Dataset Information

Quantitative Evaluation of CFTR Gene Expression: A Comparison between Relative Quantification by Real-Time PCR and Absolute Quantification by Droplet Digital PCR.

ABSTRACT: In the precision medicine era of cystic fibrosis (CF), therapeutic interventions, by the so-called modulators, target the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The levels of targetable CFTR proteins are a main variable in the success of patient-specific therapy. In turn, the CFTR protein level depends, at least in part, on the level of CFTR mRNA. Many mechanisms can modulate the CFTR mRNA level, for example, transcriptional rate, stability of the mRNA, epigenetics, and pathogenic variants that can affect mRNA production and degradation. Independently from the causes of variable CFTR mRNA levels, their exact quantitative assessment is of great importance in CF. Methods with high analytical sensitivity, precision, and accuracy are mandatory for the quantitative evaluation aimed at the amelioration of the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic aspects. This paper compares, for the first time, two CFTR gene expression quantification methods: a well-established method for the relative quantification of CFTR mRNA using a real-time PCR and an innovative method for its absolute quantification using a droplet digital PCR. No comprehensive methods for absolute CFTR quantification via droplet digital PCR have been published so far. The accurate quantification of CFTR expression at the mRNA level is a critical step for the personalized therapeutic approaches of CF.

SUBMITTER: Bruno SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10531455 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantitative Evaluation of CFTR Gene Expression: A Comparison between Relative Quantification by Real-Time PCR and Absolute Quantification by Droplet Digital PCR.

Bruno Sabina Maria SM Blaconà Giovanna G Lo Cicero Stefania S Castelli Germana G Virgulti Mariarita M Testino Giancarlo G Pierandrei Silvia S Fuso Andrea A Cimino Giuseppe G Ferraguti Giampiero G Eramo Adriana A Lucarelli Marco M

Genes 20230909 9

In the precision medicine era of cystic fibrosis (CF), therapeutic interventions, by the so-called modulators, target the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The levels of targetable CFTR proteins are a main variable in the success of patient-specific therapy. In turn, the CFTR protein level depends, at least in part, on the level of CFTR mRNA. Many mechanisms can modulate the CFTR mRNA level, for example, transcriptional rate, stability of the mRNA, ...[more]

PMID: 37761921

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cell-associated (CA) HIV-1 RNA is considered a potential marker for assessment of viral reservoir dynamics and antiretroviral therapy (ART) response in HIV-infected patients. Recent studies employed sensitive seminested real-time quantitative (q)PCR to quantify CA HIV-1 RNA. Digital PCR has been recently described as an alternative PCR-based technique for absolute quantification with higher accuracy compared to qPCR. Here, a comparison was made between the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and the seminested qPCR for quantification of unspliced (us) and multiply spliced (ms) CA HIV-1 RNA. Synthetic RNA standards and CA HIV-1 RNA from infected patients on and off ART (N = 34) were quantified with both methods. Correlations were observed between the methods both for serially diluted synthetic standards (usRNA: R2 = 0.97, msRNA: R2 = 0.92) and patient-derived samples (usRNA: R2 = 0.51, msRNA: R2 = 0.87). Seminested qPCR showed better quantitative linearity, accuracy and sensitivity in the quantification of synthetic standards than ddPCR, especially in the lower quantification ranges. Both methods demonstrated equally high detection rate of usRNA in patient samples on and off ART (91%), whereas ddPCR detected msRNA in larger proportion of samples from ART-treated patients (p = 0.13). We observed an average agreement between the methods for usRNA quantification in patient samples, albeit with a large standard deviation (bias = 0.05±0.75 log10). However, a bias of 0.94±0.36 log10 was observed for msRNA. No-template controls were consistently negative in the seminested qPCR, but yielded a positive ddPCR signal for some wells. Therefore, the false positive signals may have affected the detection power of ddPCR in this study. Digital PCR is promising for HIV nucleic acid quantification, but the false positive signals need further attention. Quantitative assays for CA HIV RNA have the potential to improve monitoring of patients on ART and to be used in clinical studies aimed at HIV eradication, but should be cross-validated by multiple laboratories prior to wider use.

Dataset Information

Quantitative Evaluation of CFTR Gene Expression: A Comparison between Relative Quantification by Real-Time PCR and Absolute Quantification by Droplet Digital PCR.

Publications

Quantitative Evaluation of <i>CFTR</i> Gene Expression: A Comparison between Relative Quantification by Real-Time PCR and Absolute Quantification by Droplet Digital PCR.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets