Dataset Information

PCG-net: feature adaptive deep learning for automated head and neck organs-at-risk segmentation.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Radiation therapy is a common treatment option for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC), where the accurate segmentation of Head and Neck (HN) Organs-AtRisks (OARs) is critical for effective treatment planning. Manual labeling of HN OARs is time-consuming and subjective. Therefore, deep learning segmentation methods have been widely used. However, it is still a challenging task for HN OARs segmentation due to some small-sized OARs such as optic chiasm and optic nerve.

Methods

To address this challenge, we propose a parallel network architecture called PCG-Net, which incorporates both convolutional neural networks (CNN) and a Gate-Axial-Transformer (GAT) to effectively capture local information and global context. Additionally, we employ a cascade graph module (CGM) to enhance feature fusion through message-passing functions and information aggregation strategies. We conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of PCG-Net and its robustness in three different downstream tasks.

Results

The results show that PCG-Net outperforms other methods, improves the accuracy of HN OARs segmentation, which can potentially improve treatment planning for HNC patients.

Discussion

In summary, the PCG-Net model effectively establishes the dependency between local information and global context and employs CGM to enhance feature fusion for accurate segment HN OARs. The results demonstrate the superiority of PCGNet over other methods, making it a promising approach for HNC treatment planning.

SUBMITTER: Luan S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10623055 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PCG-net: feature adaptive deep learning for automated head and neck organs-at-risk segmentation.

Luan Shunyao S Wei Changchao C Ding Yi Y Xue Xudong X Wei Wei W Yu Xiao X Wang Xiao X Ma Chi C Zhu Benpeng B

Frontiers in oncology 20231020

<h4>Introduction</h4>Radiation therapy is a common treatment option for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC), where the accurate segmentation of Head and Neck (HN) Organs-AtRisks (OARs) is critical for effective treatment planning. Manual labeling of HN OARs is time-consuming and subjective. Therefore, deep learning segmentation methods have been widely used. However, it is still a challenging task for HN OARs segmentation due to some small-sized OARs such as optic chiasm and optic nerve.<h4>Methods</h4>T ...[more]

PMID: 37927463

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionOrgan-at-risk segmentation for head and neck cancer radiation therapy is a complex and time-consuming process (requiring up to 42 individual structure, and may delay start of treatment or even limit access to function-preserving care. Feasibility of using a deep learning (DL) based autosegmentation model to reduce contouring time without compromising contour accuracy is assessed through a blinded randomized trial of radiation oncologists (ROs) using retrospective, de-identified patient data.MethodsTwo head and neck expert ROs used dedicated time to create gold standard (GS) contours on computed tomography (CT) images. 445 CTs were used to train a custom 3D U-Net DL model covering 42 organs-at-risk, with an additional 20 CTs were held out for the randomized trial. For each held-out patient dataset, one of the eight participant ROs was randomly allocated to review and revise the contours produced by the DL model, while another reviewed contours produced by a medical dosimetry assistant (MDA), both blinded to their origin. Time required for MDAs and ROs to contour was recorded, and the unrevised DL contours, as well as the RO-revised contours by the MDAs and DL model were compared to the GS for that patient.ResultsMean time for initial MDA contouring was 2.3 hours (range 1.6-3.8 hours) and RO-revision took 1.1 hours (range, 0.4-4.4 hours), compared to 0.7 hours (range 0.1-2.0 hours) for the RO-revisions to DL contours. Total time reduced by 76% (95%-Confidence Interval: 65%-88%) and RO-revision time reduced by 35% (95%-CI,-39%-91%). All geometric and dosimetric metrics computed, agreement with GS was equivalent or significantly greater (p<0.05) for RO-revised DL contours compared to the RO-revised MDA contours, including volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (VDSC), surface DSC, added path length, and the 95%-Hausdorff distance. 32 OARs (76%) had mean VDSC greater than 0.8 for the RO-revised DL contours, compared to 20 (48%) for RO-revised MDA contours, and 34 (81%) for the unrevised DL OARs.ConclusionDL autosegmentation demonstrated significant time-savings for organ-at-risk contouring while improving agreement with the institutional GS, indicating comparable accuracy of DL model. Integration into the clinical practice with a prospective evaluation is currently underway.

Project description:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of the superior constrictor, middle constrictor, inferior constrictor, and larynx in comparison with a traditional multi-atlas-based method. Methods and Materials: One hundred and five computed tomography image datasets from 83 head and neck cancer patients were retrospectively collected and the superior constrictor, middle constrictor, inferior constrictor, and larynx were analyzed for deep-learning versus multi-atlas-based segmentation. Eighty-three computed tomography images (40 diagnostic computed tomography and 43 planning computed tomography) were used for training the convolutional neural network, and for atlas-based model training. The remaining 22 computed tomography datasets were used for validation of the atlas-based auto-segmentation versus deep-learning-based auto-segmentation contours, both of which were compared with the corresponding manual contours. Quantitative measures included Dice similarity coefficient, recall, precision, Hausdorff distance, 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance. Dosimetric differences between the auto-generated contours and manual contours were evaluated. Subjective evaluation was obtained from 3 clinical observers to blindly score the autosegmented structures based on the percentage of slices that require manual modification. Results: The deep-learning-based auto-segmentation versus atlas-based auto-segmentation results were compared for the superior constrictor, middle constrictor, inferior constrictor, and larynx. The mean Dice similarity coefficient values for the 4 structures were 0.67, 0.60, 0.65, and 0.84 for deep-learning-based auto-segmentation, whereas atlas-based auto-segmentation has Dice similarity coefficient results at 0.45, 0.36, 0.50, and 0.70, respectively. The mean 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (cm) for the 4 structures were 0.41, 0.57, 0.59, and 0.54 for deep-learning-based auto-segmentation, but 0.78, 0.95, 0.96, and 1.23 for atlas-based auto-segmentation results, respectively. Similar mean dose differences were obtained from the 2 sets of autosegmented contours compared to manual contours. The dose-volume discrepancies and the average modification rates were higher with the atlas-based auto-segmentation contours. Conclusion: Swallowing-related structures are more accurately generated with DL-based versus atlas-based segmentation when compared with manual contours.

Project description:ObjectivesTo use convolutional neural network for fully automated segmentation and radiomics features extraction of hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC) tumor in MRI.MethodsMR images were collected from 222 HPC patients, among them 178 patients were used for training, and another 44 patients were recruited for testing. U-Net and DeepLab V3 + architectures were used for training the models. The model performance was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index, and average surface distance. The reliability of radiomics parameters of the tumor extracted by the models was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe predicted tumor volumes by DeepLab V3 + model and U-Net model were highly correlated with those delineated manually (p < 0.001). The DSC of DeepLab V3 + model was significantly higher than that of U-Net model (0.77 vs 0.75, p < 0.05), particularly in those small tumor volumes of < 10 cm3 (0.74 vs 0.70, p < 0.001). For radiomics extraction of the first-order features, both models exhibited high agreement (ICC: 0.71-0.91) with manual delineation. The radiomics extracted by DeepLab V3 + model had significantly higher ICCs than those extracted by U-Net model for 7 of 19 first-order features and for 8 of 17 shape-based features (p < 0.05).ConclusionBoth DeepLab V3 + and U-Net models produced reasonable results in automated segmentation and radiomic features extraction of HPC on MR images, whereas DeepLab V3 + had a better performance than U-Net.Clinical relevance statementThe deep learning model, DeepLab V3 + , exhibited promising performance in automated tumor segmentation and radiomics extraction for hypopharyngeal cancer on MRI. This approach holds great potential for enhancing the radiotherapy workflow and facilitating prediction of treatment outcomes.Key points• DeepLab V3 + and U-Net models produced reasonable results in automated segmentation and radiomic features extraction of HPC on MR images. • DeepLab V3 + model was more accurate than U-Net in automated segmentation, especially on small tumors. • DeepLab V3 + exhibited higher agreement for about half of the first-order and shape-based radiomics features than U-Net.

Project description:Purpose Fast and accurate auto-segmentation on daily images is essential for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–guided adaptive radiation therapy (ART). However, the state-of-the-art auto-segmentation based on deep learning still has limited success, particularly for complex structures in the abdomen. This study aimed to develop an automatic contour refinement (ACR) process to quickly correct for unacceptable auto-segmented contours. Methods and Materials An improved level set–based active contour model (ACM) was implemented for the ACR process and was tested on the deep learning–based auto-segmentation of 80 abdominal MRI sets along with their ground truth contours. The performance of the ACR process was evaluated using 4 contour accuracy metrics: the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), surface DSC, and added path length (APL) on the auto-segmented contours of the small bowel, large bowel, combined bowels, pancreas, duodenum, and stomach. Results A portion (3%-39%) of the corrected contours became practically acceptable per the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 132 (TG-132) recommendation (DSC >0.8 and MDA <3 mm). The best correction performance was seen in the combined bowels, where for the contours with major errors (initial DSC <0.5 or MDA >8 mm), the mean DSC increased from 0.34 to 0.59, the mean MDA decreased from 7.02 mm to 5.23 mm, and the APL reduced by almost 20 mm, whereas for the contours with minor errors, the mean DSC increased from 0.72 to 0.79, the mean MDA decreased from 3.35 mm to 3.29 mm, and more than one-third (39%) of the ACR contours became clinically acceptable. The execution time for the ACR process on one subregion was less than 2 seconds using an NVIDIA GTX 1060 GPU. Conclusions The ACR process implemented based on the ACM was able to quickly correct for some inaccurate contours produced from MRI-based deep learning auto-segmentation of complex abdominal anatomy. The ACR method may be integrated into the auto-segmentation step to accelerate the process of MRI-guided ART.

Dataset Information

PCG-net: feature adaptive deep learning for automated head and neck organs-at-risk segmentation.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

PCG-net: feature adaptive deep learning for automated head and neck organs-at-risk segmentation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets