Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Endoscopic resection using adaptive traction for a large recurrence after a full-thickness transanal endoscopic microsurgery: improving exposure is a key point for complete removal.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Masgnaux LJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10089797 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Endoscopic resection using adaptive traction for a large recurrence after a full-thickness transanal endoscopic microsurgery: improving exposure is a key point for complete removal.

Masgnaux Louis-Jean LJ Grimaldi Jean J Rivory Jérôme J Wallenhorst Timothée T Legros Romain R Jacques Jérémie J Pioche Mathieu M

Endoscopy 20230411 S 01

PMID: 37040884

Similar Datasets

Endoscopic full thickness resection vs. transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors - a retrospective analysis.

Project description:PurposeLocal treatment of small well-differentiated rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is recommended by current guidelines. However, although several endoscopic methods have been established, the highest R0 rate is achieved by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Since a recently published study about endoscopic full thickness resection (eFTR) showed a R0 resection rate of 100%, the aim of this study was to evaluate both methods (eFTR vs. TEM).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients with rectal NET treated either by TEM (1999-2018) or eFTR (2016-2019) in two tertiary centers (University Hospital Wuerzburg and Ulm). We analyzed clinical, procedural, and histopathological outcomes in both groups.ResultsTwenty-eight patients with rectal NET received local treatment (TEM: 13; eFTR: 15). Most tumors were at stage T1a and grade G1 or G2 (in the TEM group two G3 NETs were staged T2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). In both groups, similar outcomes for en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, tumor size, or specimen size were found. No procedural adverse events were noted. Mean procedure time in the TEM group was 48.9 min and 19.2 min in the eFTR group.ConclusioneFTR is a convincing method for local treatment of small rectal NETs combining high safety and efficacy with short interventional time.

| S-EPMC8026435 | biostudies-literature

Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection and overstitch suture after incomplete nonexposed endoscopic full-thickness resection.

Project description:Video 1Endoscopic resection and suture of neoplastic recurrence after the use of endoscopic full-thickness resection devices for invasive rectal adenocarcinoma.

| S-EPMC10251680 | biostudies-literature

Successful endoscopic full-thickness resection of an exophytic subepithelial lesion with double scope traction technique.

Project description:Video 1Video demonstrating the endoscopic full-thickness resection of an exophytic subepithelial lesion with "double scope traction" technique.

| S-EPMC9174079 | biostudies-literature

Does transanal endoscopic microsurgery affect rectal function?

Project description:PurposeTransanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is the most standardized method for the local excision of rectal neoplasms. Unfortunately, local excisions of rectal lesions by means of TEM are not completely free from undesirable functional sequela. This study was performed to evaluate the risk factors of major loss of function after TEM.MethodsEighty-nine patients underwent TEM between 2019 and 2020. Anorectal manometry was performed before the surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. The quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale.ResultsThe major decrease in QoL was observed in women in 3 months after the surgery in terms of lifestyle and frustration domains (3.6 and 3.64 points, respectively). In 3 months after the surgery, there was a significant decrease in resting pressure both in male and female patients (P=0.01). This difference remained significant 6 months after the surgery (P=0.01). In 12 months after the surgery, resting pressure returned to the preoperative level in most patients (P=0.50). A significant decrease in manometric parameters appeared when the surgery time is more than 55 minutes (P=0.05), the tumor localization is lower than 3 cm from the anus (P=0.03), and the tumor size is over 3 cm (P=0.001).ConclusionThe most significant risk factors for the development of functional disorders after TEM are surgery time of >55 minutes, tumor localization at <3 cm from the anal verge, and tumor size of >3 cm.

| S-EPMC10475803 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic full-thickness resection using double endoscope-assisted snare traction for a large exophytic gastric subepithelial lesion.

Project description:Video 1Endoscopic full-thickness resection using double endoscope-assisted snare traction facilitates precise resection of a large exophytic gastric subepithelial lesion.

| S-EPMC10928133 | biostudies-literature

ASGE guideline for endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection.

Project description:With the development of reliable endoscopic closure techniques and tools, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is emerging as a therapeutic option for the treatment of subepithelial tumors and epithelial neoplasia with significant fibrosis. EFTR may be categorized as "exposed" and "nonexposed." In exposed EFTR, the full-thickness resection is undertaken with a tunneled or nontunneled technique, with subsequent closure of the defect. In nonexposed EFTR, a secure serosa-to-serosa apposition is achieved before full-thickness resection of the isolated lesion. This document reviews current techniques and devices used for EFTR and reviews clinical applications and outcomes.

| S-EPMC6669323 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Combined with Laparoscopic Surgery.

Project description:Endoscopic full-thickness resection combined with laparoscopic surgery was recently developed. These procedures could be categorized as "Cut first and then suture" and "Suture first and then cut". "Cut first and then suture" includes laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) and laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (LAEFR). Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of LECS and LAEFR. However, these techniques are limited by the related exposure of the tumor and gastric mucosa to the peritoneal cavity and manipulation of these organs, which could lead to viable cancer cell seeding and the spillage of gastric juice into the peritoneal cavity. In the "Suture first and then cut" technique, the serosal side of the stomach is sutured to invert the stomach and subsequently endoscopic resection is performed. In this article, details of these techniques, including their advantages and limitations, are described.

| S-EPMC5806927 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumor using a dedicated full-thickness resection device.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7570444 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric ulceration with persistent low-grade dysplasia using full-thickness resection device.

Project description:Video 1Endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric ulceration with persistent low-grade dysplasia using full-thickness resection device.

| S-EPMC9669567 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic full-thickness resection with retroperitoneal dissection for duodenal myogenic cyst with adjustable traction from an independently controlled snare.

Project description:Video 1Endoscopic full thickness resection with retroperitoneal dissection for duodenal myogenic cyst with adjustable traction from an independently controlled snare.

| S-EPMC9832242 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data