Dataset Information

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness in Recovery from Colorectal Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study examined whether a 4-week group-based mindfulness intervention would be superior in reducing psychological distress in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients compared to a psychoeducation and cognitive behavioural skills learning support active control group.

Methods

Patients with CRC were randomized via Computerised Permuted Block Randomisation to mindfulness or active control groups (2-h weekly sessions over 4 weeks). Outcomes were measured pre-intervention, and 8 weeks and 6 months post-baseline. The primary outcome was psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes were generic quality of life (QoL), disease specific QoL, mindfulness, and intervention credibility and acceptability.

Results

Sixty-eight participants were randomized to mindfulness (n=35) or active control group (n=33). Uptake of potentially eligible patients consenting was low (28.0%) and the dropout rate was 33.8%. Depression scores were reduced in both groups at week 8 (P=0.020). Control participants had greater improvement in generic mental QoL scores at week 8 than mindfulness (P=0.023). In disease specific QoL, there was reduction in impotence symptom in the mindfulness group (P=0.022) and reduction in faecal incontinence in the control group (P=0.019). The embarrassment symptom had a significantly lower increase in the mindfulness group at week 8 compared to the control group (P=0.009). Both groups rated the treatments as credible and acceptable.

Conclusions

Mindfulness was not superior to the active control group in terms of alleviating psychological distress but both treatments were associated with some improvements in depression. There was low uptake of both interventions. (Trial registration number: ACTRN12616001033437).

SUBMITTER: McCombie A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10027425 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness in Recovery from Colorectal Cancer.

McCombie Andrew A Jordan Jennifer J Mulder Roger R Dee Kishion K Ong Ee Lin EL Zimmermann Fernanda Fernandez FF Frampton Chris C Frizelle Frank F

Chinese journal of integrative medicine 20230321 7

<h4>Objective</h4>This study examined whether a 4-week group-based mindfulness intervention would be superior in reducing psychological distress in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients compared to a psychoeducation and cognitive behavioural skills learning support active control group.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with CRC were randomized via Computerised Permuted Block Randomisation to mindfulness or active control groups (2-h weekly sessions over 4 weeks). Outcomes were measured pre-intervention, and 8 ...[more]

PMID: 36941505

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) is notably high among patients following colorectal cancer surgery, highlighting the urgency for the prompt development of efficacious preventive and therapeutic approaches. Electroacupuncture (EA) represents an intervention modality that holds promise for the management of POGD. However, the existing empirical evidence substantiating its efficacy remains scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EA as a treatment for POGD in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsThis study is a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, named as CORRECT. CORRECT trial will recruit 300 participants diagnosed with colorectal cancer and about to undergo radical surgery across four sub-centers. The participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: the EA group, sham-electroacupuncture group, or control group, with a randomization ratio of 2:2:1. All groups will follow a standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. The EA group will receive EA at acupoints LI4, SJ6, ST36, and ST37, while the SA group will undergo sham-electroacupuncture. The treatments will be administered twice daily from the day of surgery until the fourth day after the operation. The primary endpoint is the time to first flatus, while secondary endpoints encompass time to first defecation, bowel sound emergence, initial water intake, duration of postoperative hospitalization, nausea and vomiting, pain levels, and blinded evaluations. Additional outcomes include medication usage and complication rates, et al. DISCUSSION: The CORRECT trial aims to provide high-quality evidence for the role of EA in the treatment of POGD following colorectal cancer surgery. It will contribute data towards the integration of acupuncture into ERAS protocols. Insights from the trial could help in tailoring treatment plans based on individual patient responses to EA, optimizing care on a case-by-case basis.Trial registrationClinical Trial Registry registration was approved by the ClinicalTrials.gov committee on November 2023 with the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06128785. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06128785?tab=history&a=1#study-details-card .

Project description:BackgroundProvider recommendation is a predictor of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.PurposeTo compare the effects of two clinic-based interventions on patient-provider discussions about CRC screening.DesignTwo-group RCT with data collected at baseline and 1 week post-intervention.Setting/participantsAfrican-American patients that were non-adherent to CRC screening recommendations (n=693) with a primary care visit between 2008 and 2010 in one of 11 urban primary care clinics.InterventionParticipants received either a computer-delivered tailored CRC screening intervention or a nontailored informational brochure about CRC screening immediately prior to their primary care visit.Main outcome measuresBetween-group differences in odds of having had a CRC screening discussion about a colon test, with and without adjusting for demographic, clinic, health literacy, health belief, and social support variables, were examined as predictors of a CRC screening discussion using logistic regression. Intervention effects on CRC screening test order by PCPs were examined using logistic regression. Analyses were conducted in 2011 and 2012.ResultsCompared to the brochure group, greater proportions of those in the computer-delivered tailored intervention group reported having had a discussion with their provider about CRC screening (63% vs 48%, OR=1.81, p<0.001). Predictors of a discussion about CRC screening included computer group participation, younger age, reason for visit, being unmarried, colonoscopy self-efficacy, and family member/friend recommendation (all p-values <0.05).ConclusionsThe computer-delivered tailored intervention was more effective than a nontailored brochure at stimulating patient-provider discussions about CRC screening. Those who received the computer-delivered intervention also were more likely to have a CRC screening test (fecal occult blood test or colonoscopy) ordered by their PCP.Trial registrationThis study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00672828.

Dataset Information

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness in Recovery from Colorectal Cancer.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness in Recovery from Colorectal Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets