Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Drosophila Schneider cells using antibodies against HP1a

ABSTRACT: Preparation of nuclear extracts

D. melanogaster Schneider cells were prepared as previously described by Andrews and Faller (1991). Briefly, in a typical preparation, 8x106 cells (grown in Schneider medium plus 10% fetal calf serum; GIBCO-BRL) were pelleted and resuspended in 1,5 mL cold PBS1X; the cell suspension is then tranferred to a microfuge tube. Cells are pelleted for 10 seconds and resuspended in 400 M-5L cold Buffer A (10mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.9 at 4M-0C, 1.5mM MgCl2, 10mM KCl, 0.5mM duthiothreitol, 0.2mM PMSF, 0.2U/microL RNasin). The cells are allowed to swell on ice for 10 minutes, and then vortexed for 10 seconds. Samples are centrifuged for 10 seconds, and the supernatant fraction is discarded. The pellet is resuspended in 100 M-5L of cold Buffer C (20mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 420mM NaCl, 1.5mM MgCl2, 0.2mM EDTA, 0.5mM dithiothreitol, 0.2mM PMSF) and incubated on ice for 20 min for high-salt extraction. Cellular debris is removed by centrifugation for 2 min at 4M-0C and the supernatant fraction is stored at M-^V70M-0C. All buffers were prepared from double-distilled autoclaved water that had been treated with 0.1% DEPC (Sigma).

RNA immunoprecipitation and Reverse Transcription

For RNA immunopreciptation, the nuclear extract was incubated whit 50M-5g of monoclonal C1A9 anti HP1 antibody and the mixture was kept at 4M-0C overnight under continuous gentle movement. One-hundred microliters ofprotein G-Sepharose (Sigma) suspension (50% packed Sepharose in Buffer C) was added and the incubation was continued overnight as described.The beads were pelleted by 2 min centrifugation at 240 g at 4M-0C; the pellet was washed briefly three times whit each 1mL of IP Wash Solution (150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris pH 7.5, 0.5% NP40) and the Sepharose was transferred for eluition into a fresh plastic tube , pelleted again and then the supernatant was removed completely. To elute the immunocomplexes for protein analysis, an aliquot of beads were suspended in 50M-5L SDS-PAGE sample buffer and incubated for 10 min at 90M-0C; following centrifugation the supernatant was removed and used for Western blot for testing the presence of HP1 protein.
To elute the immunoprecipitated RNAs, the pelleted beads were boiled in 200M-5L of DEPC wather for 5 min, spun, and the supernatant recovered; 1mL of Trizol (Invitrogen) was added to 200 M-5L of supernatant and mixed well, followed by the addition of 200M-5L of chloroform. This mixture was incubated at 4M-0C for 5 min and then centrifuged at 12000 g for 15 min; the RNAs in the aqueous phase was precipitated whit half volume of isopropanol; after precipitation, the RNAs was resuspend in 10M-5L of DEPC wather. Contaminating DNA was digested whit RNase-free DNase I (Sigma). The RNA purified from the previous step is used as a template to synthesize cDNA using oligo dT , random hexamers and SuperScript reverse transcriptase III (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

cDNA amplification and labeling

The cDNA was used as template for a two-step random PCR amplification; in Round A, Sequenase is used to extend randomly annealed primers (Primer A) to generate templates for subsequent PCR; during Round B, the specific primer B is used to aplify the templates previously generated and finally round C consist of additional PCR cycles to inorporate the amino allyl dUTP nucleotide.
About 25 ng of each cDNA sample was used for two 8 min extension with 2,7 mM Round A primer (5M-^R-GTT TCC CAG TCA CGA TCN NNN NNN NN-3M-^R, N being a mixture of all four nucleotides with 60% A+T and 40% G+C) at 37M-0C with 267U/ml Sequenase version 2.0 (usb). DNA was denatured at 94M-0C for 2 min and cooled to 10M-0C , and Sequenase 2.0 was added between extensions. The resulting products were used as template for 25 cycles of PCR using 1U/100M-5l Taq polymerase (Platinum Taq Invitrogen) and 10mM Round B primer (5M-^R-GTT TCC CAG TCA CGA TC-3M-^R). Finally this DNA was used as template for 25 cycles PCR to inorporate the amino allyl dUTP nucleotides to which the fluorescent dye may then be attached. To remove Tris buffer which interferes with the indirect coupling, the aminoallyl-cDNA samples were desalted by filtering through a Microcon M-^V30 and then mixed with the succinimidyl esters of the Cy3 or Cy5 dyes (Amersham Biosciences) in 0,1M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 9); the coupling reaction was icubated overnight in the dark at room temperature.
Each dye labeled sample was purified by AutoSeq MicroSpin G-50 columns (Amersham Biosciences) following the manufacterers directions.

Microarrays Hybridization and washing

The dried labeled cDNAs pellet were resuspended in 80M-5l of DIG Easy Hyb (Roche) hybridization buffer containg 0,5 mg/ml yeast tRNa and 0,5 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA. Finally the DNA probe was denaturated by incubation at 65M-0C for 10 min and, after a brief centrifugation to spin down the drops, the mixture was pipetted onto a microarray; a coverslip was applied and the slide was placed in a microarray hybridation chamber (BioRad) and incubated overnight at 37M-0C.
After hybridization, the slide was submerged in 0,01% SDS, 1%SSC until the coverslip slipped off the surface; The slide was transferred to a solution of 1%SSC and shaken at 50M-0C for 10 min, then washed once more by shaking in 0,1%SSC.
Slide was dried by centrifugation for 3 min at 550 rpm and scanned with an ScanArray Lite Microarray Scanner (Packard Bioscience) with laser intensities chosen to maximize signals while avoiding pixel saturation.
ScanArray express softwere was used to quantify hybridation signals; bad spots were flagged automatically by softwere and subsequently each slide was inspected manually.

ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster

SUBMITTER: Lucia Piacentini

PROVIDER: E-MEXP-1556 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To investigate the regulatory mechanisms governing the malignant signature of different gliomas we analyzed microRNA expression profiles in human tumor samples of world health organization (WHO) grade I (benign tumors), II (low grade tumors) and IV (high grade tumors) and from primary cultures obtained from tumor samples of grade II and IV. Patients This study included tumor samples histologically verified as astrocytic gliomas obtained from patients who had undergone craniotomy for microsurgical tumor removal. According to the revised WHO classification, tumors were diagnosed as: grade I or pilocytic astrocytomas; grade II or diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas; grade IV or glioblastoma multiforme. Primary cell cultures from grade II and grade IV gliomas were also obtained and miRNA expression in these cultures were analyzed RNA extraction Total RNA, including small RNA, was isolated from tissue samples using the mirVanaTM miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion) following the standard protocol. The quantity and quality of the purified RNA was evaluated by spectrophotometric analysis and electrophoresis on denaturing gel of acrylamide. Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) The miRNAs were first converted to cDNA using Multiplex RT for TaqMan Array Human MicroRNA Panel. The RT Master mix included 100 mM each of dNTPs , 50 U/ml MultiScrabe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems), 20 U/M-BM-5l RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems) and 10X RT Buffer. The 10 M-BM-5l reactions, including 7 M-BM-5l of RT master mix, 2 M-BM-5l of purified microRNA and 1 M-BM-5l of Multiplex RT Human primer pool (Applied Biosystem), were incubated in ice for 5 min and then in a thermal cycler for 30 min at 16M-BM-0C, 30 min at 42M-BM-0C, 5 min at 85M-BM-0C, and then hold at 4M-BM-0C. miRNA levels were normalized to the expression of small nucleolar RNAs, RNU44, RNU48 and RNU6B. All reverse transcriptase reactions, including no-template controls and RT controls, were run in duplicate. Real-time PCR was performed using a standard TaqMan PCR kit procedure on an M-bM-^@M-^\Real Time Fast 7900 HTM-bM-^@M-^] PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The 100 M-BM-5l PCR included 50 M-BM-5l RT product (before diluited 1:60) and 50 M-BM-5l TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2X) (Applied Biosystems). The total volume were loaded into Card TaqMan Low Density Array Human MicroRNA Panel (Applied Biosystem) including a total of 384 human microRNAs publicated on databases www.sanger.ac.uk. The reaction cards was runned at 50M-BM-0C for 2 min and 95M-BM-0C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 97M-BM-0C for 30s and 59,7M-BM-0C for 1 min. All reactions were run in triplicate. Analysis of data was performed using the SDS 2.3 software using the 2-M-bM-^HM-^FM-bM-^HM-^FCt (relative quantitative) method . The M-bM-^HM-^FCt of every miRNA was determined in relation to the endogenous control RNA U6 that was invariably expressed in all samples. The M-bM-^HM-^FM-bM-^HM-^FCt value was determined in relation to the calibrator, namely the normal brain tissue. Resulting data were grouped according to the tumor grading e selectioned using a cut-off value of 3. Results were expressed as M-bM-^@M-^\fold changeM-bM-^@M-^] over normal brain tissue. We analyzed two samples of grade I, two samples of grade II, two samples of grade IV gliomas. Four samples form norma brain were used as norma control. Primary cell cultures form grade II and grade IV samples were used for the analysis. All reverse transcriptase reactions, including no-template controls and RT controls, were run in triplicate.

Project description:RNA pull-down assay. For the recombinant protein pull-down assays, 50 M-5g of recombinant His-tag TcRBP40 protein were bound to 100 uL of Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen) overnight at 4M-0C. 100 M-5g of total RNA from epimastigotes were incubated with the bound protein in 500 M-5l EMSA buffer at 4M-0C for 2 h, in the presence of Heparine and Spermidine as competitors. Bounded and supernatant samples were separated. The bound sample was washed with the same buffer three times, soft-mixing for 10 min each. After washing, RNA present in the bound and supernatantM- fractions were purified. RNA purification and amplification: RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). Linearly amplified RNA (aRNA) was generated with the MessageAmpM-^YII aRNA Amplification kit (Ambion), according to the manufacturerM-^Rs manual. Microarray analysis: The microarray was constructed with 70-mer oligonucleotides. Due to the hybrid and repetitive nature of the sequenced T. cruzi strain, all coding regions (CDS) identified in the genome (version 3) were retrieved and clustered by the BLASTClust program, using parameters of 40% coverage and 75% identity. For probe design, it was used ArrayOligoSelector software (v. 3.8.1), with a parameter of 50% G+C content. Was obtained 10,359 probes for the longest T. cruzi CDS of each cluster, 393 probes corresponded to the genes of an external group (Cryptosporidium hominis) and 64 spots contained only spotting solution (SSC 3x), given 10,816 spots in total. These oligonucleotides were spotted from a 50 M-5M solution onto poly-L-lysine coated slides and cross-linked with 600 mJ UV. Each probe corresponding to the T. cruzi genes was identified according to the T. cruzi Genome Consortium annotation (www.genedb.org). We compared bound and unbound mRNA, extracted from two independent pull-down assays, in a dye-swap design including four slides. Microarray images were analyzed by Spot software (Spot). The Limma package (Smyth GK, 2004) was used for background correction by the normexp method, intra-slide normalization by the printtiploess method and inter-slide normalization by the quantile method. The results for the two intra-slide probe replicates were then averaged. The pull-down results were averaged, and probes displaying more than a two-fold difference between the bound and unbound fractions were selected, at FDR 1%.

Project description:The screen for genes involved in the spontaneous loss of heterozygosity mutagenesis (SLM) in diploid cells was done on the collections of deletion strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae created by the Saccharomyces Genome Deletion Project (http://www-sequence.stanford.edu/group/yeast_deletion_project/). Screens were performed on the pools of clones. Barcode microarrays were used to detect the increased SLM frequency leading to relative increase in abundance of deletion clone in a pool. Collections used were: Homozygous Diploid (HD) and Essential (E) mixed to create single HDE pool. Three mutagenesis markers were used: (1) naturally existing mating type locus, and two newly introduced markers, (2) CAN1/can1delta, (3) URA3/ura3delta. 1. To detect the increased SLM frequency at the mating type locus HDE pool was crossed to MATa or MATalpha strain. Deletion clones that gained mating competence due to loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the mating type locus gave rise to clones with the ability to grow on minimal medium. The relative abundance of these clones was compared to the abundance in the original HDE pool. 2. To detect the increased SLM frequency at the CAN1/can1delta locus the derivative HDE pool was created. Every cell of this pool had one of two copies of CAN1 gene deleted. The increased SLM frequency led to increased relative abundance of respective deletion clone under canavanine selection and could be estimated by comparing it to the abundance when pool was grown without selection. 3. To detect the increased SLM frequency at the URA3/ura3delta locus the derivative HDE pool was created. Every cell of this pool had one of two copies of URA3 gene deleted. The increased SLM frequency led to increased relative abundance of respective deletion clone under 5M-^R-fluoroorotic acid selection and could be estimated by comparing it to the abundance when pool was grown without selection. 4. For screens of SLM at CAN1 and URA3 markers the resistance control experiments were performed to detect genes whose deletion is sufficient to enable yeast cells with functional CAN1 or URA3 to grow in the presence of canavanine or 5M-^R- fluoroorotic acid respectively. 5. To include in the analysis slow-growing deletion clones control hybridizations were performed to detect genes whose deletion extends the doubling time of yeast cells.

Dataset Information

Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Drosophila Schneider cells using antibodies against HP1a

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets