Performance comparison of high throughput single-cell RNA-Seq platforms in complex tissues
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA955796 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR24175925_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24175925_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24175926_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24175926_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR24175927_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 28 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Single-cell transcriptomics has emerged as the preferred tool to define cell identity through the analysis of gene expression signatures. However, there are limited studies that have comprehensively compared the performance of different scRNAseq systems in complex tissues. Here, we present a systematic comparison of three well-established high throughput 3’-scRNAseq platforms: Drop-seq, 10x Chromium and BD Rhapsody; using tumours that present high cell diversity. Our experimental design includes both fresh and artificially damaged samples from the same tumours, which also provides a comparable dataset to examine their performance under challenging conditions. The performance metrics used in this study consist of gene sensitivity, mitochondrial content, reproducibility, clustering capabilities, cell type representation and ambient RNA contamination. These analyses showed that BD Rhapsody and 10x Chromium have similar but higher gene sensitivity than Drop-seq, while BD Rhapsody has the highest mitochondrial content. Interestingly, we found cell type detection biases between platforms, including a lower proportion of endothelial and myofibroblast cells in BD Rhapsody and lower gene sensitivity in granulocytes for 10x Chromium. Moreover, the source of the ambient noise was different between plate-based and droplet-based platforms. In conclusion, our reported platform differential performance should be considered for the selection of the scRNAseq method during the study experimental designs.
2024-09-04 | GSE229765 | GEO
Project description:This data is part of a miRNA platform comparison study. We compared the performance characteristics of four commercial miRNA array technologies and found that all platforms performed well in separate measures of performance. The Ambion and Agilent platforms were more accurate, whereas the Illumina and Exiqon platforms were more specific. Furthermore, the data analysis approach had a large impact on the performance, predominantly by improving precision. Performance of four (4) commercially available miRNA platforms was evaluated using 7 placenta samples spiked with synthetic microRNA spikes (in Latin-square design) absent in placenta. Platforms were primarily evaluated for accuracy and specificity.
2010-06-23 | E-GEOD-19248 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This data is part of a miRNA platform comparison study. We compared the performance characteristics of four commercial miRNA array technologies and found that all platforms performed well in separate measures of performance. The Ambion and Agilent platforms were more accurate, whereas the Illumina and Exiqon platforms were more specific. Furthermore, the data analysis approach had a large impact on the performance, predominantly by improving precision.
2010-03-18 | GSE19248 | GEO
Project description:Profiling of mRNA abundances with high-throughput platforms such as microarrays and RNA-Seq has become an important tool in both basic and biomedical research. However these platforms remain prone to systematic errors, and have challenges in clinical and industrial application. As a result it is standard practice to validate a subset of key results using alternate technologies. Similarly, clinical and industrial applications typically involve transitions from high-throughput discovery platform to medium-throughput validation ones. These medium-throughput validation platforms have high technical reproducibility and reduced sample input needs, and low sensitivity to sample-quality (e.g. for processing FFPE specimens). Unfortunately, while medium-throughput platforms have proliferated, there are no comprehensive comparisons of them. Here we present ABI's OpenArray and qPCR systems.
2012-10-18 | GSE41388 | GEO
Project description:This study focuses on platform comparison to assess performance variability in circulating microRNA (ct-miR) detection, agreement in assignment of a miR signature classifier (MSC) and concordance for the identification of cancer-associated miRs in plasma samples from non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A plasma cohort of 10 NSCLC patients and 10 healthy donors matched for clinical features and MSC risk level was profiled for miRs expression using two sequencing- and three quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based platforms. Intra- and inter-platform variations were examined by correlation and concordance analysis. MSC risk levels were compared to those estimated using a reference method. Differentially expressed ct-miRs were identified among NSCLC patients and donors and the diagnostic value of those dysregulated in patients was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Downregulation of miR-150-5p was verified by qPCR. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung carcinoma dataset was used for validation at tissue level. Intra-platform reproducibility was consistent whereas the highest values of inter-platform correlations were among qPCR-based platforms. MSC classification concordance was >80% for four platforms. Dysregulation and discriminatory power of miR-150-5p and -210-3p were documented. Both were significantly dysregulated also on TCGA tissue-originated profiles from lung cell carcinoma in comparison to normal samples. Overall, our studies provide a large performance analysis between five different platforms for miRs quantification, indicate the solidity of MSC classifier and identify two noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC
2022-08-10 | GSE204945 | GEO
Project description:This study focuses on platform comparison to assess performance variability in circulating microRNA (ct-miR) detection, agreement in assignment of a miR signature classifier (MSC) and concordance for the identification of cancer-associated miRs in plasma samples from non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A plasma cohort of 10 NSCLC patients and 10 healthy donors matched for clinical features and MSC risk level was profiled for miRs expression using two sequencing- and three quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based platforms. Intra- and inter-platform variations were examined by correlation and concordance analysis. MSC risk levels were compared to those estimated using a reference method. Differentially expressed ct-miRs were identified among NSCLC patients and donors and the diagnostic value of those dysregulated in patients was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Downregulation of miR-150-5p was verified by qPCR. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung carcinoma dataset was used for validation at tissue level. Intra-platform reproducibility was consistent whereas the highest values of inter-platform correlations were among qPCR-based platforms. MSC classification concordance was >80% for four platforms. Dysregulation and discriminatory power of miR-150-5p and -210-3p were documented. Both were significantly dysregulated also on TCGA tissue-originated profiles from lung cell carcinoma in comparison to normal samples. Overall, our studies provide a large performance analysis between five different platforms for miRs quantification, indicate the solidity of MSC classifier and identify two noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC
2022-08-10 | GSE204950 | GEO
Project description:Profiling of mRNA abundances with high-throughput platforms such as microarrays and RNA-Seq has become an important tool in both basic and biomedical research. However these platforms remain prone to systematic errors, and have challenges in clinical and industrial application. As a result it is standard practice to validate a subset of key results using alternate technologies. Similarly, clinical and industrial applications typically involve transitions from high-throughput discovery platform to medium-throughput validation ones. These medium-throughput validation platforms have high technical reproducibility and reduced sample input needs, and low sensitivity to sample-quality (e.g. for processing FFPE specimens). Unfortunately, while medium-throughput platforms have proliferated, there are no comprehensive comparisons of them. Here we present ABI's OpenArray and qPCR systems. TCDD-sensitive (Long-Evans) and TCDD-resistant (Han/Wistar) rats were used in both time-course and dose response studies to asses the transcriptomic response to TCDD-insult. The time-course experiment saw animals recieve a single dose of 100ug/kg TCDD or corn oil vehicle followed by euthanasia and tissue collection at various time-points. Animals in the dose-response experiment recieved a single dose of TCDD at varying concentrations or corn oil vehicle, followed by euthanasia and tissue collection 19 hours post-treatment. Each treatment group contained 4-5 biologicial replicates.
2012-10-18 | E-GEOD-41388 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This study focuses on platform comparison to assess performance variability in circulating microRNA (ct-miR) detection, agreement in assignment of a miR signature classifier (MSC) and concordance for the identification of cancer-associated miRs in plasma samples from non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A plasma cohort of 10 NSCLC patients and 10 healthy donors matched for clinical features and MSC risk level was profiled for miRs expression using two sequencing- and three quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based platforms. Intra- and inter-platform variations were examined by correlation and concordance analysis. MSC risk levels were compared to those estimated using a reference method. Differentially expressed ct-miRs were identified among NSCLC patients and donors and the diagnostic value of those dysregulated in patients was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Downregulation of miR-150-5p was verified by qPCR. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung carcinoma dataset was used for validation at tissue level. Intra-platform reproducibility was consistent whereas the highest values of inter-platform correlations were among qPCR-based platforms. MSC classification concordance was >80% for four platforms. Dysregulation and discriminatory power of miR-150-5p and -210-3p were documented. Both were significantly dysregulated also on TCGA tissue-originated profiles from lung cell carcinoma in comparison to normal samples. Overall, our studies provide a large performance analysis between five different platforms for miRs quantification, indicate the solidity of MSC classifier and identify two noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC
2022-08-10 | GSE203514 | GEO
Project description:This study focuses on platform comparison to assess performance variability in circulating microRNA (ct-miR) detection, agreement in assignment of a miR signature classifier (MSC) and concordance for the identification of cancer-associated miRs in plasma samples from non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A plasma cohort of 10 NSCLC patients and 10 healthy donors matched for clinical features and MSC risk level was profiled for miRs expression using two sequencing- and three quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based platforms. Intra- and inter-platform variations were examined by correlation and concordance analysis. MSC risk levels were compared to those estimated using a reference method. Differentially expressed ct-miRs were identified among NSCLC patients and donors and the diagnostic value of those dysregulated in patients was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Downregulation of miR-150-5p was verified by qPCR. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung carcinoma dataset was used for validation at tissue level. Intra-platform reproducibility was consistent whereas the highest values of inter-platform correlations were among qPCR-based platforms. MSC classification concordance was >80% for four platforms. Dysregulation and discriminatory power of miR-150-5p and -210-3p were documented. Both were significantly dysregulated also on TCGA tissue-originated profiles from lung cell carcinoma in comparison to normal samples. Overall, our studies provide a large performance analysis between five different platforms for miRs quantification, indicate the solidity of MSC classifier and identify two noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC
2022-08-10 | GSE203510 | GEO
Project description:This study focuses on platform comparison to assess performance variability in circulating microRNA (ct-miR) detection, agreement in assignment of a miR signature classifier (MSC) and concordance for the identification of cancer-associated miRs in plasma samples from non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A plasma cohort of 10 NSCLC patients and 10 healthy donors matched for clinical features and MSC risk level was profiled for miRs expression using two sequencing- and three quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based platforms. Intra- and inter-platform variations were examined by correlation and concordance analysis. MSC risk levels were compared to those estimated using a reference method. Differentially expressed ct-miRs were identified among NSCLC patients and donors and the diagnostic value of those dysregulated in patients was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Downregulation of miR-150-5p was verified by qPCR. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung carcinoma dataset was used for validation at tissue level. Intra-platform reproducibility was consistent whereas the highest values of inter-platform correlations were among qPCR-based platforms. MSC classification concordance was >80% for four platforms. Dysregulation and discriminatory power of miR-150-5p and -210-3p were documented. Both were significantly dysregulated also on TCGA tissue-originated profiles from lung cell carcinoma in comparison to normal samples. Overall, our studies provide a large performance analysis between five different platforms for miRs quantification, indicate the solidity of MSC classifier and identify two noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC
2022-08-10 | GSE204942 | GEO