions and holds the potential to further our understanding of cell cycle-dependent susceptibility to external cues and chromatin regulation.

2021-12-31 | GSE167963 | GEO

Identification of DHT induced cell cycle dependent trascriptome in prostate cancer cells

Project description:Evaluation of the genome wide impact of cell cycle position on DHT stimulated gene expression programs. Results show differential cell cycle regulated gene expression in different cell cycle phases.

2016-10-05 | GSE82201 | GEO

Effect of Exportin-5 expression on Mouse fibroblasts in cell cycle re-entry phase

Project description:To analyze the effect of Exportin-5 expression on the MEF cells in cell cycle re-entry phase, we have employed whole genome microarray expression profiling on the MEF cells in cell cycle re-entry phase with and without down regulation of Exportin-5 gene.

2013-01-01 | GSE25498 | GEO

Identification of cell cycle-related genes up-regulated during the G2-phase in Giardia lamblia

Project description:To identify the component(s) involved in cell cycle control in the protozoan Giardia lamblia, cells arrested at the G1- or G2-phase by treatment with nocodazole and aphidicolin were prepared from the synchronized cell cultures. RNA-sequencing analysis of the two stages of Giardia cell cycle identified several cell cycle genes that were up-regulated at the G2-phase. This result indicates that the cell cycle machinery operates in this protozoan, one of the earliest diverging eukaryotic lineages.

2019-02-20 | GSE126731 | GEO

Evaluation of ORC and Mcm2-7 Distribution Throughout the Drosophila Kc Cell Cycle

Project description:Evaluation of ORC and Mcm2-7 Distribution Throughout the Drosophila Kc Cell Cycle

| PRJNA269387 | ENA

Transcriptome of plants cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle

Project description:Gene expression must be reconfigured rapidly during the subsequent phases of the cell cycle to execute the cellular functions specific of each phase. Post-transcriptional regulation has a predominant role in modulating gene expression during the mitotic cell cycle, including among other mechanisms, protein phosphorylation and ubiquitination, differential protein stability and mRNA localization and translatability. Regulation at the transcriptional level is also important, as studies conducted in synchronized plant cell suspension cultures have identified hundreds of genes with periodic patterns of genes expression across the phases of the cell cycle. We describe here an alternative strategy to cell suspension cultures to profile the transcriptome of Arabidopsis root cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Through fluorescence activated cell sorting we first isolated cells in G2/M using CYCB1;1-GFP, a reporter of a mitotic cyclin. The analysis of the transcriptome of these cells allowed us to identify hundreds of genes whose expression is depleted or enriched in G2/M cells.

2021-02-08 | GSE144842 | GEO

Global analysis of differential polyadenylation of mRNAs during mitotic cell cycle: S phase versus G2/M phase.

Project description:We compared the poly(A) tail length status of mRNAs of HeLa cells between two phases of the mitotic cell cycle: S and G2/M phases. Hundreds of mRNAs were found to be regulated by changes in their poly(A) tail length during mitotic cell cycle in a phase specific manner. Many of these differentially polyadenylated mRNAs encode proteins related to cell death, cell cycle and cellular growth and proliferation. HeLa cells were synchronized with double thymidine blockade (12 hours with 2 mM thymidine, 12 hours release, and 12 hours with 2 mM thymidine), and samples were taken after 2 hours release (S phase) and 8 hours release (G2/M phase). For each condition total RNA was purified by two different procedures: poly(U) chromatography and oligo(dT)-chromatography. Poly(U)-chromatography (Jacobson, 1987): 100 μg of total RNA were bound to poly(U)-sepharose (Sigma) and eluted at 35ºC to isolate mRNAs with short poly(A) tail (<30As, SHORT fraction). Oligo(dT) chromatography: mRNAs were purified independently of their poly(A) tail length with Ambion Poly(A)Purist kit from 20 μg total RNA (ALL fraction). Jacobson, A. Purification and fractionation of poly(A)+ RNA. Methods in Enzymology (1987) 152: 254-261. Keywords: time course

2010-04-01 | GSE15399 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data