Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Soil metagenome

ABSTRACT: Differences in microbial community structure among tea plantation soils under different management strategies

PROVIDER: PRJNA983565 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR24914400_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR24914400_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR24914401_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR24914401_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR24914402_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 48

Similar Datasets

Project description:soil fungal diversity in tea plantation under different management models across 5 provinces

| PRJNA722691 | ENA

Project description:Bacterial community structure in an organic tea plantation

| PRJNA642253 | ENA

microbial community from different tea plantation

Project description:microbial community from different tea plantation Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA551933 | ENA

Effect of land use and soil organic matter quality on the structure and function of microbial communities in pastoral soils: implications for disease suppression

Project description:Cropping soils vary in extent of natural suppression of soil-borne plant diseases. However, it is unknown whether similar variation occurs across pastoral agricultural systems. We examined soil microbial community properties known to be associated with disease suppression across 50 pastoral fields varying in management intensity. The composition and abundance of the disease-suppressive community were assessed from both taxonomic and functional perspectives.

2018-03-30 | GSE112489 | GEO

C. elegans genomic response to Konza Prairie Soil bacterial environment

Project description:Here we have compared adult wildtype (N2) C. elegans gene expression when grown on different bacterial environments/fod sources in an effort to model naturally occuring nematode-bacteria interactions at the Konza Prairie. We hypothesize that human-induced changes to natural environments, such as the addition of nitrogen fertalizer, have effects on the bacterial community in soils and this drives downstream changes in the structure on soil bacterial-feeding nematode community structure. Here we have used transcriptional profiling to identify candidate genes involved in the interaction of nematodes and bacteria in nature.

2009-05-02 | GSE15923 | GEO

soil metagenome

Project description:Microbial Community Structure in different soils

| PRJNA352288 | ENA

Project description:The effect of organic management on soil bacterial community in Chinese tea plantation

| PRJNA655346 | ENA

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: genomic DNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: 16S rRNA

2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-17532 | biostudies-arrayexpress

soil metagenome

Project description:Bacterial community in tea plantation soil

| PRJNA670895 | ENA