Dataset Information

The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To develop and explore underlying dimensions of the Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) and psychometric features of potential components. Further, to identify associations between the SeRA and disability-management self-efficacy, type of diagnosis, and type of rehabilitation.

Materials and methods

Based on a previously developed model of self-regulation, expert and patient opinions, and cognitive interviews, a list of 22 items on self-regulation (the SeRA) was constructed. The SeRA was included in a cross-sectional survey among a multi-diagnostic group of 563 former rehabilitation patients. Exploratory analyses were conducted.

Results

Respondents had a mean age of 56.5 (SD 12.7) years. The largest diagnostic groups were chronic pain disorder and brain injury. Four components were found within the SeRA, labelled as "insight into own health condition," "insight into own capabilities," "apply self-regulation," and "organization of help." Cronbach's alpha was high (total scale: 0.93, subscales: range 0.85-0.89). Only scores on the first subscale showed a ceiling effect. Subscale three showed the highest correlation with a self-efficacy measure. Small differences in SeRA total scores (range 71.6-78.1) were found between different diagnostic groups.

Conclusion

The SeRA is a new self-regulation measure with four subscales. Further research is needed to establish the validity and reliability of the SeRA. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) was developed to provide a comprehensive measurement of self-regulation among rehabilitation populations.The SeRA could potentially be used to identify persons with self-regulation problems at the start of rehabilitation treatment and measure outcomes of rehabilitation for self-regulation.The SeRA could potentially be used to help analyse outcomes of rehabilitation practice as well as evaluate interventions on self-regulation.

SUBMITTER: Mol TI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10243404 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.

Mol T I TI van Bennekom C A M CAM Scholten E W M EWM Visser-Meily J M A JMA Beckerman H H Passier P E C A PECA Smeets R J E M RJEM Schiphorst Preuper H R HR Post M W M MWM

Disability and rehabilitation 20220607 12

<h4>Purpose</h4>To develop and explore underlying dimensions of the Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) and psychometric features of potential components. Further, to identify associations between the SeRA and disability-management self-efficacy, type of diagnosis, and type of rehabilitation.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Based on a previously developed model of self-regulation, expert and patient opinions, and cognitive interviews, a list of 22 items on self-regulation (the SeRA) was constructed. ...[more]

PMID: 35672153

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective or purposeTo develop and test a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in surgically amenable epiphora.DesignQuestionnaire development and validation study.Participants201 patients with a cause of epiphora amenable to surgical intervention, recruited across three independent centres.Methods, intervention or testingThe watery eye quality of life (WEQOL) questionnaire was developed and refined according to defined psychometric standards. Both surgical and non-surgical participants completed WEQOL at baseline and follow-up (>3 months), along with the Lacrimal Symptom Questionnaire (Lac-Q), RAND Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Convergent validity of WEQOL was evaluated according to correlation (R > 0.40) with each of these additional tests. Responsiveness of WEQOL to intervention was evaluated according to patient-reported success. Test-retest reliability was assessed by the Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation (ICC) in a subset of 64 participants at baseline.Main outcome measuresWEQOL construct validity, responsiveness and test-retest reliability.ResultsWEQOL was moderately correlated (R > 0.4) with the Lac-Q and several subscales of the SF-36 (physical role limitation, social, emotional role limitation and emotional well-being). A stronger correlation was found between the change in WEQOL at follow-up and GBI (R = 0.61). An appropriate graded response was found with a significant change in WEQOL score being observed in patients reporting successful (-28%, p < 0.0001) and partially successful surgery (-6%, p = 0.04), but not in those reporting unsuccessful surgery (+2%, p = 0.9). High test-retest reliability was observed (ICC = 0.93).ConclusionsThe WEQOL questionnaire has been developed systematically according to modern psychometric standards and has been designed to evaluate the quality of life in patients with epiphora that is of a surgically amenable cause. In this study, it has demonstrated appropriate test-retest reliability, responsiveness and construct validity.

Project description:PurposeRecurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) is a highly prevalent condition associated with significant poor quality of life outcomes. A patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of rUTI-associated psychosocial impact is urgently required to supplement clinical evaluation and validate the challenges experienced by patients. This study therefore developed and validated the Recurrent UTI Impact Questionnaire (RUTIIQ).MethodsA rigorous four-stage methodology was followed: (I) concept elicitation through a qualitative survey of the experiences of people with rUTI (N = 1983); (II) Delphi expert screening of the RUTIIQ with expert rUTI clinicians (N = 15); (III) one-to-one cognitive interviews with people experiencing rUTI (N = 28) to evaluate the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the RUTIIQ, and (IV) full pilot testing of the RUTIIQ with people experiencing rUTI (N = 240) to perform final item reduction and psychometric analysis.ResultsExploratory factor analysis demonstrated a five-factor structure comprising: 'patient satisfaction', 'work and activity interference', 'social wellbeing', 'personal wellbeing', and 'sexual wellbeing', collectively accounting for 73.8% of the total variance in pilot scores. Results from expert clinicians and patients indicated strong item content validity (I-CVI > .75). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the RUTIIQ subscales were excellent (Cronbach's α = .81-.96, ICC = .66-.91), and construct validity was strong (Spearman's ρ > .69).ConclusionThe RUTIIQ is a 30-item questionnaire with excellent psychometric properties, assessing the patient-reported psychosocial impact of living with rUTI symptoms and pain. This new instrument delivers the unique opportunity to enhance patient-centred care through standardised observation and monitoring of rUTI patient outcomes.Trial registrationThis study was pre-registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT05086900).

Dataset Information

The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets