Dataset Information

Automatic semantic segmentation of the lumbar spine: Clinical applicability in a multi-parametric and multi-center study on magnetic resonance images.

ABSTRACT: Significant difficulties in medical image segmentation include the high variability of images caused by their origin (multi-center), the acquisition protocols (multi-parametric), the variability of human anatomy, illness severity, the effect of age and gender, and notable other factors. This work addresses problems associated with the automatic semantic segmentation of lumbar spine magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural networks. We aimed to assign a class label to each pixel of an image, with classes defined by radiologists corresponding to structural elements such as vertebrae, intervertebral discs, nerves, blood vessels, and other tissues. The proposed network topologies represent variants of the U-Net architecture, and we used several complementary blocks to define the variants: three types of convolutional blocks, spatial attention models, deep supervision, and multilevel feature extractor. Here, we describe the topologies and analyze the results of the neural network designs that obtained the most accurate segmentation. Several proposed designs outperform the standard U-Net used as a baseline, primarily when used in ensembles, where the outputs of multiple neural networks are combined according to different strategies.

SUBMITTER: Saenz-Gamboa JJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10242366 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Automatic semantic segmentation of the lumbar spine: Clinical applicability in a multi-parametric and multi-center study on magnetic resonance images.

Sáenz-Gamboa Jhon Jairo JJ Domenech Julio J Alonso-Manjarrés Antonio A Gómez Jon A JA de la Iglesia-Vayá Maria M

Artificial intelligence in medicine 20230426

Significant difficulties in medical image segmentation include the high variability of images caused by their origin (multi-center), the acquisition protocols (multi-parametric), the variability of human anatomy, illness severity, the effect of age and gender, and notable other factors. This work addresses problems associated with the automatic semantic segmentation of lumbar spine magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural networks. We aimed to assign a class label to each pixel of an ...[more]

PMID: 37210154

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesIntroducing SPINEPS, a deep learning method for semantic and instance segmentation of 14 spinal structures (ten vertebra substructures, intervertebral discs, spinal cord, spinal canal, and sacrum) in whole-body sagittal T2-weighted turbo spin echo images.Material and methodsThis local ethics committee-approved study utilized a public dataset (train/test 179/39 subjects, 137 female), a German National Cohort (NAKO) subset (train/test 1412/65 subjects, mean age 53, 694 female), and an in-house dataset (test 10 subjects, mean age 70, 5 female). SPINEPS is a semantic segmentation model, followed by a sliding window approach utilizing a second model to create instance masks from the semantic ones. Segmentation evaluation metrics included the Dice score and average symmetrical surface distance (ASSD). Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsOn the public dataset, SPINEPS outperformed a nnUNet baseline on every structure and metric (e.g., an average over vertebra instances: dice 0.933 vs 0.911, p < 0.001, ASSD 0.21 vs 0.435, p < 0.001). SPINEPS trained on automated annotations of the NAKO achieves an average global Dice score of 0.918 on the combined NAKO and in-house test split. Adding the training data from the public dataset outperforms this (average instance-wise Dice score over the vertebra substructures 0.803 vs 0.778, average global Dice score 0.931 vs 0.918).ConclusionSPINEPS offers segmentation of 14 spinal structures in T2w sagittal images. It provides a semantic mask and an instance mask separating the vertebrae and intervertebral discs. This is the first publicly available algorithm to enable this segmentation.Key pointsQuestion No publicly available automatic approach can yield semantic and instance segmentation masks for the whole spine (including posterior elements) in T2-weighted sagittal TSE images. Findings Segmenting semantically first and then instance-wise outperforms a baseline trained directly on instance segmentation. The developed model produces high-resolution MRI segmentations for the whole spine. Clinical relevance This study introduces an automatic approach to whole spine segmentation, including posterior elements, in arbitrary fields of view T2w sagittal MR images, enabling easy biomarker extraction, automatic localization of pathologies and degenerative diseases, and quantifying analyses as downstream research.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Accurate segmentation of MS lesions on MRI is difficult and, if performed manually, time consuming. Automatic segmentations rely strongly on the image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Literature examining segmentation tool performances in real-world multi-site data acquisition settings is scarce. OBJECTIVE:FLAIR2, a combination of T2-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, improves tissue contrast while suppressing CSF. We compared the use of FLAIR and FLAIR2 in LesionTOADS, OASIS and the lesion segmentation toolbox (LST) when applied to non-homogenized, multi-center 2D-imaging data. METHODS:Lesions were segmented on 47 MS patient data sets obtained from 34 sites using LesionTOADS, OASIS and LST, and compared to a semi-automatically generated reference. The performance of FLAIR and FLAIR2 was assessed using the relative lesion volume difference (LVD), Dice coefficient (DSC), sensitivity (SEN) and symmetric surface distance (SSD). Performance improvements related to lesion volumes (LVs) were evaluated for all tools. For comparison, LesionTOADS was also used to segment lesions from 3 T single-center MR data of 40 clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients. RESULTS:Compared to FLAIR, the use of FLAIR2 in LesionTOADS led to improvements of 31.6% (LVD), 14.0% (DSC), 25.1% (SEN), and 47.0% (SSD) in the multi-center study. DSC and SSD significantly improved for larger LVs, while LVD and SEN were enhanced independent of LV. OASIS showed little difference between FLAIR and FLAIR2, likely due to its inherent use of T2w and FLAIR. LST replicated the benefits of FLAIR2 only in part, indicating that further optimization, particularly at low LVs is needed. In the CIS study, LesionTOADS did not benefit from the use of FLAIR2 as the segmentation performance for both FLAIR and FLAIR2 was heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS:In this real-world, multi-center experiment, FLAIR2 outperformed FLAIR in its ability to segment MS lesions with LesionTOADS. The computation of FLAIR2 enhanced lesion detection, at minimally increased computational time or cost, even retrospectively. Further work is needed to determine how LesionTOADS and other tools, such as LST, can optimally benefit from the improved FLAIR2 contrast.

Dataset Information

Automatic semantic segmentation of the lumbar spine: Clinical applicability in a multi-parametric and multi-center study on magnetic resonance images.

Publications

Automatic semantic segmentation of the lumbar spine: Clinical applicability in a multi-parametric and multi-center study on magnetic resonance images.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets