Dataset Information

Association between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomic Features, Genomic Alterations and Prognosis in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

ABSTRACT: Non-invasive methods to assess mutational status, as well as novel prognostic biomarkers, are warranted to foster therapy personalization of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the association of contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) radiomic features of lung adenocarcinoma lesions, alone or integrated with clinical parameters, with tumor mutational status (EGFR, KRAS, ALK alterations) and Overall Survival (OS). In total, 261 retrospective and 48 prospective patients were enrolled. A Radiomic Score (RS) was created with LASSO-Logistic regression models to predict mutational status. Radiomic, clinical and clinical-radiomic models were trained on retrospective data and tested (Area Under the Curve, AUC) on prospective data. OS prediction models were trained and tested on retrospective data with internal cross-validation (C-index). RS significantly predicted each alteration at training (radiomic and clinical-radiomic AUC 0.95-0.98); validation performance was good for EGFR (AUC 0.86), moderate for KRAS and ALK (AUC 0.61-0.65). RS was also associated with OS at univariate and multivariable analysis, in the latter with stage and type of treatment. The validation C-index was 0.63, 0.79, and 0.80 for clinical, radiomic, and clinical-radiomic models. The study supports the potential role of CT radiomics for non-invasive identification of gene alterations and prognosis prediction in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, to be confirmed with independent studies.

SUBMITTER: Rinaldi L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10527057 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomic Features, Genomic Alterations and Prognosis in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

Rinaldi Lisa L Guerini Rocco Elena E Spitaleri Gianluca G Raimondi Sara S Attili Ilaria I Ranghiero Alberto A Cammarata Giulio G Minotti Marta M Lo Presti Giuliana G De Piano Francesca F Bellerba Federica F Funicelli Gianluigi G Volpe Stefania S Mora Serena S Fodor Cristiana C Rampinelli Cristiano C Barberis Massimo M De Marinis Filippo F Jereczek-Fossa Barbara Alicja BA Orecchia Roberto R Rizzo Stefania S Botta Francesca F

Cancers 20230914 18

Non-invasive methods to assess mutational status, as well as novel prognostic biomarkers, are warranted to foster therapy personalization of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the association of contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) radiomic features of lung adenocarcinoma lesions, alone or integrated with clinical parameters, with tumor mutational status (EGFR, KRAS, ALK alterations) and Overall Survival (OS). In total, 2 ...[more]

PMID: 37760521

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo assess the reproducibility of radiomic features (RFs) extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) scans of patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with regards to inter-observer variability and acquisition timing after contrast injection. The predictive ability of reproducible RFs for differentiating between the degrees of HCC differentiation is also investigated.MethodsWe analyzed a set of DCE-CT scans of 39 patients diagnosed with HCC. Two radiologists independently segmented the scans, and RFs were extracted from each sequence of the DCE-CT scans. The same lesion was segmented across the DCE-CT sequences of each patient's scan. From each lesion, 127 commonly used RFs were extracted. The reproducibility of RFs was assessed with regard to (i) inter-observer variability, by evaluating the reproducibility of RFs between the two radiologists; and (ii) timing of acquisition following contrast injection (inter- and intra-imaging phase). The reproducibility of RFs was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), with a cut-off value of 0.90. Reproducible RFs were used for building XGBoost classification models for the differentiation of HCC differentiation.ResultsInter-observer analyses across the different contrast-enhancement phases showed that the number of reproducible RFs was 29 (22.8%), 52 (40.9%), and 36 (28.3%) for the non-contrast enhanced, late arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Intra- and inter-sequence analyses revealed that the number of reproducible RFs ranged between 1 (0.8%) and 47 (37%), inversely related with time interval between the sequences. XGBoost algorithms built using reproducible RFs in each phase were found to be high predictive ability of the degree of HCC tumor differentiation.ConclusionsThe reproducibility of many RFs was significantly impacted by inter-observer variability, and a larger number of RFs were impacted by the difference in the time of acquisition after contrast injection. Our findings highlight the need for quality assessment to ensure that scans are analyzed in the same physiologic imaging phase in quantitative imaging studies, or that phase-wide reproducible RFs are selected. Overall, the study emphasizes the importance of reproducibility and quality control when using RFs as biomarkers for clinical applications.

Project description:ObjectiveTo identify stable and discriminating radiomic features on non-contrast CT scans to develop more generalisable radiomic classifiers for distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas.MethodsIn total, 412 patients with adenocarcinomas and granulomas from three institutions were retrospectively included. Segmentations of the lung nodules were performed manually by an expert radiologist in a 2D axial view. Radiomic features were extracted from intra- and perinodular regions. A total of 145 patients were used as part of the training set (Str), whereas 205 patients were used as part of test set I (Ste1) and 62 patients were used as part of independent test set II (Ste2). To mitigate the variation of CT acquisition parameters, we defined 'stable' radiomic features as those for which the feature expression remains relatively unchanged between different sites, as assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. These stable features were used to develop more generalisable radiomic classifiers that were more resilient to variations in lung CT scans. Features were ranked based on two criteria, firstly based on discriminability (i.e. maximising AUC) alone and subsequently based on maximising both feature stability and discriminability. Different machine-learning classifiers (Linear discriminant analysis, Quadratic discriminant analysis, Support vector machines and random forest) were trained with features selected using the two different criteria and then compared on the two independent test sets for distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas, in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsIn the test sets, classifiers constructed using the criteria involving maximising feature stability and discriminability simultaneously achieved higher AUC compared with the discriminating alone criteria (Ste1 [n = 205]: maximum AUCs of 0.85versus . 0.80; p-value = 0.047 and Ste2 [n = 62]: maximum AUCs of 0.87 versus. 0.79; p-value = 0.021). These differences held for features extracted from scans with <3 mm slice thickness (AUC = 0.88 versus. 0.80; p-value = 0.039, n = 100) and for the ≥3 mm cases (AUC = 0.81 versus. 0.76; p-value = 0.034, n = 105). In both experiments, shape and peritumoural texture features had a higher stability compared with intratumoural texture features.ConclusionsOur study suggests that explicitly accounting for both stability and discriminability results in more generalisable radiomic classifiers to distinguish adenocarcinomas from granulomas on non-contrast CT scans. Our results also showed that peritumoural texture and shape features were less affected by the scanner parameters compared with intratumoural texture features; however, they were also less discriminating compared with intratumoural features.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presented similar clinical symptoms, but required different treatment approaches and had different survival outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in differentiating MFP from PDAC.MethodsA literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu (VIP), and WanFang databases to identify original studies published from inception to August 20, 2021. Studies reporting the diagnostic performances of CEUS and CECT for differentiating MFP from PDAC were included. The meta-analysis was performed with Stata 15.0 software. The outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves of CEUS and CECT. Meta-regression was conducted to investigate heterogeneity. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to indirectly compare the overall diagnostic performance.ResultsTwenty-six studies with 2115 pancreatic masses were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for MFP were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%; I2 = 0.00%) and 95% (95% CI, 90%-97%; I2 = 63.44%), respectively; the overall +LR, -LR, and DOR values were 15.12 (95% CI, 7.61-30.01), 0.19 (95% CI, 0.13-0.29), and 78.91 (95% CI, 30.94-201.27), respectively; and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-92). However, the overall sensitivity and specificity of CECT were 81% (95% CI, 75-85%; I2 = 66.37%) and 94% (95% CI, 90-96%; I2 = 74.87%); the overall +LR, -LR, and DOR values were 12.91 (95% CI, 7.86-21.20), 0.21 (95% CI, 0.16-0.27), and 62.53 (95% CI, 34.45-113.51), respectively; and, the SROC AUC was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94). The overall diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was comparable to that of CECT for the differential diagnosis of MFP and PDAC (relative DOR 1.26, 95% CI [0.42-3.83], P > 0.05).ConclusionsCEUS and CECT have comparable diagnostic performance for differentiating MFP from PDAC, and should be considered as mutually complementary diagnostic tools for suspected focal pancreatic lesions.

Dataset Information

Association between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomic Features, Genomic Alterations and Prognosis in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

Publications

Association between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomic Features, Genomic Alterations and Prognosis in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets