CGH analysis of chemical induced pluripotent stem cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
SUBMITTER: chun liu
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-48231 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of CiPSCs (clone CiPS-57 and CiPS-58) and OSKM-iPSCs. C57BL/6 mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) genome DNA as a reference. No consistent copy number variations (CNVs) among CiPSCs and OSKM-iPSCs.
2013-07-22 | GSE48231 | GEO
Project description:The genomic DNA sample of AG-haESCs were compared to the C57BL/6J male mouse kidney by comparative genomic hybridization. The data confirmed that the haploid cells sustained genome integrity. The analysis was performed on a NimbleGen Mouse CGH 3x720K Whole-Genome Tiling Array to analyse the copy number variations in AG-haESCs, and the genomic DNA of C57BL/6J male mouse kidney was used as control, which had the same background with haploid ESCs.
2012-04-26 | E-GEOD-35786 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells was done with 129/Sv male mouse kidney genomic DNA as reference. The results revealed no consistent copy number variations (CNVs) among the examined cell lines (AH129-5, AH129-N1 and AH129-NC1), except for the global difference on the X chromosome to the male control. Genomic DNA of FACS sorted G0/G1 stage ahES cells was compared with 129/Sv male mouse kidney genomic DNA reference by the NimbleGen Mouse CGH 3x720K Whole-Genome Tiling Array (Build MM9) [100718_MM9_WG_CGH_HX3]
2012-08-30 | E-GEOD-39390 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:DNA samples of haploid ES cells and control DNA were compared to genomic DNA of the C57B/6 inbred mouse strain on a NimbleGen Mouse CGH 3x720K Whole-Genome Tiling Array (Build MM9), (GPL10989) DNA samples of haploid ES cells and control DNA were compared to genomic DNA of the 129/Sv inbred mouse strain on a NimbleGen Mouse CGH 3x720K Whole-Genome Tiling Array (Build MM9), (GPL10989)
2011-07-23 | GSE30749 | GEO
Project description:Pluripotent stem cells can be induced from somatic cells, providing an unlimited cell resource for regenerative medicine. However, genetic manipulation and difficult-to-manufacture strategies used in reprogramming limit their clinical applications. Here, we show pluripotency can be induced from mouse somatic cells by specific small-molecule compounds. The completely chemically-induced pluripotent stem cells (CiPSCs) can be stably maintained in embryonic stem cell (ESC) culture medium and resemble ESCs in terms of their gene expression profiles, epigenetic status, and potential for differentiation and germline transmission. These findings suggest that exogenous master genes are dispensable for cell fate reprogramming and pave the way for the clinical application of somatic reprogramming techniques. Pluripotent stem cells can be induced from somatic cells, providing an unlimited cell resource for regenerative medicine. However, genetic manipulation and difficult-to-manufacture strategies used in reprogramming limit their clinical applications. Here, we show pluripotency can be induced from mouse somatic cells by specific small-molecule compounds. The completely chemically-induced pluripotent stem cells (CiPSCs) can be stably maintained in embryonic stem cell (ESC) culture medium and resemble ESCs in terms of their gene expression profiles, epigenetic status, and potential for differentiation and germline transmission. These findings suggest that exogenous master genes are dispensable for cell fate reprogramming and pave the way for the clinical application of somatic reprogramming techniques. Chemicals' acronyms: V, VPA; C, CHIR; 6, 616452; T, tranylcypromine; F, FSK; Z, DZNep; P, PGE2; R, RG108; S, SRT1720; M, 2-Me-5HT; D, D4476; B, Sodium butyrate. To compare the global gene expression pofile of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), mouse adult lung fibroblasts (MAFs), mouse neonatal fibroblasts (MNFs), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), chemical induced pluripotent stem cells (CiPS), embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and OSKM-iPSCs. We profiled the mRNA expression of each sample by microarray (Mouse OneArray® v2, Phalanx). Different sample set was normalized for different purpose. Set1: MEFs1, CiPS34, MNF CIPS7, CiPS50 CiPS21, OSKM-iPS1 and ESCs1 were analyzed, each sample have three replicates; Set2: MNFs, MAFs, ADSCs, MNF CiPS1, MAF CiPS3, CiPS45, ADSC CiPS2, OSKM iPS2 and ESCs2 were analyzed, each sample have three replicates; Set3: WT MEFs, ESCs3, CiPS WT1 and CiPS WT2 were analyzed, each sample have two replicates; Set4: MEFs2, SKM-FSK1, SKM-FSK2 and ESCs4 were analyzed, each sample have three replicates; Set5: MEFs3, ESCs5, CiPSCs, D12, D20 and D32 were analyzed, each sample have two replicates.
2013-07-22 | E-GEOD-48201 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are commonly generated by transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc (OSKM) into somatic cells. Though iPSCs are pluripotent, they frequently exhibit high variation in their quality as measured by chimera contribution and tetraploid (4n) complementation. Thus, improving the quality of iPSCs is an indispensable prerequisite for future iPSC-based therapy. Here we show that one major determinant for iPSCs quality is the combination of reprograming factor selected. Ectopic expression of Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb and Lin28 (SNEL) in MEFs efficiently generated high quality iPSCs as compared to other combinations of factors. SNEL-iPSCs produced approximately 5 times more efficiently “all-iPSC” mice compared to OSKM-iPSCs. While differentially methylated regions, transcript number of master regulators, establishment of ESC-specific super enhancers, and global aneuploidy were comparable between the lines, aberrant expression of 1,765 genes, trisomy of chromosome 8 and abnormal H2A.X deposition were frequently observed in poor quality OSK-iPSCs and OSKM-iPSCs. Whole-genome single-base resolution MethylC sequencing collected from a variety of Mouse pluripotent cells To reveal the DNA methylation signature associated with developmental competence, we selected the following groups of iPSC lines for whole-genome bisulfite sequencing: i) "Poor quality" iPSCs: This group included the three OSKM-iPSC lines Nanog-GFP OSKM#2, Oct4-GFP OSKM#2 and KH2 OSKM(Stadtfeld et al., 2010), that either did not produce fully developed pups or produced very low number of pups; ii) "Good quality" iPSCs: This group included BC_2 OSKM (Carey et al., 2011) and Nanog-GFP SNEL#3, both of which gave rise to live, normal pups that survived only few hours; iii) "High quality" iPSCs consisting of Nanog-GFP SNEL#2 and Oct4-GFP SNEL#1, both of which generated live pups that survived postnatally (representative pups from each iPSC group are shown in Figure S3A). iv) As controls we used Nanog-GFP, Oct4-GFP and KH2 (Beard et al., 2006) ESCs. Note that all cells were cultured in 2i medium but not in mES medium.
2014-07-30 | E-GEOD-59696 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are commonly generated by transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc (OSKM) into somatic cells. Though iPSCs are pluripotent, they frequently exhibit high variation in their quality as measured by chimera contribution and tetraploid (4n) complementation. Thus, improving the quality of iPSCs is an indispensable prerequisite for future iPSC-based therapy. Here we show that one major determinant for iPSCs quality is the selection of the reprogramming factors combination. Ectopic expression of Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb and Lin28 (SNEL) in MEFs efficiently generated high quality iPSCs as compared to other combinations of factors. SNEL-iPSCs produced approximately 5 times more efficiently “all-iPSC” mice compared to OSKM-iPSCs. While differentially methylated regions, transcript number of master regulators, establishment of ESC-specific super enhancers, and global aneuploidy were comparable between the lines, aberrant expression of 1,765 genes, trisomy of chromosome 8 and abnormal H2A.X deposition were frequently observed in poor quality OSKM-iPSCs. For high-quality iPSCs, H2A.X pattern of SNEL is most similar to that of ESC, OSK and OSKM have more devoid regions than SNEL iPSCs. Compare H2A.X deposition pattern of the OSKM 4-factor iPS cell lines (4N-), SNEL 4-factor iPS cell lines (4N+) with ChIP-Seq. The same background ES cell line as the control line.
2014-09-07 | E-GEOD-55731 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are commonly generated by transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc (OSKM) into somatic cells. Though iPSCs are pluripotent, they frequently exhibit high variation in their quality as measured by chimera contribution and tetraploid (4n) complementation. Thus, improving the quality of iPSCs is an indispensable prerequisite for future iPSC-based therapy. Here we show that one major determinant for iPSCs quality is the selection of the reprogramming factors combination. Ectopic expression of Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb and Lin28 (SNEL) in MEFs efficiently generated high quality iPSCs as compared to other combinations of factors. SNEL-iPSCs produced approximately 5 times more efficiently “all-iPSC” mice compared to OSKM-iPSCs. While differentially methylated regions, transcript number of master regulators, establishment of ESC-specific super enhancers, and global aneuploidy were comparable between the lines, aberrant expression of 1,765 genes, trisomy of chromosome 8 and abnormal H2A.X deposition were frequently observed in poor quality OSKM-iPSCs. For high-quality iPSCs, H2A.X pattern of SNEL is most similar to that of ESC, OSK and OSKM have more devoid regions than SNEL iPSCs.
2014-09-07 | GSE55731 | GEO
Project description:Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are commonly generated by transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc (OSKM) into somatic cells. Though iPSCs are pluripotent, they frequently exhibit high variation in their quality as measured by chimera contribution and tetraploid (4n) complementation. Thus, improving the quality of iPSCs is an indispensable prerequisite for future iPSC-based therapy. Here we show that one major determinant for iPSCs quality is the combination of reprograming factor selected. Ectopic expression of Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb and Lin28 (SNEL) in MEFs efficiently generated high quality iPSCs as compared to other combinations of factors. SNEL-iPSCs produced approximately 5 times more efficiently M-bM-^@M-^\all-iPSCM-bM-^@M-^] mice compared to OSKM-iPSCs. While differentially methylated regions, transcript number of master regulators, establishment of ESC-specific super enhancers, and global aneuploidy were comparable between the lines, aberrant expression of 1,765 genes, trisomy of chromosome 8 and abnormal H2A.X deposition were frequently observed in poor quality OSK-iPSCs and OSKM-iPSCs. ChIP-Seq for Med1 in reprogrammed and partially reprogrammed mouse embryonic stem cell lines and corresponding controls
2014-07-30 | E-GEOD-59569 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are commonly generated by transduction of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc (OSKM) into somatic cells. Though iPSCs are pluripotent, they frequently exhibit high variation in their quality as measured by chimera contribution and tetraploid (4n) complementation. Thus, improving the quality of iPSCs is an indispensable prerequisite for future iPSC-based therapy. Here we show that one major determinant for iPSCs quality is the combination of reprograming factor selected. Ectopic expression of Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb and Lin28 (SNEL) in MEFs efficiently generated high quality iPSCs as compared to other combinations of factors. SNEL-iPSCs produced approximately 5 times more efficiently “all-iPSC” mice compared to OSKM-iPSCs. While differentially methylated regions, transcript number of master regulators, establishment of ESC-specific super enhancers, and global aneuploidy were comparable between the lines, aberrant expression of 1,765 genes, trisomy of chromosome 8 and abnormal H2A.X deposition were frequently observed in poor quality OSK-iPSCs and OSKM-iPSCs.
2014-07-30 | GSE59569 | GEO