Dataset Information

The nonlinear motion of cells subject to external forces.

ABSTRACT: To develop a minimal model for a cell moving in a crowded environment such as in tissue, we investigate the response of a liquid drop of active matter moving on a flat rigid substrate to forces applied at its boundaries. We consider two different self-propulsion mechanisms, active stresses and treadmilling polymerisation, and we investigate how the active drop motion is altered by these surface forces. We find a highly non-linear response to forces that we characterise using drop velocity, drop shape, and the traction between the drop and the substrate. Each self-propulsion mechanism gives rise to two main modes of motion: a long thin drop with zero traction in the bulk, mostly occurring under strong stretching forces, and a parabolic drop with finite traction in the bulk, mostly occurring under strong squeezing forces. In each case there is a sharp transition between parabolic, and long thin drops as a function of the applied forces and indications of drop break-up where large forces stretch the drop.

SUBMITTER: Ioratim-Uba A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10141577 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The nonlinear motion of cells subject to external forces.

Ioratim-Uba Aondoyima A Loisy Aurore A Henkes Silke S Liverpool Tanniemola B TB

Soft matter 20221207 47

To develop a minimal model for a cell moving in a crowded environment such as in tissue, we investigate the response of a liquid drop of active matter moving on a flat rigid substrate to forces applied at its boundaries. We consider two different self-propulsion mechanisms, active stresses and treadmilling polymerisation, and we investigate how the active drop motion is altered by these surface forces. We find a highly non-linear response to forces that we characterise using drop velocity, drop ...[more]

PMID: 36399136

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExternal defibrillators are used for arrhythmia cardioversion and for defibrillating during cardiac arrest. During defibrillation, short-duration biphasic pulses cause intense motion due to rapid chest-wall muscle contraction. A reduced motion external defibrillator (RMD) was constructed by integrating a commercial defibrillator with a Tetanizing-waveform generator. A long-duration, low-amplitude, tetanizing waveform slowly stimulated the chest musculature before the biphasic pulse, reducing muscle contraction during the shock.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate RMD defibrillation in swine for subject motion during defibrillation pulses and for defibrillation effectiveness. RMD defibrillation can reduce the duration of arrhythmia ablation therapy or simplify cardioversion procedures.MethodsThe tetanizing unit delivered a triangular 1-kHz pulse of 0.25- to 2.0-second duration and 10- to 100-V peak amplitude, subsequently triggering the conventional defibrillator to output standard 1- to 200-J energy biphasic pulses at the next R wave. Forward limb motion was evaluated by measuring peak acceleration and limb work during RMD (tetanizing + biphasic) or biphasic pulse-only waveforms at 10-3-second sampling rate. Seven swine were arrested electrically and subsequently defibrillated. Biphasic pulse-only and RMD defibrillations were repeated 25-35 times per swine, varying tetanizing parameters and biphasic pulse energy. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were established by measuring the minimum energy required to restore sinus rhythm with biphasic pulse-only or RMD defibrillations.ResultsTwo forward-limb acceleration peaks occurred during both the tetanizing waveform and biphasic pulse, indicating rapid and slower nociceptic (pain sensation) nerve fiber activation. Optimal RMD tetanizing parameters (25-35 V, 0.25- to 0.75-second duration), relative to biphasic pulse-only defibrillations, resulted in 74% ± 10% smaller peak accelerations and 85% ± 10% reduced limb work. DFT energies were identical when comparing RMD to biphasic pulse-only defibrillations.ConclusionRelative to conventional defibrillations, RMD defibrillations maintain rhythm restoration efficiency with drastically reduced subject motion.

Project description:Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is known to be prone to artifacts related to motion originating from subject movement, cardiac pulsation, and breathing, but also to mechanical issues such as table vibrations. Given the necessity for rigorous quality control and motion correction, users are often left to use simple heuristics to select correction schemes, which involves simple qualitative viewing of the set of DWI data, or the selection of transformation parameter thresholds for detection of motion outliers. The scientific community offers strong theoretical and experimental work on noise reduction and orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction techniques for HARDI data, where post-acquisition motion correction is widely performed, e.g., using the open-source DTIprep software (1), FSL (the FMRIB Software Library) (2), or TORTOISE (3). Nonetheless, effects and consequences of the selection of motion correction schemes on the final analysis, and the eventual risk of introducing confounding factors when comparing populations, are much less known and far beyond simple intuitive guessing. Hence, standard users lack clear guidelines and recommendations in practical settings. This paper reports a comprehensive evaluation framework to systematically assess the outcome of different motion correction choices commonly used by the scientific community on different DWI-derived measures. We make use of human brain HARDI data from a well-controlled motion experiment to simulate various degrees of motion corruption and noise contamination. Choices for correction include exclusion/scrubbing or registration of motion corrupted directions with different choices of interpolation, as well as the option of interpolation of all directions. The comparative evaluation is based on a study of the impact of motion correction using four metrics that quantify (1) similarity of fiber orientation distribution functions (fODFs), (2) deviation of local fiber orientations, (3) global brain connectivity via graph diffusion distance (GDD), and (4) the reproducibility of prominent and anatomically defined fiber tracts. Effects of various motion correction choices are systematically explored and illustrated, leading to a general conclusion of discouraging users from setting ad hoc thresholds on the estimated motion parameters beyond which volumes are claimed to be corrupted.

Dataset Information

The nonlinear motion of cells subject to external forces.

Publications

The nonlinear motion of cells subject to external forces.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets