Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Validation study: Response-predictive gene expression profiling of glioma progenitor cells in vitro

ABSTRACT: Background. In a previous publication we introduced a novel approach to identify genes that hold predictive information about treatment outcome. A linear regression model was fitted by using the least angle regression algorithm (LARS) with the expression profiles of a construction set of 18 glioma progenitor cells enhanced for brain tumor initiating cells (BTIC) before and after in vitro treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Sunitinib. Profiles from treated progenitor cells allowed predicting therapy-induced impairment of proliferation in vitro. Prediction performance was validated in leave one out cross validation. Methods. In this study, we used an additional validation set of 18 serum-free short-term treated in vitro cell cultures to test the predictive properties of the signature in an independent cohort. We assessed proliferation rates together with transcriptome-wide expression profiles after Sunitinib treatment of each individual cell culture, following the methods of the previous publication. Results. We confirmed treatment-induced expression changes in our validation set, but our signature failed to predict proliferation inhibition. Conclusion. Although the gene signature published from our construction set exhibited good prediction accuracy in cross validation, we were not able to validate the signature in an independent validation data set. Reasons could be regression to the mean, the moderate numbers of samples, or too low differences in the response to proliferation inhibition. At this stage and based on the presented results, we conclude that the signature does not warrant further developmental steps towards clinical application. 40 samples; 18 brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs); 2 treatment conditions: 1 ÂµM Sunitinib or 0.00025% DMSO with supplementation of VEGF and PDGF-AB for 6 hours

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Sylvia Moeckel

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-76990 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The feasibility of longitudinal metastatic biopsies for gene expression profiling in breast cancer is unexplored. Dynamic changes in gene expression can potentially predict efficacy of targeted cancer drugs. Patients enrolled in a phase III trial of metastatic breast cancer with sunitinib combined with docetaxel (SU+DOC) versus docetaxel alone (DOC) were offered to participate in a translational substudy comprising longitudinal fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) and positron emission imaging before (T1) and two weeks after start of treatment (T2). Aspirated tumor material was used for microarray analysis, and treatment-induced changes (T2 versus T1) in gene expression and standardized uptake values were investigated. Twenty-one patients were included in the docetaxel ± sunitinib trial at Karolinska and 18 of them agreed to participate in the substudy. Of the 18 women enrolled, 8 were randomly assigned to SU+DOC and 10 to DOC. Metastatic FNAB were carried out in 17 of the 18 patients at both time points with no complications reported. Representative tumor material, sufficient for RNA extraction was obtained in 15 patients at T1 and 14 patients at T2. Matched samples both at T1 and T2 were obtained for 14 subjects, 7 in each arm. The main objective was to determine whether gene expression profiling is feasible using sequential, intra-patient FNAB. Secondary objectives were to identify potential biomarkers of early response by gene expression and/or functional imaging and to explore drug action in vivo by changes in gene expression. A Karolinska substudy of the docetaxel ± sunitinib phase III clinical trial utilising sequential metastatic fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) and 18-F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT). In brief, the randomized docetaxel ± sunitinib trial compared sunitinib combined with docetaxel (SU+DOC) versus docetaxel alone (DOC), as first line therapy in patients with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients in the exploratory substudy were subjected to baseline FDG PET/CT assessment, followed by FNAB of one tumor lesion prior to start of treatment (Time point T1). FDG PET/CT and FNAB were repeated at Day 14 ± 1 (Time point T2) when sunitinib has achieved steady state.

Dataset Information

Validation study: Response-predictive gene expression profiling of glioma progenitor cells in vitro

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets