Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

DNA-Protein Crosslink sequencing (DPC-seq) in RPE-1 cells treated with formaldehyde

ABSTRACT: Covalent DNA-protein crosslinks (DPC) are toxic DNA lesions that require repair by global-genome and replication-coupled pathways. How cells respond when RNA polymerases stall at DPCs during transcription is unknown. DPC-seq is new method for the genome-wide mapping of covalent DNA-protein adducts.

INSTRUMENT(S): Illumina HiSeq 1500, Illumina NovaSeq 6000, NextSeq 500

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Aldo Bader

PROVIDER: E-MTAB-12912 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To address the need to study frozen clinical specimens using next-generation RNA, DNA, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing and protein analyses, we developed a biobank work flow to prospectively collect biospecimens from patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We describe our standard operating procedures and work flow to annotate pathologic results and clinical outcomes. We report quality control outcomes, nucleic acid yields of our RCC submissions (N=16) to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, as well as newer discovery platforms by describing mass spectrometry analysis of albumin oxidation in plasma and 6 ChIP sequencing libraries generated from nephrectomy specimens after histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) immunoprecipitation. From June 1, 2010, through January 1, 2013, we enrolled 328 patients with RCC. Our mean (SD) TCGA RNA integrity numbers (RINs) were 8.1 (0.8) for papillary RCC, with a 12.5% overall rate of sample disqualification for RIN <7. Banked plasma had significantly less albumin oxidation (by mass spectrometry analysis) than plasma kept at 25°C (P<.001). For ChIP sequencing, the FastQC score for average read quality was at least 30 for 91-95% of paired-end reads. In parallel, we analyzed frozen tissue by RNA sequencing and after genome alignments, only 0.2-0.4% of total reads failed the default quality check steps of Bowtie2, which was comparable to the disqualification ratio (0.1%) of the 786-O RCC cell line, prepared under optimal RNA isolation conditions. The overall correlation coefficients for gene expression between the Mayo Clinic vs. TCGA tissues ranged from 0.75 to 0.82. These data support the generation of high-quality nucleic acids for genomic analyses from banked RCC. Importantly, the protocol does not interfere with routine clinical care. Collections over defined time points during disease treatment further enhance collaborative efforts to integrate genomic information with outcomes. Examination of H3K36me3 in ccRCC

Project description:2×10^7 HL60 cells were treated with 10 uM ATRA for 2 and 5 days, and conducted Hi-C to study the chromosomal architecture. Cells were fixed by 1% formaldehyde (v/v) for 15 min at room temperature (RT) with slowly rotation. Cells were lysed by 550 μl lysis buffer (500 μl 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl, 0.2% Igepal CA-630 and 50 μl protease inhibitors) using a homogenizer, and harvested the chromatin at 5,000 rpm and washed twice. The pellet was added 1% SDS and incubated at 65 oC for 10 min, then quenched by Triton X-100. The chromatin was digested by 600 U MboI (NEB, Ipswich, USA) at 37 oC overnight. The next day, enzymes were inactivated by 10% SDS at 65 oC for 30 min, and the restriction fragment overhangs were filled in using biotin-14-dCTP and Klenow at 37 oC for 45 min, and the ligation was conducted in 7.61 ml ligation mix (745 μl 10% Triton X-100, 745 μl 10x ligation buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM MgCl2, 100 mM DTT), 80 μl 10 mg/ml BSA, 80 μl 100 mM ATP and 5.96 ml water) for 4 h at 16°C. The blunt-end Hi-C ligation was sonicated and pull down by streptavidin beads, then purified by ethanol. Hi-C library was prepared for paired ending sequencing using NEBNext® UltraTM DNA Library Prep Kit for Illuina® (NEB). For regular 3C ligation, after enzymes inactivation, 10 μl 1 U/μl T4 DNA ligase was added to incubate at 16°C overnight. The interaction was detected by qPCR using the specific 3C primers (Table 1) followed by DNA purification. Hi-C was conducted in PE-150. An iterative method for Hi-C mapping with initial length 30bp, if it fails to map uniquely, the next round of mapping for additional 20 bp continued, this procedure lasts until the full read length reaches 150bp. The Hi-C reads were mapped to the human reference genome (assembly GRCh38) using bowtie2 (v2.2.9). The reads mapped to the same restriction fragment, the reads less than 500bp and PCR duplicates were all removed. Hi-C contact maps were normalized using ICE.

Project description:We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the replication checkpoint via a mec1 mutation led to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins of replication, after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Furthermore, we have shown that chromosomes break at replication forks that have suffered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formation. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing ssDNA gaps have equal probability of producing double strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-Seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with NextGen sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during the recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of the said transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. Our model provides an explanation for a long-standing problem in chromosome biology: why different replication inhibitors produce different spectra of chromosome breakage? We propose that different inhibitors elicit different transcription responses as well as destabilize replication forks, and, when the two processes collide, ssDNA at the replication fork suffers further strand breakage, causing DSBs. We queried the yeast genome for DSBs after cells were treated with 200 mM hydroxyurea during S phase. Samples were collected from 1) cells synchronized in G1 phase by alpha factor; 2) cells released from G1 into medium containing 200 mM hydroxyurea for 1 h; 3) cells recovering in fresh medium without hydroxyurea for 1 h after the 1 h exposure to HU. These samples are referred to as G1, HU 1h, and R 1h, respectively. The strains from which the samples were collected are indicated following the time point, e.g. G1_MEC1 or R 1h_mec1. The experiment with mec1 was done twice (Experiments A and B) and that with MEC1 was done once (Experiment C). In addition, a control experiment of in vitro digestion with BamHI using the G1_mec1 sample (G1_BamHI) was performed.

Dataset Information

DNA-Protein Crosslink sequencing (DPC-seq) in RPE-1 cells treated with formaldehyde

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets