MRI Compared with Low-Dose CT for Incidental Lung Nodule Detection in COPD: A Multicenter Trial
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To investigate morphofunctional chest MRI for the detection and
SUBMITTER:
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10141334 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the improvement of two denoising models with different learning targets (Dir and Res) of generative adversarial network (GAN) on image quality and lung nodule detectability in chest low-dose CT (LDCT).MethodsIn training phase, by using LDCT images simulated from standard dose CT (SDCT) of 200 participants, Dir model was trained targeting SDCT images, while Res model targeting the residual between SDCT and LDCT images. In testing phase, a phantom and 95 chest LDCT, exclusively with training data, were included for evaluation of imaging quality and pulmonary nodules detectability.ResultsFor phantom images, structural similarity, peak signal-to-noise ratio of both Res and Dir models were higher than that of LDCT. Standard deviation of Res model was the lowest. For patient images, image noise and quality of both two models, were better than that of LDCT. Artifacts of Res model was less than that of LDCT. The diagnostic sensitivity of lung nodule by two readers for LDCT, Res and Dir model, were 72/77%, 79/83% and 72/79% respectively.ConclusionTwo GAN denoising models, including Res and Dir trained with different targets, could effectively reduce image noise of chest LDCT. The image quality evaluation scoring and nodule detectability of Res denoising model was better than that of Dir denoising model and that of hybrid IR images.Advances in knowledgeThe GAN-trained model, which learned the residual between SDCT and LDCT images, reduced image noise and increased the lung nodule detectability by radiologists on chest LDCT. This demonstrates the potential for clinical benefit.
| S-EPMC9815729 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo present and validate a fully automated airway detection method at low-dose CT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, deep learning (DL) and freeze-and-grow (FG) methods were optimized and applied to automatically detect airways at low-dose CT. Four data sets were used: two data sets consisting of matching standard- and low-dose CT scans from the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) phase II (2014-2017) cohort (n = 2 × 236; mean age ± SD, 70 years ± 9; 123 women); one data set consisting of low-dose CT scans from the COPDGene phase III (2018-2020) cohort (n = 335; mean age ± SD, 73 years ± 8; 173 women); and one data set consisting of low-dose, anonymized CT scans from the 2003 Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening trial (n = 55) acquired by using different CT scanners. Performance measures for different methods were computed and compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsAt low-dose CT, 56 294 of 62 480 (90.1%) airways of the reference total airway count (TAC) and 32 109 of 37 864 (84.8%) airways of the peripheral TAC (TACp), detected at standard-dose CT, were detected. Significant losses (P < .001) of 14 526 of 76 453 (19.0%) airways and 884 of 6908 (12.8%) airways in the TAC and 12 256 of 43 462 (28.2%) airways and 699 of 3882 (18.0%) airways in the TACp were observed, respectively, for the multiprotocol and multiscanner data without retraining. When using the automated low-dose CT method, TAC values of 347, 342, 323, and 266 and TACp values of 205, 202, 289, and 141 were observed for those who have never smoked and participants at Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages 0, 1, and 2, respectively, which were superior to the respective values previously reported for matching groups when using a semiautomated method at standard-dose CT.ConclusionA low-cost, automated CT-based airway detection method was suitable for investigation of airway phenotypes at low-dose CT.Keywords: Airway, Airway Count, Airway Detection, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, CT, Deep Learning, Generalizability, Low-Dose CT, Segmentation, Thorax, LungClinical trial registration no. NCT00608764 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.
| S-EPMC9806731 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIncidental respiratory disease-related findings are frequently observed on low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screenings. This study analyzed data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to assess the relationship between such findings and respiratory disease mortality (RDM), excluding lung cancer.Research questionAre incidental respiratory findings on LDCT scanning associated with increased RDM?Study design and methodsSubjects in the NLST LDCT arm received three annual screens. Trial radiologists noted findings related to possible lung cancer, as well as respiratory-related incidental findings. Demographic characteristics, smoking history, and medical history were captured in a baseline questionnaire. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess cumulative RDM. Multivariate proportional hazards models were used to assess risk factors for RDM; in addition to incidental CT scan findings, variables included respiratory disease history (COPD/emphysema, and asthma), smoking history, and demographic factors (age, race, sex, and BMI).ResultsOf 26,722 subjects in the NLST LDCT arm, 25,002 received the baseline screen and a subsequent LDCT screen. Overall, 59% were male, 26.5% were aged ≥ 65 years at baseline, and 10.6% reported a history of COPD/emphysema. Emphysema on LDCT scanning was reported in 30.7% of subjects at baseline and in 44.2% at any screen. Of those with emphysema on baseline LDCT scanning, 18% reported a history of COPD/emphysema. Median mortality follow-up was 10.3 years. There were 3,639 deaths, and 708 were from respiratory diseases. Among subjects with no history of COPD/emphysema, 10-year cumulative RDM ranged from 3.9% for subjects with emphysema and reticular opacities to 1.1% for those with neither condition; the corresponding range among subjects with a COPD/emphysema history was 17.3% (both) to 3.7% (neither). Emphysema on LDCT imaging was associated with a significantly elevated RDM hazard ratio (2.27; 95% CI, 1.92-2.7) in the multivariate model. Reticular opacities (including honeycombing/fibrosis/scar) also had a significantly elevated hazard ratio (1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62).InterpretationIncidental respiratory disease-related findings observed on NLST LDCT screens were frequent and associated with increased mortality from respiratory diseases.
| S-EPMC9005861 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Objectives: This study's objective was to investigate the influence of increased scan speed and pitch on image quality and nodule volumetry in patients who underwent ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (CT). Material and Methods: One hundred and two patients who had lung nodules were included in this study. Standard-speed, standard-pitch (SSSP) ultra-low-dose CT and high-speed, high-pitch (HSHP) ultra-low-dose CT were obtained for all patients. Image noise was measured as the standard deviation of attenuation. One hundred and sixty-three nodules were identified and classified according to location, volume, and nodule type. Volume measurement of detected pulmonary nodules was compared according to nodule location, volume, and nodule type. Motion artifacts at the right middle lobe, the lingular segment, and both lower lobes near the lung bases were evaluated. Subjective image quality analysis was also performed. Results: The HSHP CT scan demonstrated decreased motion artifacts at the left upper lobe lingular segment and left lower lobe compared to the SSSP CT scan (p < 0.001). The image noise was higher and the radiation dose was lower in the HSHP scan (p < 0.001). According to the nodule type, the absolute relative volume difference was significantly higher in ground glass opacity nodules compared with those of part-solid and solid nodules (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study results suggest that HSHP ultra-low-dose chest CT scans provide decreased motion artifacts and lower radiation doses compared to SSSP ultra-low-dose chest CT. However, lung nodule volumetry should be performed with caution for ground glass opacity nodules.
| S-EPMC11356370 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionLung cancer screening in individuals at risk has been recommended by various scientific institutions. One of the main concerns for CT screening is repeated radiation exposure, with the risk of inducing malignancies in healthy individuals. Therefore, lowering the radiation dose is one of the main objectives for radiologists. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that an ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocol, using recently introduced hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V, GE medical Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA), is as performant as a standard 'low dose' (LD) CT to detect non-calcified lung nodules ≥4 mm.Methods and analysisThe total number of patients to include is 150. Those are referred for non-enhanced chest CT for detection or follow-up of lung nodule and will undergo an additional unenhanced ULD CT acquisition, the dose of which is on average 10 times lower than the conventional LD acquisition. Total dose of the entire exam (LD+ULD) is lower than the French diagnostic reference level for a chest CT (6.65 millisievert). ULD CT images will be reconstructed with 50% and 100% ASiR-V and LD CT with 50%. The three sets of images will be read in random order by two pair of radiologists, in a blind test, where patient identification and study outcomes are concealed. Detection rate (sensitivity) is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include concordance of nodule characteristics; interobserver reproducibility; influence of subjects' characteristics, nodule location and nodule size; and concordance of emphysema, coronary calcifications evaluated by visual scoring and bronchial alterations between LD and ULD CT. In case of discordance, a third radiologist will arbitrate.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the relevant ethical committee. Each study participant will sign an informed consent form.Trial registration numberNCT03305978; Pre-results.
| S-EPMC6701577 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) is the most sensitive technique for breast cancer detection. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is emerging as a possible alternative to CE-MRI.PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of a low radiation dose contrast-enhanced mammography (L-CEM) in women with suspicious findings on conventional imaging compared to CE-MRI of the breast.Study typeProspective, single center.PopulationWomen with suspicious findings on mammography, tomosynthesis, or ultrasound, and no contraindications for L-CEM or CE-MRI. Eighty women were included.Field strength/sequence1.5 and 3T CE-MRI, standard protocol for breast, with dedicated coils, according to international guidelines. L-CEM was performed using a dedicated prototype.AssessmentThree, off-site, blinded readers evaluated the images according to the BI-RADS lexicon in a randomized order, each in two separate reading sessions. Histology served as a gold standard.Statistical testLesion detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV) were calculated and compared with multivariate statistics.ResultsIncluded were 80 women (mean age, 54.3 years ±11.2 standard deviation) with 93 lesions (32 benign, 61 malignant). The detection rate was significantly higher with CE-MRI (92.5-94.6%; L-CEM 79.6-91.4%, P = 0.014). Sensitivity (L-CEM 65.6-90.2%; CE-MRI 83.6-93.4%, P = 0.086) and NPV (L-CEM 59.6-71.4%; CE-MRI 63.0-76.5%, P = 0.780) did not differ between the modalities. Specificity (L-CEM 46.9-96.9%; CE-MRI 37.5-53.1%, P = 0.001) and PPV (L-CEM 76.4-97.6%; CE-MRI 73.3-77.3%, P = 0.007) were significantly higher with L-CEM. Variations between readers were significant for sensitivity and NPV. The accuracy of L-CEM was as good as CE-MRI (75.3-76.3% vs. 72.0-75.3%, P = 0.514).Data conclusionL-CEM showed a high sensitivity and accuracy in women with suspicious findings on conventional imaging. Compared to CE-MRI, L-CEM has the potential to increase specificity and PPV. L-CEM might help to reduce false-positive biopsies while obtaining sensitivity comparable to that of CE-MRI LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:589-595.
| S-EPMC7496227 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10784109 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo assess whether low-dose CT for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allows for identification of anemic patients and grading anemia severity.Methods and resultsPatients who underwent a preoperative blood-test and low-dose CT scan, as a part of a cardiac SPECT exam, between 01 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels and hematocrit were derived from clinical records. CT images were visually assessed (qualitative analysis) for the detection of inter-ventricular septum sign (IVSS) and aortic rim sign (ARS) and quantitative analysis were performed. The diagnostic accuracy for detecting anemia was compared using Hb values as the standard of reference. A total of 229 patients were included (110 with anemia; 57 mild; 46 moderate; 7 severe). The AUC of IVSS and ARS were 0.830 and 0.669, respectively (p<0.0001). The quantitative analysis outperformed ARS and IVSS; (AUC of 0.893, p=0.29). The optimal anemia cut-off using Youden index was 4.5 HU.ConclusionQuantitative analysis derived from low-dose CT images, as a part of cardiac SPECT exams, have a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of hematocrit for the detection of anemia and may allow discriminating different anemia severities.
| S-EPMC9834113 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundScreening for lung cancer with low radiation dose computed tomography has a strong evidence base, is being introduced in several European countries and is recommended as a new targeted cancer screening programme. The imperative now is to ensure that implementation follows an evidence-based process that will ensure clinical and cost effectiveness. This European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force was formed to provide an expert consensus for the management of incidental findings which can be adapted and followed during implementation.MethodsA multi-European society collaborative group was convened. 23 topics were identified, primarily from an ERS statement on lung cancer screening, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted according to ERS standards. Initial review of abstracts was completed and full text was provided to members of the group for each topic. Sections were edited and the final document approved by all members and the ERS Science Council.ResultsNine topics considered most important and frequent were reviewed as standalone topics (interstitial lung abnormalities, emphysema, bronchiectasis, consolidation, coronary calcification, aortic valve disease, mediastinal mass, mediastinal lymph nodes and thyroid abnormalities). Other topics considered of lower importance or infrequent were grouped into generic categories, suitable for general statements.ConclusionsThis European collaborative group has produced an incidental findings statement that can be followed during lung cancer screening. It will ensure that an evidence-based approach is used for reporting and managing incidental findings, which will mean that harms are minimised and any programme is as cost-effective as possible.
| S-EPMC10876118 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE: To assess inter- and intrascanner variability in volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom using low-dose CT. METHODS: Five spherical solid artificial nodules [diameters 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12 mm; CT density +100 Hounsfield units (HU)] were randomly placed inside an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom in different combinations. The phantom was examined on two 64-row multidetector CT (64-MDCT) systems (CT-A and CT-B) from different vendors with a low-dose protocol. Each CT examination was performed three times. The CT examinations were evaluated twice by independent blinded observers. Nodule volume was semi-automatically measured by dedicated software. Interscanner variability was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis and expressed as 95% confidence interval (CI) of relative differences. Intrascanner variability was expressed as 95% CI of relative variation from the mean. RESULTS: No significant difference in CT-derived volume was found between CT-A and CT-B, except for the 3-mm nodules (p<0.05). The 95% CI of interscanner variability was within ±41.6%, ±18.2% and ±4.9% for 3, 5 and ≥8 mm nodules, respectively. The 95% CI of intrascanner variability was within ±28.6%, ±13.4% and ±2.6% for 3, 5 and ≥8 mm nodules, respectively. CONCLUSION: Different 64-MDCT scanners in low-dose settings yield good agreement in volumetry of artificial pulmonary nodules between 5 mm and 12 mm in diameter. Inter- and intrascanner variability decreases at a larger nodule size to a maximum of 4.9% for ≥8 mm nodules. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The commonly accepted cut-off of 25% to determine nodule growth has the potential to be reduced for ≥8 mm nodules. This offers the possibility of reducing the interval for repeated CT scans in lung cancer screenings.
| S-EPMC3755394 | biostudies-other