Project description:The gut microbiota is associated with GC; however, the causal association between the gut microbiota and GC remains to be determined. The aim of the present study was to investigate the causal association between gut microbiota and gastric cancer (GC) from the perspective of Mendelian randomization (MR). The present study performed MR analysis using summary statistics from a genome-wide association study of the gut microbiome and GC. Inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median methods were used to investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and GC. Heterogeneity tests were performed using Cochrane's Q statistic. Horizontal polytropy was detected using Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier were eliminated. Estimates from MR indicated that nine gut microorganism remained stable with regard to acceptance of heterogeneity and sensitivity methods. Among them, the genera Prevotella 7, Roseburia and Ruminococcaceae UCG014 were associated with an increased risk of GC; by contrast, the family Enterobacteriaceae, the genera Allisonella, Lachnospiraceae FCS020, Ruminococcaceae UCG004 and Ruminococcaceae UCG009, and the order Enterobacteriales decreased the risk of GC development. The present study demonstrated the potential importance of modulating the abundance of gut microbiota for the prevention and treatment of GC.
Project description:BackgroundGrowing evidence has shown that gut microbiome composition is associated with Biliary tract cancer (BTC), but the causality remains unknown. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between gut microbiota and BTC, conduct an appraisal of the gut microbiome's utility in facilitating the early diagnosis of BTC.MethodsWe acquired the summary data for Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) pertaining to BTC (418 cases and 159,201 controls) from the Biobank Japan (BBJ) database. Additionally, the GWAS summary data relevant to gut microbiota (N = 18,340) were sourced from the MiBioGen consortium. The primary methodology employed for the analysis consisted of Inverse Variance Weighting (IVW). Evaluations for sensitivity were carried out through the utilization of multiple statistical techniques, encompassing Cochrane's Q test, the MR-Egger intercept evaluation, the global test of MR-PRESSO, and a leave-one-out methodological analysis. Ultimately, a reverse Mendelian Randomization analysis was conducted to assess the potential for reciprocal causality.ResultsThe outcomes derived from IVW substantiated that the presence of Family Streptococcaceae (OR = 0.44, P = 0.034), Family Veillonellaceae (OR = 0.46, P = 0.018), and Genus Dorea (OR = 0.29, P = 0.041) exerted a protective influence against BTC. Conversely, Class Lentisphaeria (OR = 2.21, P = 0.017), Genus Lachnospiraceae FCS020 Group (OR = 2.30, P = 0.013), and Order Victivallales (OR = 2.21, P = 0.017) were associated with an adverse impact. To assess any reverse causal effect, we used BTC as the exposure and the gut microbiota as the outcome, and this analysis revealed associations between BTC and five different types of gut microbiota. The sensitivity analysis disclosed an absence of empirical indicators for either heterogeneity or pleiotropy.ConclusionThis investigation represents the inaugural identification of indicative data supporting either beneficial or detrimental causal relationships between gut microbiota and the risk of BTC, as determined through the utilization of MR methodologies. These outcomes could hold significance for the formulation of individualized therapeutic strategies aimed at BTC prevention and survival enhancement.
Project description:ObjectiveEmerging evidence has provided compelling evidence linking gut microbiota (GM) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) via the "gut-kidney" axis. But the causal relationship between them hasn't been clarified yet. We perform a Two-Sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to reveal the causal connection with GM and the development of DN, type 1 diabetes nephropathy (T1DN), type 2 diabetes nephropathy (T2DN), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsWe used summary data from MiBioGen on 211 GM taxa in 18340 participants. Generalized MR analysis methods were conducted to estimate their causality on risk of DN, T1DN, T2DN, T1DM and T2DM from FinnGen. To ensure the reliability of the findings, a comprehensive set of sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the resilience and consistency of the results.ResultsIt was showed that Class Verrucomicrobiae [odds ratio (OR) =1.5651, 95%CI:1.1810-2.0742,PFDR=0.0018], Order Verrucomicrobiales (OR=1.5651, 95%CI: 1.1810-2.0742, PFDR=0.0018) and Family Verrucomicrobiaceae (OR=1.3956, 95%CI:1.0336-1.8844, PFDR=0.0296) had significant risk of DN. Our analysis found significant associations between GM and T2DN, including Class Verrucomimicrobiae (OR=1.8227, 95% CI: 1.2414-2.6763, PFDR=0.0139), Order Verrucomimicrobiae (OR=1.5651, 95% CI: 1.8227-2.6764, PFDR=0.0024), Rhodospirillales (OR=1.8226, 95% CI: 1.2412-2.6763, PFDR=0.0026), and Family Verrucomicroniaceae (OR=1.8226, 95% CI: 1.2412-2.6763, PFDR=0.0083). The Eubacteriumprotogenes (OR=0.4076, 95% CI: 0.2415-0.6882, PFDR=0.0021) exhibited a protection against T1DN. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that there was no significant heterogeneity and pleiotropy.ConclusionsAt the gene prediction level, we identified the specific GM that is causally linked to DN in both T1DM and T2DM patients. Moreover, we identified distinct microbial changes in T1DN that differed from those seen in T2DN, offering valuable insights into GM signatures associated with subtype of nephropathy.
Project description:BackgroundThe association between gut microbiota and leukemia has been established, but the causal relationship between the two remains unclear.MethodsA bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to analyze the causal relationship between gut microbiota and leukemia. Microbiome data (n = 14,306) and leukemia (n = 1,145) data were both sourced from European populations. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables based on several criteria. We employed various MR methods, such as the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, to evaluate the causal effect between exposure and outcomes and conducted sensitivity analyses to validate the heterogeneity and pleiotropy of the instrumental variables.Results5,742 qualified instrumental variables were included. In the primary MR results, a total of 10 gut microbial taxa were associated with leukemia risk. Genus Blautia and genus Lactococcus are risk factors for acute lymphoblastic leukemia [genus Blautia odds ratio (OR): 1.643, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.592 ~ 1.695, Adjusted p < 0.001; genus Lactococcus OR: 2.152, 95% CI: 1.447 ~ 3.199, Adjusted p = 0.011]. Genus Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, genus Anaerostipes, genus Slackia, and genus Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group are risk factors for acute myeloid leukemia [genus Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group OR: 1.964, 95% CI: 1.573 ~ 2.453, Adjusted p < 0.001; genus Anaerostipes OR: 2.515, 95% CI: 1.503 ~ 4.209, Adjusted p = 0.017; genus Slackia OR: 2.553, 95% CI: 1.481 ~ 4.401, Adjusted p = 0.022; genus Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group OR: 3.417, 95% CI: 1.960 ~ 5.959, Adjusted p = 0.001]. Genus Ruminococcaceae UCG011 and genus Ruminococcaceae UCG014 were risk factors for chronic myeloid leukemia (genus Ruminococcaceae UCG011 OR: 2.010, 95% CI: 1.363 ~ 2.963, Adjusted p = 0.044; genus Ruminococcaceae UCG014 OR: 3.101, 95% CI: 1.626 ~ 5.915, Adjusted p = 0.044). Genus Slackia was a protective factor for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (genus Slackia OR: 0.166, 95% CI: 0.062 ~ 0.443, Adjusted p = 0.017). Family Acidaminococcaceae was a protective factor for acute myeloid leukemia (family Acidaminococcaceae OR: 0.208, 95% CI: 0.120 ~ 0.361, Adjusted p < 0.001). Genus Desulfovibrio was a protective factor for chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (genus Desulfovibrio OR: 0.581, 95% CI: 0.440 ~ 0.768, Adjusted p = 0.020). Sensitivity analysis revealed no heterogeneity or pleiotropy between SNPs.ConclusionThis study revealed the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and leukemia, and identified potential pathogenic bacteria and probiotic taxa associated with the onset of leukemia. This research may aid in the early detection of various types of leukemia and offer a new direction for the prevention and treatment of leukemia.
Project description:BackgroundThe interplay between gut microbiome genera and inflammatory kidney-related diseases, such as nephrotic syndrome, glomerulonephritis, tubulo-interstitial nephritis, and chronic kidney disease, has been observed. However, the causal relationships between specific bacterial genera and these renal diseases have not been fully elucidated.ObjectiveTo investigate the potential causal links between different genera of the gut microbiome and the susceptibility to various renal conditions utilizing two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.Materials and methodsGenome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of gut microbiota and inflammatory kidney-related diseases were obtained from published GWASs. Two-sample MR analyses were conducted using methods including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, and others to identify potential causal links between gut microbial genera and renal conditions. Sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's Q test and the MR-PRESSO global test, were performed to validate the robustness of the results and detect horizontal pleiotropy. In addition, a reverse MR analysis was conducted to assess reverse causation possibilities.ResultsBy synthesizing insights from both primary and sensitivity analyses, this study unveiled critical associations of 12 bacterial genera with nephrotic syndrome, 7 bacterial genera with membranous nephropathy, 3 bacterial genera with glomerulonephritis, 4 bacterial genera with acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis, 6 bacterial genera with chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis, and 7 bacterial genera with chronic kidney disease. Various genera were pinpointed as having either positive or negative causal relationships with these renal conditions, as evidenced by specific ranges of IVW-OR values (all P< 0.05). The congruence of the sensitivity analyses bolstered the primary findings, displaying no marked heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Notably, the reverse MR analysis with nephritis as the exposure did not reveal any causal relationships, thereby strengthening the resilience and validity of the primary associations.ConclusionThis study explored the causal associations between several gut microbial genera and the risk of several inflammatory kidney-related diseases, uncovering several associations between specific gut microbial genera and nephrotic syndrome, membranous nephropathy, glomerulonephritis, tubulo-interstitial nephritis, and chronic kidney disease. These findings enhance our understanding of the complex interplay between the gut microbiome and kidney diseases, and they will be beneficial for early diagnosis and subsequent treatment.
Project description:BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that alterations in gut microbiota composition are associated with the hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, the causal association between gut microbiota and HS remain undetermined.MethodsWe performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study summary data of gut microbiota and hidradenitis suppurativa from the MiBioGen consortium which concluded 18,340 individuals analyzed by the MiBioGen Consortium, comprising 211 gut microbiota. HS data were acquired from strictly defined HS data collected by FinnGenbiobank analysis, which included 211,548 European ancestors (409 HS patients, 211,139 controls). The inverse variance weighted method (IVW), weighted median (WME), simple model, weighted model, weighted median, and MR-Egger were used to determine the changes of HS pathogenic bacterial taxa, followed by sensitivity analysis including horizontal pleiotropy analysis. The MR Steiger test evaluated the strength of a causal association and the leave-one-out method assessed the reliability of the results. Additionally, a reverse MR analysis was carried out to seek for possible reverse causality.ResultsBy combining the findings of all the MR steps, we identified four causal bacterial taxa, namely, Family XI, Porphyromonadaceae, Clostridium innocuum group and Lachnospira. The risk of HS might be positively associated with a high relative abundance of Clostridium innocuum group (Odds ratio, OR 2.17, p = 0.00038) and Lachnospira (OR 2.45, p = 0.017) but negatively associated with Family XI (OR 0.67, p = 0.049) and Porphyromonadaceae (OR 0.29, p = 0.014). There were no noticeable outliers, horizontal pleiotropy, or heterogeneity. Furthermore, there was no proof of reverse causation found in the reverse MR study.ConclusionThis study indicates that Clostridium innocuum group and Lachnospira might have anti-protective effect on HS, whereas Family XI and Porphyromonadaceae might have a protective effect on HS. Our study reveals that there exists a beneficial or detrimental causal effect of gut microbiota composition on HS and offers potentially beneficial methods for therapy and avoidance of HS.
Project description:BackgroundGrowing evidence from observational studies and clinical trials suggests that the gut microbiota is associated with tuberculosis (TB). However, it is unclear whether any causal relationship exists between them and whether causality is bidirectional.MethodsA bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of gut microbiota were obtained from the MiBioGen consortium, while the GWAS summary statistics of TB and its specific phenotypes [respiratory tuberculosis (RTB) and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB)] were retrieved from the UK Biobank and the FinnGen consortium. And 195 bacterial taxa from phylum to genus were analyzed. Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, maximum likelihood (ML), weighted median, and weighted mode methods were applied to the MR analysis. The robustness of causal estimation was tested using the heterogeneity test, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out method.ResultsIn the UK Biobank database, we found that 11 bacterial taxa had potential causal effects on TB. Three bacterial taxa genus.Akkermansia, family.Verrucomicrobiacea, order.Verrucomicrobiales were validated in the FinnGen database. Based on the results in the FinnGen database, the present study found significant differences in the characteristics of gut microbial distribution between RTB and EPTB. Four bacterial taxa genus.LachnospiraceaeUCG010, genus.Parabacteroides, genus.RuminococcaceaeUCG011, and order.Bacillales were common traits in relation to both RTB and TB, among which order.Bacillales showed a protective effect. Additionally, family.Bacteroidacea and genus.Bacteroides were identified as common traits in relation to both EPTB and TB, positively associating with a higher risk of EPTB. In reverse MR analysis, no causal association was identified. No significant heterogeneity of instrumental variables (IVs) or horizontal pleiotropy was found.ConclusionOur study supports a one-way causal relationship between gut microbiota and TB, with gut microbiota having a causal effect on TB. The identification of characteristic gut microbiota provides scientific insights for the potential application of the gut microbiota as a preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic tool for TB.
Project description:BackgroundPathological scars, including keloids and hypertrophic scars, represent a significant dermatological challenge, and emerging evidence suggests a potential role for the gut microbiota in this process.MethodsUtilizing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) methodology, this study meticulously analyzed data from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) relevant to the gut microbiota, keloids, and hypertrophic scars. The integrity and reliability of the results were rigorously evaluated through sensitivity, heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and directionality analyses.ResultsBy employing inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, our findings revealed a causal influence of five bacterial taxa on keloid formation: class Melainabacteria, class Negativicutes, order Selenomonadales, family XIII, and genus Coprococcus2. Seven gut microbiota have been identified as having causal relationships with hypertrophic scars: class Alphaproteobacteria, family Clostridiaceae1, family Desulfovibrionaceae, genus Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group, genus Eubacterium fissicatena group, genus Erysipelotrichaceae UCG003 and genus Subdoligranulum. Additional sensitivity analyses further validated the robustness of the associations above.ConclusionOverall, our MR analysis supports the hypothesis that gut microbiota is causally linked to pathological scar formation, providing pivotal insights for future mechanistic and clinical research in this domain.