Dataset Information

Perinatal outcomes among young donor oocyte recipients.

ABSTRACT:

Study question

Is the use of donor oocytes in women <35 years of age associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared to use of autologous oocytes?

Summary answer

Among fresh assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles performed in women under age 35, donor oocyte use is associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and stillbirth (when zero embryos were cryopreserved) as compared to autologous oocytes.

What is known already

Previous studies demonstrated elevated risk of poor perinatal outcomes with donor versus autologous oocytes during ART, primarily among older women.

Study design, size, duration

Retrospective cohort study using data reported to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ART Surveillance System (NASS) during the period from 2010 to 2015 in order to best reflect advances in clinical practice. Approximately 98% of all US ART cycles are reported to NASS, and discrepancy rates were <6% for all fields evaluated in 2015.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

We included all non-banking fresh and frozen ART cycles performed between 2010 and 2015 in women under age 35 using autologous or donor eggs. Cycles using cryopreserved eggs, donated embryos or a gestational carrier were excluded. Among fresh embryo transfer cycles, we calculated predicted marginal proportions to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between donor versus autologous oocyte use and stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery and low birth weight among singleton pregnancies or births. Stillbirth models were stratified by number of embryos cryopreserved. All models were adjusted for patient and treatment characteristics.

Main results and the role of chance

Among the 71 720 singleton pregnancies occurring during 2010-2015, singletons resulting from donor oocytes were more likely to be preterm (15.6% versus 11.0%; aRRs 1.39: CI 1.20-1.61) and have low birth weight (11.8% versus 8.8%; aRRs 1.34; CI 1.16-1.55) than those resulting from autologous oocytes. With zero embryos cryopreserved, donor versus autologous oocyte use was associated with increased risk for stillbirth (2.1% versus 0.6%; aRRs 3.73; CI 1.96-7.11); no association with stillbirth was found when ≥1 embryo was cryopreserved (0.54% versus 0.56%; aRR 1.15; CI 0.59-2.25).

Limitations, reasons for caution

The data come from a national surveillance system and is thus limited by the accuracy of the data entered by individual providers and clinics. There may be unmeasured differences between women using donor eggs versus their own eggs that could be contributing to the reported associations. Given the large sample size, statistically significant findings may not reflect clinically important variations.

Wider implications of the findings

Risks of preterm birth, low birth weight and stillbirth among singleton pregnancies using donor oocytes were increased compared to those using autologous oocytes. Further study regarding the pathophysiology of the potentially increased risks among donor oocyte recipient pregnancy is warranted.

Study funding/competing interest(s)

None.

Trial registration number

N/A.

SUBMITTER: Schwartz KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10072793 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Perinatal outcomes among young donor oocyte recipients.

Schwartz K M KM Boulet S L SL Kawwass J F JF Kissin D M DM

Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 20191201 12

<h4>Study question</h4>Is the use of donor oocytes in women <35 years of age associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared to use of autologous oocytes?<h4>Summary answer</h4>Among fresh assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles performed in women under age 35, donor oocyte use is associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and stillbirth (when zero embryos were cryopreserved) as compared to autologous oocytes.<h4>What is known already</h4>Prev ...[more]

PMID: 31750511

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study questionDo donor oocyte recipients benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)?Summary answerPGT-A did not improve the likelihood of live birth for recipients of vitrified donor oocytes, but it did avoid embryo transfer in cycles with no euploid embryos.What is known alreadyRelative to slow freeze, oocyte vitrification has led to increased live birth from cryopreserved oocytes and has led to widespread use of this technology in donor egg IVF programs. However, oocyte cryopreservation has the potential to disrupt the meiotic spindle leading to abnormal segregation of chromosome during meiosis II and ultimately increased aneuploidy in resultant embryos. Therefore, PGT-A might have benefits in vitrified donor egg cycles. In contrast, embryos derived from young donor oocytes are expected to be predominantly euploid, and trophectoderm biopsy may have a negative effect relative to transfer without biopsy.Study design, size, durationThis is a paired cohort study analyzing donor oocyte-recipient cycles with or without PGT-A performed from 2012 to 2018 at 47 US IVF centers.Participants/materials, setting, methodsVitrified donor oocyte cycles were analyzed for live birth as the main outcome measure. Outcomes from donors whose oocytes were used by at least two separate recipient couples, one couple using PGT-A (study group) and one using embryos without PGT-A (control group), were compared. Generalized estimating equation models controlled for confounders and nested for individual donors contributing to both PGT-A and non-PGT-A cohorts, enabling a single donor to serve as her own control.Main results and the role of chanceIn total, 1291 initiated recipient cycles from 223 donors were analyzed, including 262 cycles with and 1029 without PGT-A. The median aneuploidy rate per recipient was 25%. Forty-three percent of PGT-A cycles had only euploid embryos, whereas only 12.7% of cycles had no euploid embryos. On average 1.09 embryos were transferred in the PGT-A group compared to 1.38 in the group without PGT-A (P < 0.01). Live birth occurred in 53.8% of cycles with PGT-A versus 55.8% without PGT-A (P = 0.44). Similar findings persisted in cumulative live birth from per recipient cycle.Limitations, reasons for cautionPooled clinical data from 47 IVF clinics introduced PGT-A heterogeneity as genetic testing were performed using different embryology laboratories, PGT-A companies and testing platforms.Wider implications of the findingsPGT-A testing in donor oocyte-recipient cycles does not improve the chance for live birth nor decrease the risk for miscarriage in the first transfer cycle but does increase cost and time for the patient. Further studies are required to test if our findings can be applied to the young infertility patient population using autologous oocytes.Study funding/competing interest(s)No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.Trial registration numberN/A.

Project description:Study questionHow does ovarian stimulation in an oocyte donor affect the IVF cycle and obstetric outcomes in recipients?Summary answerHigher donor oocyte yields may affect the proportion of usable embryos but do not affect live birth delivery rate or obstetric outcomes in oocyte recipients.What is known alreadyIn autologous oocyte fresh IVF cycles, the highest live birth delivery rates occur when ~15-25 oocytes are retrieved, with a decline thereafter, perhaps due to the hormone milieu, with super-physiologic estrogen levels. There are scant data in donor oocyte cycles, wherein the oocyte environment is separated from the uterine environment.Study design, size, durationThis was a retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2015 of 350 oocyte donors who underwent a total of 553 ovarian stimulations and oocyte retrievals. The oocytes were vitrified and then distributed to 989 recipients who had 1745 embryo transfers. The primary outcome was live birth delivery rate, defined as the number of deliveries that resulted in at least one live birth per embryo transfer cycle.Participants/materials, setting, methodsThe study included oocyte donors and recipients at a donor oocyte bank, in collaboration with an academic reproductive endocrinology division. Donors with polycystic ovary syndrome and recipients who used gestational carriers were excluded. The donors all underwent conventional ovarian stimulation using antagonist protocols. None of the embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing. The average (mean) number of embryos transferred to recipients was 1.4 (range 1-3).Main results and the role of chancePer ovarian stimulation cycle, the median number of oocytes retrieved was 30 (range: 9-95). Among the 1745 embryo transfer cycles, 856 of the cycles resulted in a live birth (49.1%). There were no associations between donor oocyte yield and probability of live birth, adjusting for donor age, BMI, race/ethnicity and retrieval year. The results were similar when analyzing by mature oocytes. Although donors with more oocytes retrieved had a higher number of developed embryos overall, there was a relatively lower percentage of usable embryos per oocyte warmed following fertilization and culture. In our model for the average donor in the data set, holding all variables constant, for each additional five oocytes retrieved, there was a 4% (95% CI 1%, 7%) lower odds of fertilization and 5% (95% CI 2%, 7%) lower odds of having a usable embryo per oocyte warmed. There were no associations between donor oocyte yield and risk of preterm delivery (<37 weeks gestation) and low birthweight (<2500 g) among singleton infants.Limitations, reasons for cautionOvarian stimulation was exclusively performed in oocyte donors. This was a retrospective study design, and we were therefore unable to ensure proportional exposure groups. These findings may not generalizable to older or less healthy women who may be vitrifying oocytes for planned fertility delay. There remain significant risks to aggressive ovarian stimulation, including ovarian hyperstimulation. In addition, long-term health outcomes of extreme ovarian stimulation are lacking. Lastly, we did not collect progesterone levels and are unable to evaluate the impact of rising progesterone on outcomes.Wider implications of the findingsLive birth delivery rates remain high with varying amounts of oocytes retrieved in this donor oocyte model. In a vitrified oocyte bank setting, where oocytes are typically sent as a limited number cohort, recipients are not affected by oocyte yields.Study funding/competing interest(s)Additional REDCap grant support at Emory was provided through UL1 TR000424. Dr. Audrey Gaskins was supported in part by a career development award from the NIEHS (R00ES026648).

Project description:BackgroundLong-term kidney transplant survival at the population level is consistently favorable, but this survival varies widely at an individual level due to both recipient and donor factors. The distinct contribution of recipient and donor factors to individual post kidney transplant outcome remains unclear. Comparing outcomes in deceased donor (DD) recipients with potential but non-actualized living donors (DD1) to those recipients with actualized living donors (LD), and to DD recipients without potential living donors (DD0) may provide transplant candidates with more information about their own post-transplant prognosis.MethodsWe conducted an observational retrospective cohort study of kidney transplant candidates presenting to our centre for evaluation between 01/01/06 and 31/12/18, and who also received a transplant during that time. Patients were followed to 31/08/2019. Candidates were classified as DD0, DD1, or LD based on whether they had an identified living donor at the time of initial pre-transplant assessment, and if the donor actualized or not. Primary outcome was 5-year death-censored graft survival, adjusted for common pre- and post-transplant donor and recipient risk factors. Secondary outcomes analyzed included patient survival and graft function.ResultsThere were 453 kidney transplant recipients (LD = 136, DD1 = 83, DD0 = 234) who received a transplant during the study period. DD0 and DD1 did not differ in key donor organ characteristics. The 5-year death censored graft survival of DD1 was similar to LD (p = 0.19). DD0 graft survival was inferior to LD (p = 0.005), but also trended inferior to DD1 (p = 0.052). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, LD demonstrated similar 5-year graft survival to DD1 (HR for graft loss 0.8 [95% CI 0.25-2.6], p = 0.72) but LD graft survival was superior to DD0 (HR 0.34 [0.16-0.72], p = 0.005). The 5-year patient survival in DD1 was similar to LD (p = 0.26) but was superior to DD0 (p = 0.01).ConclusionsDD recipients with potential but non-actualized living donors exhibit similar mid-term graft and patient survival compared to LD recipients. Having an identified living donor at the time of pre-transplant assessment portends a favorable prognosis for the recipient.

Project description:ImportanceThe prevalence of oocyte donation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) has increased in the United States, but little information is available regarding maternal or infant outcomes to improve counseling and clinical decision making.ObjectivesTo quantify trends in donor oocyte cycles in the United States and to determine predictors of a good perinatal outcome among IVF cycles using fresh (noncryopreserved) embryos derived from donor oocytes.Design, setting, and participantsAnalysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ART Surveillance System, to which fertility centers are mandated to report and which includes data on more than 95% of all IVF cycles performed in the United States. Data from 2000 to 2010 described trends. Data from 2010 determined predictors.Main outcomes and measuresGood perinatal outcome, defined as a singleton live-born infant delivered at 37 weeks or later and weighing 2500 g or more.ResultsFrom 2000 to 2010, data from 443 clinics (93% of all US fertility centers) were included. The annual number of donor oocyte cycles significantly increased, from 10,801 to 18,306. Among all donor oocyte cycles, an increasing trend was observed from 2000 to 2010 in the proportion of cycles using frozen (vs fresh) embryos (26.7% [95% CI, 25.8%-27.5%] to 40.3% [95% CI, 39.6%-41.1%]) and elective single-embryo transfers (vs transfer of multiple embryos) (0.8% [95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%] to 14.5% [95% CI, 14.0%-15.1%]). Good perinatal outcomes increased from 18.5% (95% CI, 17.7%-19.3%) to 24.4% (95% CI, 23.8%-25.1%) (P < .001 for all listed trends). Mean donor and recipient ages remained stable at 28 (SD, 2.8) years and 41 (SD, 5.3) years, respectively. In 2010, 396 clinics contributed data. For donor oocyte cycles using fresh embryos (n = 9865), 27.5% (95% CI, 26.6%-28.4%) resulted in good perinatal outcome. Transfer of an embryo at day 5 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.04-1.32]) and elective single-embryo transfers (adjusted OR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.92-2.80]) were positively associated with good perinatal outcome; tubal (adjusted OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60-0.86]) or uterine (adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.94]) factor infertility and non-Hispanic black recipient race/ethnicity (adjusted OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.67]) were associated with decreased odds of good outcome. Recipient age was not associated with likelihood of good perinatal outcome.Conclusions and relevanceIn the United States from 2000 to 2010, there was an increase in number of donor oocyte cycles, accompanied by an increase in good outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the factors associated with less successful outcomes.

Dataset Information

Perinatal outcomes among young donor oocyte recipients.

Study question

Summary answer

What is known already

Study design, size, duration

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Main results and the role of chance

Limitations, reasons for caution

Wider implications of the findings

Study funding/competing interest(s)

Trial registration number

Publications

Perinatal outcomes among young donor oocyte recipients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets