Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Genome-wide binding of GATA1 and TAL1 determined at high resolution

ABSTRACT: Erythroid development and differentiation from multiprogenitor cells to red blood cells requires precise transcriptional regulation. Key erythroid transcription factors, GATA1 and TAL1, co-operate, along with other proteins, to regulate many aspects of this process. How GATA1 and TAL1 are positionally organized with respect to each other and their cognate DNA binding site across the mouse genome remains unclear. We applied high resolution ChIP-exo to GATA1 and TAL1 to study their positional organization across the mouse genome during GATA1-dependent maturation. Two complementary methods, MultiGPS and peak-pairing, were used to determine high confidence binding locations by ChIP-exo. We identified ~10,000 GATA1 and ~15,000 TAL1 locations, which were essentially confirmed by ChIP-seq. Of these, ~4,000 locations were bound by both GATA1 and TAL1. About three-quarters of these were tightly linked (<40 bp away) to a partial E-box located 7-8 bp upstream of a WGATAA motif. Both TAL1 and GATA1 generated distinct characteristic ChIP-exo peaks around WGATAA motifs, that reflect on their positional arrangement within a complex. We show that TAL1 and GATA1 form a precisely organized complex at a compound motif consisting of a TG 7-8 bp upstream of a WGATAA motif across thousands of genomic locations. Genome wide analysis of GATA1 and TAL1 in G1E and G1E-ER4 cells using ChIP-exo experiments

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

SUBMITTER: Bongsoo Park

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-68964 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Mitosis entails global alterations to chromosome structure and nuclear architecture, concomitant with transient silencing of transcription. How cells transmit transcriptional states through mitosis remains incompletely understood. While many nuclear factors dissociate from mitotic chromosomes, the observation that certain nuclear factors and chromatin features remain associated with individual loci during mitosis originated the hypothesis that they could provide transcriptional memory through mitosis. To obtain the first genome-wide view of the dynamics of chromatin structure during mitosis, we compared the DNase sensitivity of interphase and mitotic chromatin at two stages of cellular maturation in a rapidly dividingmurine erythroblastmodel. Despite global chromosome condensation visible during mitosis at the microscopic level, the chromatin accessibility landscape is largely unaltered. However, mitotic chromatin accessibility is locally dynamic, with individual loci maintaining none, some, or all of their interphase accessibility. Mitotic reduction in accessibility occurs primarily within narrow, highly hypersensitive sites that frequently coincide with transcription factor binding sites, whereas broader domains of moderate accessibility tend to be more stable. In mitosis, proximal promoters generally maintain their accessibility, whereas distal regulatory elements preferentially lose accessibility. Promoters with the highest degree of accessibility preservation in mitosis tend to also be accessible across many murine tissues in interphase. Transcription factor GATA1 exerts site-specific changes in interphase accessibility that are most pronounced at distal regulatory elements, but does not visibly influence mitotic accessibility. We conclude that features of open chromatin are remarkably stable through mitosis and are modulated at the level of individual genes and regulatory elements. Dnase-Seq data is integrated with Chip-seq [GSE36589, GSE30142] and RNA-seq to examine epigentic changes in mitosis. We performed DNase-seq on two cell lines, G1E and G1E-ER4, both on an asynchronus population, and on a sample of cells in mitosis; each of the 4 experiments in triplicate.

Dataset Information

Genome-wide binding of GATA1 and TAL1 determined at high resolution

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets