Project description:Prime editors (PEs) can mediate versatile genome editing but their efficiency remains low. Here, we developed spegRNA by introducing same-sense mutations at proper positions in the reverse-transcription template of pegRNA to increase PE’s single-base editing efficiency or apegRNA by altering the pegRNA secondary structure to increase PE’s indel-editing efficiency . When used in PE3 and PE5, the efficiencies of sPE3, aPE3, sPE5 and aPE5 were all enhanced significantly.
Project description:We evaluate CRISPR-based prime editing for application in organoids. First we model mutations in TP53 in intestinal and hepatocyte oganoids and determine the efficiency and accuracy of mutation induction on multiple targets. Then, to evaluate potential clinical applicability of prime editing we repair mutations in the CFTR channel that cause cystic fibrosis in intestinal organoids. First we repair the CFTR-F508del mutation which is the most common mutation in cystic fibrosis. Then we compare adenine base editing to prime editing by repairing the CFTR-R785* mutation using both strategies.
Project description:Prime editing is a powerful means of introducing precise changes to specific locations in mammalian genomes. However, the widely varying efficiency of prime editing across target sites of interest has limited its adoption in the context of both basic research and clinical settings. Here, we set out to exhaustively characterize the impact of the cis-chromatin environment on prime editing efficiency. Utilizing a newly developed and highly sensitive method for mapping the genomic locations of a randomly integrated “sensor”, we identify specific epigenetic features that strongly correlate with the highly variable efficiency of prime editing across different genomic locations. Next, to assess the interaction of trans-acting factors with the cis-chromatin environment, we develop and apply a pooled genetic screening approach with which the impact of knocking down various DNA repair factors on prime editing efficiency can be stratified by cis-chromatin context. Finally, we demonstrate that we can dramatically modulate the efficiency of prime editing through epigenome editing, i.e. enhancing (or restricting) local chromatin accessibility in order to increase (or decrease) the efficiency of prime editing at a target site. Looking forward, we envision that the insights and tools described here will broaden the range of both basic research and therapeutic contexts in which prime editing is useful.
Project description:Prime editing is a powerful means of introducing precise changes to specific locations in mammalian genomes. However, the widely varying efficiency of prime editing across target sites of interest has limited its adoption in the context of both basic research and clinical settings. Here, we set out to exhaustively characterize the impact of the cis-chromatin environment on prime editing efficiency. Utilizing a newly developed and highly sensitive method for mapping the genomic locations of a randomly integrated “sensor”, we identify specific epigenetic features that strongly correlate with the highly variable efficiency of prime editing across different genomic locations. Next, to assess the interaction of trans-acting factors with the cis-chromatin environment, we develop and apply a pooled genetic screening approach with which the impact of knocking down various DNA repair factors on prime editing efficiency can be stratified by cis-chromatin context. Finally, we demonstrate that we can dramatically modulate the efficiency of prime editing through epigenome editing, i.e. enhancing (or restricting) local chromatin accessibility in order to increase (or decrease) the efficiency of prime editing at a target site. Looking forward, we envision that the insights and tools described here will broaden the range of both basic research and therapeutic contexts in which prime editing is useful.
Project description:Prime editing is a powerful means of introducing precise changes to specific locations in mammalian genomes. However, the widely varying efficiency of prime editing across target sites of interest has limited its adoption in the context of both basic research and clinical settings. Here, we set out to exhaustively characterize the impact of the cis-chromatin environment on prime editing efficiency. Utilizing a newly developed and highly sensitive method for mapping the genomic locations of a randomly integrated “sensor”, we identify specific epigenetic features that strongly correlate with the highly variable efficiency of prime editing across different genomic locations. Next, to assess the interaction of trans-acting factors with the cis-chromatin environment, we develop and apply a pooled genetic screening approach with which the impact of knocking down various DNA repair factors on prime editing efficiency can be stratified by cis-chromatin context. Finally, we demonstrate that we can dramatically modulate the efficiency of prime editing through epigenome editing, i.e. enhancing (or restricting) local chromatin accessibility in order to increase (or decrease) the efficiency of prime editing at a target site. Looking forward, we envision that the insights and tools described here will broaden the range of both basic research and therapeutic contexts in which prime editing is useful.
Project description:Purpose: The goals of this study are to introduce a new genome editing tool, which has the higher editing scope than the original genome editing tools. Methods: First, we transfected PE2 (the original prime editing tool, prime editor2), PE3 (the original prime editing tool, prime editor3) and HOPE (the new tool we developed in this study) vectors into human cells, respectively. Then, we harvested the genomic DNA form the transfected cells and amplified the specified amplicons. Finally, we used targeted amplicon sequencing approach to compare the editing efficiency and presion of the new tool with the original reported tools. Results: Our new genome editing tool improves the editing efficiency of prime editing without increasing the risk of undesired indels formation. Conclusions: We deleveped a new genome editing tool to increase the likelihood of successful gene engineering.
Project description:Emerging base and prime editing may provide safer and more precise genetic engineering than nuclease-based approaches bypassing the dependence on DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). However, little is known about cellular responses and genotoxicity. Here, we comparatively assessed state-of-the-art base and prime editors (B/PE) versus Cas9 in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). BE and PE induced detrimental transcriptional responses constraining editing efficiency and/or HSPC repopulation in xenotransplants, albeit to a lesser extent than Cas9. DNA DSBs and their genotoxic byproducts, including deletions and translocations, were less frequent but not abrogated by BE and PE, particularly for cytidine BE due to suboptimal inhibition of base excision repair. Tailoring timing and B/PE expression enabled highly efficient and precise editing of long-term repopulating HSPCs. However, we uncovered a genome-wide effect of BEs on the mutational landscape of HSPCs, raising concerns for a potential genotoxic impact and calling for further investigations and improvements in view of clinical application.
Project description:Emerging base and prime editing may provide safer and more precise genetic engineering than nuclease-based approaches bypassing the dependence on DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). However, little is known about cellular responses and genotoxicity. Here, we comparatively assessed state-of-the-art base and prime editors (B/PE) versus Cas9 in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). BE and PE induced detrimental transcriptional responses constraining editing efficiency and/or HSPC repopulation in xenotransplants, albeit to a lesser extent than Cas9. DNA DSBs and their genotoxic byproducts, including deletions and translocations, were less frequent but not abrogated by BE and PE, particularly for cytidine BE due to suboptimal inhibition of base excision repair. Tailoring timing and B/PE expression enabled highly efficient and precise editing of long-term repopulating HSPCs. However, we uncovered a genome-wide effect of BEs on the mutational landscape of HSPCs, raising concerns for a potential genotoxic impact and calling for further investigations and improvements in view of clinical application.
Project description:Emerging base and prime editing may provide safer and more precise genetic engineering than nuclease-based approaches bypassing the dependence on DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). However, little is known about cellular responses and genotoxicity. Here, we comparatively assessed state-of-the-art base and prime editors (B/PE) versus Cas9 in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). BE and PE induced detrimental transcriptional responses constraining editing efficiency and/or HSPC repopulation in xenotransplants, albeit to a lesser extent than Cas9. DNA DSBs and their genotoxic byproducts, including deletions and translocations, were less frequent but not abrogated by BE and PE, particularly for cytidine BE due to suboptimal inhibition of base excision repair. Tailoring timing and B/PE expression enabled highly efficient and precise editing of long-term repopulating HSPCs. However, we uncovered a genome-wide effect of BEs on the mutational landscape of HSPCs, raising concerns for a potential genotoxic impact and calling for further investigations and improvements in view of clinical application.
Project description:Emerging base and prime editing may provide safer and more precise genetic engineering than nuclease-based approaches bypassing the dependence on DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). However, little is known about cellular responses and genotoxicity. Here, we comparatively assessed state-of-the-art base and prime editors (B/PE) versus Cas9 in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). BE and PE induced detrimental transcriptional responses constraining editing efficiency and/or HSPC repopulation in xenotransplants, albeit to a lesser extent than Cas9. DNA DSBs and their genotoxic byproducts, including deletions and translocations, were less frequent but not abrogated by BE and PE, particularly for cytidine BE due to suboptimal inhibition of base excision repair. Tailoring timing and B/PE expression enabled highly efficient and precise editing of long-term repopulating HSPCs. However, we uncovered a genome-wide effect of BEs on the mutational landscape of HSPCs, raising concerns for a potential genotoxic impact and calling for further investigations and improvements in view of clinical application.