Nivolumab after Induction Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Low PD-L1 Expression
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ahn B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10526182 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have been proved one of the most promising treatments against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies can provide added benefits for pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC and which patients are most likely to benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy remain controversial. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety between anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and docetaxel in previously treated, advanced NSCLC. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies. Five studies with a total of 3,025 patients were included. Our results showed that, for all patients, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy prolonged overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94). For patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy had higher objective response rates. In subgroup analysis according to the tumor PD-L1 expression level, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was associated with longer OS and PFS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥1%, ≥5%, ≥10% and ≥50%), but not in those with low expressions. In subgroup analysis of patients' characteristics, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies showed OS benefits across most prespecified subgroups, except for patients with EGFR mutation-positive and never smokers. For patients with EGFR mutation, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was an unfavorable factor of PFS. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events rates of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment were significantly lower than that of docetaxel. Our results suggest that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy significantly improves survival compared with docetaxel in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC, and has a distinct safety profile from chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC5800935 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNivolumab plus ipilimumab (N-I) or pembrolizumab (PEM) is associated with survival improvement as chemotherapy-free, first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and positive programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, no direct comparison data exist between these two regimens to inform clinical decisions. Therefore, we performed indirect comparison for N-I versus PEM using frequentist methods.ResultsThree randomized trials (KEYNOTE-024, KEYNOTE-042, and CheckMate 227) involving 2372 patients were included. For patients with tumor PD-L1 level of ≥1%, pooled meta-analyses showed that both N-I and PEM improved overall survival (OS) relative to chemotherapy (N-I: hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97; PEM: HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.93); whereas only N-I significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (N-I: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; PEM: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.94-1.21). Neither N-I nor PEM was associated with improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with chemotherapy (N-I: relative risk [RR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.98-1.46; PEM: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.23). Indirect comparisons showed that N-I was associated with longer PFS than PEM (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95). However, N-I was not superior to PEM in terms of OS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.24) and ORR (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89-1.52). N-I showed a less favorable toxicity profile relative to PEM (all grade adverse events: RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17-1.40).ConclusionsN-I and PEM provide comparable OS benefit for PD-L1-positive NSCLC. N-I further improves PFS relative to PEM but at meaningful cost of toxicities.
| S-EPMC7240850 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor tissue is a validated predictive biomarker for a PD-1 pathway blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), longitudinal changes in its expression during treatment remains elusive. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are assumed to reflect the transition of characteristics of the primary tumor undergoing anticancer treatment. Here, we sequentially evaluated the PD-L1 expression on CTCs in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. Forty-five patients were enrolled, and CTCs were enriched from 3 mL of peripheral blood using a microcavity array system at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24 or until progressive disease. The effective responses to therapy were compared between patients without progressive disease (PD) at week 8 (i.e., non-PD patients) and in those with PD between weeks 4 and 8 (PD patients) in terms of increased vs. decreased or equal CTC status at week 8 (for non-PD patients) or at the point of PD (for PD patients) compared to the baseline. Significantly more non-PD patients were classified as decreased or equal in number and proportion to PD-L1-positive CTCs among the detected CTCs (PD-L1 positivity rates) (p < 0.05). Moreover, progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients with ≥7.7% PD-L1 positivity rates (n = 8) than in those with <7.7% rates (n = 8; p < 0.01) at week 8. These results suggest the predictive significance of the early evaluation of PD-L1 expression on CTCs for maintaining the benefits from nivolumab treatment.
| S-EPMC8150706 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer refractory to the previous regimen of chemotherapy suffered from poor prognosis without many effective treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide promising efficacy, but the relevant clinical trials have offered controversial data. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of inhibitors against programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 versus chemotherapy as second or third-line therapy in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 2,648 patients were included. The meta-analysis results indicated that both ORR (RR = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.85∼2.25, P = 0.188) and PFS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.88∼1.46, P = 0.316) were not significantly improved by ICIs compared with chemotherapy. However, the OS was significantly prolonged (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97, P = 0.018) in the ICIs group compared with chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis showed that ICIs provide statistically significant OS benefits over chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive, squamous cell carcinoma, Asia origin, esophageal cancer, second-line treatment, male, and aged 65 or older patients. Compared with chemotherapy, the TRAEs risk of ICIs was reduced by 33% (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.62-0.73, P ≤ 0.001). And the risk of grades 3-5 of TRAEs was reduced by 60% (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.33-0.49, P ≤ 0.001). Compared to chemotherapy, ICIs appeared to improve OS and were better tolerated in previously treated patients with advanced esophageal cancer. We recommend PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as an optimal treatment option for positive PD-L1 expression, squamous cell carcinoma, Asia origin, esophageal cancer, second-line treatment, male, and ≥65 years of age patients.
| S-EPMC8463210 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Based on the results of the CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057 studies, nivolumab therapy has become a new standard treatment for both squamous and non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, due to the specific inclusion criteria of these clinical trials, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in real-world practice were not certain. In general, the real-world results of nivolumab treatment have been consistent with those obtained in clinical trials. Additional analyses of the real-world data have made the identification of prognostic factors possible. Good performance status is the most significant predictor of clinical benefit. Brain metastases, liver metastases, EGFR mutation, malignant pleural effusion, and a high number of metastatic sites were identified as negative prognostic factors. By contrast, a longer time to disease progression (>6 months) from the beginning of prior chemotherapy and an objective response to chemotherapy seem to have positive prognostic value in the case of nivolumab treatment. In terms of patient age, the data are inconclusive. Some blood biomarkers can also be considered significant prognostic factors.
| S-EPMC7408765 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceHyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a new pattern of progression recently described in patients with cancer treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. The rate and outcome of HPD in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are unknown.ObjectivesTo investigate whether HPD is observed in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with single-agent chemotherapy and whether there is an association between treatment and HPD.Design, setting, and participantsIn this multicenter retrospective study that included patients treated between August 4, 2011, and April 5, 2017, the setting was pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (8 institutions) or single-agent chemotherapy (4 institutions) in France. Measurable disease defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) on at least 2 computed tomographic scans before treatment and 1 computed tomographic scan during treatment was required.InterventionsThe tumor growth rate (TGR) before and during treatment and variation per month (ΔTGR) were calculated. Hyperprogressive disease was defined as disease progression at the first evaluation with ΔTGR exceeding 50%.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was assessment of the HPD rate in patients treated with IO or chemotherapy.ResultsAmong 406 eligible patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (63.8% male), 46.3% (n = 188) were 65 years or older, 72.4% (n = 294) had nonsquamous histology, and 92.9% (n = 377) received a PD-1 inhibitor as monotherapy in second-line therapy or later. The median follow-up was 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.1-13.8 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 10.2-17.0 months). Fifty-six patients (13.8%) were classified as having HPD. Pseudoprogression was observed in 4.7% (n = 19) of the population. Hyperprogressive disease was significantly associated with more than 2 metastatic sites before PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with non-HPD (62.5% [35 of 56] vs 42.6% [149 of 350]; P = .006). Patients experiencing HPD within the first 6 weeks of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment had significantly lower OS compared with patients with progressive disease (median OS, 3.4 months [95% CI, 2.8-7.5 months] vs 6.2 months [95% CI, 5.3-7.9 months]; hazard ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.29-3.69]; P = .003). Among 59 eligible patients treated with chemotherapy, 3 (5.1%) were classified as having HPD.Conclusions and relevanceOur study suggests that HPD is more common with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with chemotherapy in pretreated patients with NSCLC and is also associated with high metastatic burden and poor prognosis in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Additional studies are needed to determine the molecular mechanisms involved in HPD.
| S-EPMC6248085 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceEvidence regarding real-world effectiveness of therapies for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy is lacking.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of the immune checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab (programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor) and nivolumab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) and the chemotherapy drug docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy.Design, setting, and participantsThis comparative effectiveness study compared patients aged 18 years or older with advanced NSCLC who initiated atezolizumab, docetaxel, or nivolumab and who had previously been exposed to platinum-based chemotherapy using nationally representative real-world data from more than 280 US cancer clinics. Patients were followed-up from May 2011 to March 2020. Data analysis was performed between April and June 2021. Comparisons of interest were between atezolizumab vs docetaxel and atezolizumab vs nivolumab.ExposuresInitiation of atezolizumab, nivolumab, or docetaxel monotherapy.Main outcome and measuresThe main outcome was overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 3336 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [9.49] years; 1820 [54.6%] men and 1516 [45.4%] women) were assessed in the main analysis, including 206 patients receiving atezolizumab, 500 receiving docetaxel, and 2630 receiving nivolumab. Patients receiving atezolizumab were older than those treated with docetaxel (mean age [SD], 68.3 [9.4] years vs 65.6 [9.5] years), and were more likely to have been treated in an academic setting (39 patients [18.9%]) than those receiving docetaxel (49 patients [9.8%]) and nivolumab (128 patients [4.9%]). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, atezolizumab was associated with a significantly longer OS compared with docetaxel (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97). No significant difference in OS was observed between atezolizumab and nivolumab (aHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89-1.28). These findings were consistent across all patient subgroups tested, and robust to plausible deviations from random missingness for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in real-world data (eg, the tipping point for loss of a significantly beneficial effect for atezolizumab vs docetaxel was achieved if patients in the docetaxel group missing baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had a mean performance status of 1.43 higher than expected).Conclusions and relevanceIn this comparative effectiveness study, atezolizumab was superior to docetaxel and matched nivolumab in prolonging OS in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC8590169 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) may enhance antitumor effects. We conducted an open-label randomized phase II/III study to evaluate nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy in comparison with nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated ICI-naïve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThe primary endpoint of the phase III study was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. As ICI and platinum-doublet combination chemotherapy was approved in the first-line setting during this study, patient accrual was discontinued.ResultsOne hundred twenty-eight patients (each arm, n = 64) were included in the full analysis set. The median OS in nivolumab (arm A) and nivolumab + docetaxel (arm B) was 14.7 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.7) and 23.1 months (95% CI, 16.7-NR), respectively. The HR for OS was 0.63 (90% CI, 0.42-0.95; P = 0.0310). The median PFS in arms A and arm B was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.0-3.9) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 3.8-9.4), respectively. The HR for progression was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.39-0.88; P = 0.0095). The ORR was 14.0% (95% CI, 6.3-25.8) in arm A and 41.8% (95% CI, 28.7-55.9) in arm B. Hematotoxicity and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in arm B than in arm A. Two treatment-related deaths were observed, including one patient in arm A who died of pneumonitis and one in arm B who died of myocarditis.ConclusionsDespite a slightly elevated toxicity, the addition of docetaxel to nivolumab has significantly prolonged the OS and PFS of patients with previously treated ICI-naïve NSCLC.
| S-EPMC9561604 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study was conducted to investigate whether polymorphisms of genes involved in immune checkpoints can predict the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1st line paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy. A total of 379 NSCLC patients were enrolled. Twelve single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 genes were selected and genotyped. The associations of SNPs with chemotherapy response and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Among the 12 SNPs investigated, PD-L1 rs2297136T > C and rs4143815C > G were significantly associated with clinical outcomes after chemotherapy. The rs2297136T > C was significantly associated with both better chemotherapy response and better OS, and the rs4143815C > G had a significantly better response to chemotherapy. Consistent with the individual genotype analyses, rs2297136C-rs4143815G haplotype (ht4) carrying variant alleles at both loci was significantly associated with better chemotherapy response and OS compared with combined other haplotypes. Patients with at least one ht4 had significantly better chemotherapy response and OS compared to those without ht4. PD-L1 rs2297136T > C and rs4143815C > G polymorphisms may be useful for the prediction of clinical outcome of 1(st) line paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy in NSCLC. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to understand the role of PD-L1 in the chemotherapy outcome of NSCLC patients.
| S-EPMC4867646 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Although the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have markedly changed the strategies of cancer treatment, most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not respond to PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Epigenetic drugs have been hypothesized to possess the potential to sensitize PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Case Presentation: Three patients with advanced metastatic NSCLC failed to respond to first-line systemic therapy and had a low tumor mutation burden, low tumor neoantigen burden, low microsatellite instability, and HLA loss of heterozygosity according to their target lesion biopsies, all of which were considered unfavorable factors for PD-1/PD-L1 blockage. However, all three patients responded to low-dose decitabine, an epigenetic drug, in combination with camrelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), with only controllable adverse events, indicating that low-dose decitabine can sensitize PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Summary: We report a novel therapy with low-dose decitabine plus camrelizumab for advanced NSCLC on the basis of successful treatment of three patients, emphasizing the potential of epigenetic drugs to regulate PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC.
| S-EPMC7649792 | biostudies-literature