Postnatal intestinal response of IUGR piglets to high proteins before weaning
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Sus scrofa
SUBMITTER: Isabelle Luron
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-18249 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Comparison of distal small intestine and colon in IntraUterine Growth Restricted versus normal birth weight piglets at the age of 19 days of life. Keywords: Nutritional state comparative analysis. 22 samples - One sample versus a pool
2010-05-16 | E-GEOD-14716 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Kinetic comparative study of distal small intestine and colon of IntraUterine Growth Restricted vs. normal birth weight piglets at the age of 0, 2 and 5 days of life. Keywords: Nutritional state and time-course comparative analysis. 66 samples - One sample versus a pool
2010-06-24 | E-GEOD-15384 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:At implantation the endometrium undergoes dramatic modifications necessary for its physical interactions with the trophoblast as well as the development of the conceptus. We aim to identify endometrial factors and pathways essential for a successful implantation in the caruncular [C] and the intercaruncular [IC] areas in cattle. Using a bovine oligo-array, expression profiles were established at day 20 of the estrous cycle or pregnancy (implantation) showing 446 and 1295 differentially expressed genes (DEG) in [C] and [IC] areas respectively. The impact of the conceptus was higher on the immune response function in [C] but more prominent on the regulation of metabolism function in [IC]. Keywords: Fluorescence Microarray 18 intercaruncular samples, 18 caruncular Samples. Comparisons of cycle (d20) and pregnancy (d20).
2010-06-24 | E-GEOD-13664 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE14047: Comparison between caruncles and intercaruncles in AI, IVF-ET and SCNT pregnancies GSE14050: AI versus IVF-ET & AI versus SCNT Refer to individual Series
2009-10-31 | E-GEOD-14638 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Development of mammary secretory epithelium and its functional differentiation occur during pregnancy under combined actions of ovarian steroids, pituitary hormones and growth factors. If the effect of these molecules is relatively well known, effect of differentiation factors expressed locally is not enough characterized. To understand local regulation of mammary tissue development and differentiation we realized transcriptional analysis on 5 physiological stages (4 during pregnancy and 1 during lactation). An appropriate experimental design was drawn to follow gene expression profiles during differentiation of mammary tissue. Results showed that at mid-pregnancy, mammary tissue was enough defferentiated into secretory epithelium to express milk protein genes and genes of the immune response system actors. But the secretoty activation of mammary epithelium was done only after parturition and wwas characterized by the expression of lipidogenesis genes. Keywords: time course, mammary gland differentiation, goat, pregnancy 18 samples, loop design
2010-05-16 | E-GEOD-14008 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:[Submitter has not provided a description of the experiment]
2004-02-25 | E-GEOD-1065 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A mouse hepatoma cell line (Hepa1-6 cells, ATCC) was grown in T-25 tissue culture flasks (Corning) at 37ºC in 5% CO2 under two conditions. The first condition was the control, which contained DMEM medium (Gibco BRL) with 25 mM glucose, 4 mM glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma), and 10% CPSR-3 (Sigma). The second condition was identical to the first, however the glutamine concentration was altered periodically. Once the cells had grown to confluency, the experiment began at 9:30 PM by exchanging the medium in all flasks. The control flasks received the same medium, containing 4 mM glutamine, while the experimental flasks received identical medium with no glutamine. Twenty-four hours later, the medium was exchanged again, however this time all flasks received medium containing 4 mM glutamine. The first medium exchange was repeated at 48 hours into the experiment, while the second was repeated at 72 hours into the experiment. Hence the glutamine concentration of the experimental flasks oscillated between 0 mM and 4 mM glutamine over 96 hours, while the glutamine concentration of the control flasks remained constant at 4 mM glutamine. At regular intervals, the flasks were sampled. Total RNA was isolated, medium samples were retained, and isotopic measurements were performed from flasks fed different labelled compounds. All samples taken during the experiment were analyzed. The total RNA harvested was labeled and hybridized to DNA microarrays to measure the abundance of transcripts present. Total RNA control samples were labeled using Cy3 dCTP (Perkin-Elmer), and total RNA experimental samples were labeled using Cy5 dCTP (Perkin-Elmer) during reverse transcription. For reverse transcription 10 ug of total RNA was aliquoted into a 6 uL volume. If concentration of the RNA was necessary, this was conducted using a speed vacufuge (Eppendorf) at 60ºC for 10 minutes. The RNA sample was then mixed with 2 uL of 10X Cy-labeled dCTP, 2 uL of 100 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 4 uL of 5X First Strand Buffer (Invitrogen), 2 uL of a dNTP mixture containing 5 mM dGTP, dATP, dTTP and 2 mM dCTP (Invitrogen), 2 uL of 0.5 mg/ mL oligo-dT18-20 (Invitrogen), and 2 uL of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). This reaction mixture was incubated at 42ºC for approximately two hours. Following the reverse transcription reaction, the RNA template was degraded by addition of 2 uL of 1 N NaOH and incubation at 65 ºC for 10 minutes. The alkaline conditions were then neutralized by addition of 2 uL of 1 N HCl. Samples from identical time points that were to be compared on DNA microarrays were then mixed. The combined sample was cleaned to remove extra primers and nucleotides using a QIAquick Nucleotide Removal kit as described by the manufacturer's instructions. Once cleaned, the sample was concentrated using a speed vacufuge (Eppendorf) for 20 minutes at 65ºC. Following concentration, the sample was resuspended in 32 uL of prewarmed hybridization buffer (Clontech Laboratories), 1 uL was removed for quantitation, and hybridized to prepared oligonucleotide microarrays. Hybridization occurred overnight at 55 ºC using Corning hybridization chambers. The following day the arrays were washed in Glass Hybridization Wash Solution (Clontech Laboratories), and then in 1X SSC, and finally 0.1X SSC. Each wash step was conducted for 20 minutes under high agitation. The arrays were dried by centrifugation and scanned using GenePix 4000B scanner (Axon Instruments). The resulting data was downloaded and formatted in Excel (Microsoft), and then analyzed using Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc.). The arrays used for hybridization were prepared using GAPS glass slides (Corning), and a Virtek arrayer (Bio-Rad). These arrays contained 17,280 features, printed from a synthesized oligonucleotide mouse library (Operon). Briefly, the library was resuspended in 3X SSC, centrifuged, and loaded into the arrayer. Arrays were printed using 32 pins (Telechem), at approximately 50% humidity. Once printed, the probes were crosslinked to the glass slides using a UV Stratalinker (Stratagene). The slides were then blocked for 15 minutes in a 250 mL mixture containing 15.7 g/ L succinic anhydride, 239 mL 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, and 10.7 mL of 1 M boric acid, pH 8.0. They were cleaned by rinsing in 250 mL of milli-Q water (X2), followed by 250 mL of 95% ethanol. They were finally dried using filtered air and stored in the dark at room temperature. Keywords = mouse, liver, hepatoma, cell culture, glutamine, carbon metabolism
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-404 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Examination of cotyledons after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days on 40mg/L 2,4-D.
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-136 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Whole-genome screening of CpG Island methylation status by array-based profiling of absolute methylation status (array-PAMS). Methylation-specifically digested DNA (Cy3) was hybridized against methylation-sensitively digested DNA (Cy5) from the same sample. CGI methylation in 20 pediatric medulloblastomas (M) and normal cerebellum (Cb, pool of five unaffected donors, age 25â33 years)
2010-06-30 | E-GEOD-4857 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A maize array was fabricated with 5,376 unique expressed sequence tag (EST) clones sequenced from 4-day-old roots, immature ears and adult organ cDNA libraries. To elucidate organ relationships, relative mRNA levels were quantified by hybridization with embryos, three maize vegetative organs (leaf blades, leaf sheaths and roots) from multiple developmental stages, husk leaves and two types of floral organs (immature ears and silks). Clustering analyses of the hybridization data suggest that maize utilizes both the PEPCK and NADP-ME C(4) photosynthetic routes as genes in these pathways are co-regulated. Husk RNA has a gene-expression profile more similar to floral organs than to vegetative leaves. Only 7% of the genes were highly organ specific, showing over a fourfold difference in at least one of 12 comparisons and 37% showed a two- to fourfold difference. The majority of genes were expressed in diverse organs with little difference in transcript levels. Cross-hybridization among closely related genes within multigene families could obscure tissue specificity. As a first step in elucidating individual gene-expression patterns, we show that 45-nucleotide oligo probes produce signal intensities and signal ratios comparable to PCR probes on the same matrix. Gene-expression profile studies with cDNA microarrays provide a new molecular tool for defining plant organs and their relationships and for discovering new biological processes in silico. cDNA microarrays are insufficient for differentiating recently duplicated genes. Gene-specific oligo probes printed along with cDNA probes can query individual gene-expression profiles and gene families simultaneously.
2003-01-07 | E-GEOD-141 | biostudies-arrayexpress