Dataset Information

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with decreased ovarian reserve in women with overweight and obesity.

ABSTRACT:

Objective(s)

To evaluate the association between neighborhood disadvantage and ovarian reserve stratified by body mass index (BMI).

Design

Cross-sectional cohort study.

Setting

Single academic medical center.

Patient(s)

A total of 193 healthy reproductive-age women with regular menstrual cycles in the St. Louis, Missouri metropolitan area.

Intervention(s)

Residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood.

Main outcome measure(s)

Ovarian reserve as assessed by ovarian antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration.

Result(s)

Women (n = 193) ranged from 20 to 44 years. The majority had overweight or obesity (59%, n = 117) with mean BMI of 28±7 kg/m². Forty-eight women lived in the most disadvantaged neighborhood quartile, of which 75% had overweight or obesity, compared with 54% of the 145 women living in the 3 less disadvantaged neighborhood quartiles. When controlling for age, race, and smoking status, women with overweight or obesity living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods had significantly lower AMH compared with those living in the less disadvantaged neighborhoods. Antral follicle count did not differ among women with overweight or obesity by neighborhood of residence. Neighborhood disadvantage was not associated with ovarian reserve by AFC or AMH in women with normal weight or underweight status.

Conclusion(s)

Living in a socioeconomically deprived area is associated with lower markers of ovarian reserve among women with an elevated BMI.

SUBMITTER: Komorowski AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10079614 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with decreased ovarian reserve in women with overweight and obesity.

Komorowski Allison S AS Walter Jessica R JR Martin Caitlin E CE Bedrick Bronwyn S BS Riley Joan K JK Jungheim Emily S ES

Fertility and sterility 20221221 4

<h4>Objective(s)</h4>To evaluate the association between neighborhood disadvantage and ovarian reserve stratified by body mass index (BMI).<h4>Design</h4>Cross-sectional cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>Single academic medical center.<h4>Patient(s)</h4>A total of 193 healthy reproductive-age women with regular menstrual cycles in the St. Louis, Missouri metropolitan area.<h4>Intervention(s)</h4>Residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood.<h4>Main outcome measure(s)</h4>Ovarian reserve as assessed by o ...[more]

PMID: 36565977

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs a special reproductive hormone and ovarian reserve indicator, the role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in premenopausal women with breast cancer deserves further study.MethodsWe conducted an in-depth analysis of the data from the EGOFACT study (NCT02518191), a phase Ⅲ, randomized, controlled trial involving premenopausal female breast cancer patients in two parallel groups: chemotherapy with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa). Three hundred thirty premenopausal women aged 25-49 years with operable stage I to III breast cancer were included in this study. The characteristics of ovarian reserve changes marked by AMH in the EGOFACT study and the factors affecting ovarian function in premenopausal women with breast cancer were analyzed.ResultsThe AMH level of the chemotherapy alone group decreased gradually within one year, while the AMH level of the GnRHa group was significantly higher as early as 6 months after chemotherapy and recovered to close to the baseline level 12 months after chemotherapy (F = 34.991, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed that the factors affecting AMH levels mainly included age, menarche age, body mass index (BMI), reproductive history, baseline follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level, pathological stage and GnRHa application, but they had different effects on the incidence of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) at different periods. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that menarche age younger than 14 years (OR 0.470 [0.259, 0.852], P = 0.013), baseline AMH level higher than 0.5 ng/mL (OR 9.590 [3.366, 27.320], P < 0.001), pathological stage Ⅰ(OR 0.315 [0.124, 0.798], P = 0.015) and GnRHa application (OR 0.090 [0.045, 0.183], P < 0.001) were independent factors conducive to protection of ovarian reserve, as well as to recovery of ovarian reserve.ConclusionsAge, menarche age, baseline AMH level, and GnRHa application are the most important influencing factors for ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with breast cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02518191, registered on Aug 5, 2015.

Project description:BackgroundUnderweight, overweight, and obesity are major public health challenges among reproductive-age women of lower- and middle-income countries (including Tanzania). In those settings, obesogenic factors (attributes that promote excessive body weight gain) are increasing in the context of an existing high burden of undernutrition. The present study investigated factors associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity among reproductive age women in Tanzania.MethodsThis study used 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey data (n = 11735). To account for the hierarchical nature of the data (i.e., reproductive age women nested within clusters), multilevel multinomial logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between individual-level (socioeconomic, demographic and behavioural) and community-level factors with underweight, overweight, and obesity.ResultsReproductive age women who were informally employed (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 0.96), those who were currently married (RRR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.82) and those who used contraceptives (RRR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.90) were less likely to be underweight. Reproductive age women who attained secondary or higher education (RRR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.96), those who resided in wealthier households (RRR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.78, 3.03) and those who watched the television (RRR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.50) were more likely to be overweight. The risk of experiencing obesity was higher among reproductive age women who attained secondary or higher education (RRR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.61), those who were formally employed (RRR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.98), those who resided in wealthier households (RRR = 4.77; 95% CI: 3.03, 7.50), those who used alcohol (RRR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.82) and/or watched the television (RRR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.35, 2.13).ConclusionOur study suggests that relevant government jurisdictions need to identify, promote, and implement evidence-based interventions that can simultaneously address underweight and overweight/obesity among reproductive age women in Tanzania.

Project description:BackgroundPersons with low socioeconomic status may be disproportionately at risk for multimorbidity.MethodsAdults aged ≥20 years on 4/1/2015 from 7 counties in Minnesota were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (population-based sample). A composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, the area deprivation index (ADI), was estimated at the census block group level (n = 251). The prevalence of 21 chronic conditions was obtained to calculate the proportion of persons with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions) and severe multimorbidity (≥5 chronic conditions). Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the association of ADI with multimorbidity and severe multimorbidity using odds ratios (OR).ResultsAmong 198,941 persons (46.7% male, 30.6% aged ≥60 years), the age- and sex-standardized (to the United States 2010 census) median prevalence (Q1, Q3) was 23.4% (21.3%, 25.9%) for multimorbidity and 4.8% (4.0%, 5.7%) for severe multimorbidity. Compared with persons in the lowest quintile of ADI, persons in the highest quintile had a 50% increased risk of multimorbidity (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.39-1.62) and a 67% increased risk of severe multimorbidity (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.51-1.86) after adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Associations were stronger after further adjustment for individual level of education; persons in the highest quintile had a 78% increased risk of multimorbidity (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.62-1.96) and a 92% increased risk of severe multimorbidity (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.72-2.13). There was evidence of interactions between ADI and age, between ADI and sex, and between ADI and education. After age 70 years, no difference in the risk of multimorbidity was observed across quintiles of ADI. The pattern of increasing multimorbidity with increasing ADI was more pronounced in women. Finally, there was less variability across quintiles of ADI for the most highly educated group.ConclusionsHigher ADI was associated with increased risk of multimorbidity, and the associations were strengthened after adjustment for individual level of education, suggesting that neighborhood context plays a role in health above and beyond individual measures of socioeconomic status. Furthermore, associations were more pronounced in younger persons and women, highlighting the importance of interventions to prevent chronic conditions in younger women, in particular.

Dataset Information

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with decreased ovarian reserve in women with overweight and obesity.

Objective(s)

Design

Setting

Patient(s)

Intervention(s)

Main outcome measure(s)

Result(s)

Conclusion(s)

Publications

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with decreased ovarian reserve in women with overweight and obesity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets