Dataset Information

Deep learning auto-segmentation and automated treatment planning for trismus risk reduction in head and neck cancer radiotherapy

ABSTRACT:

Background and Purpose

Reducing trismus in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) is important. Automated deep learning (DL) segmentation and automated planning was used to introduce new and rarely segmented masticatory structures to study if trismus risk could be decreased.

Materials and Methods

Auto-segmentation was based on purpose-built DL, and automated planning used our in-house system, ECHO. Treatment plans for ten HNC patients, treated with 2 Gy × 35 fractions, were optimized (ECHO0). Six manually segmented OARs were replaced with DL auto-segmentations and the plans re-optimized (ECHO1). In a third set of plans, mean doses for auto-segmented ipsilateral masseter and medial pterygoid (MIMean, MPIMean), derived from a trismus risk model, were implemented as dose-volume objectives (ECHO2). Clinical dose-volume criteria were compared between the two scenarios (ECHO0vs. ECHO1; ECHO1vs. ECHO2; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; significance: p < 0.01).

Results

Small systematic differences were observed between the doses to the six auto-segmented OARs and their manual counterparts (median: ECHO1 = 6.2 (range: 0.4, 21) Gy vs. ECHO0 = 6.6 (range: 0.3, 22) Gy; p = 0.007), and the ECHO1 plans provided improved normal tissue sparing across a larger dose-volume range. Only in the ECHO2 plans, all patients fulfilled both MIMean and MPIMean criteria. The population median MIMean and MPIMean were considerably lower than those suggested by the trismus model (ECHO0: MIMean = 13 Gy vs. ≤42 Gy; MPIMean = 29 Gy vs. ≤68 Gy).

Conclusions

Automated treatment planning can efficiently incorporate new structures from DL auto-segmentation, which results in trismus risk sparing without deteriorating treatment plan quality. Auto-planning and deep learning auto-segmentation together provide a powerful platform to further improve treatment planning.

SUBMITTER: Thor M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8552336 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionOrgan-at-risk segmentation for head and neck cancer radiation therapy is a complex and time-consuming process (requiring up to 42 individual structure, and may delay start of treatment or even limit access to function-preserving care. Feasibility of using a deep learning (DL) based autosegmentation model to reduce contouring time without compromising contour accuracy is assessed through a blinded randomized trial of radiation oncologists (ROs) using retrospective, de-identified patient data.MethodsTwo head and neck expert ROs used dedicated time to create gold standard (GS) contours on computed tomography (CT) images. 445 CTs were used to train a custom 3D U-Net DL model covering 42 organs-at-risk, with an additional 20 CTs were held out for the randomized trial. For each held-out patient dataset, one of the eight participant ROs was randomly allocated to review and revise the contours produced by the DL model, while another reviewed contours produced by a medical dosimetry assistant (MDA), both blinded to their origin. Time required for MDAs and ROs to contour was recorded, and the unrevised DL contours, as well as the RO-revised contours by the MDAs and DL model were compared to the GS for that patient.ResultsMean time for initial MDA contouring was 2.3 hours (range 1.6-3.8 hours) and RO-revision took 1.1 hours (range, 0.4-4.4 hours), compared to 0.7 hours (range 0.1-2.0 hours) for the RO-revisions to DL contours. Total time reduced by 76% (95%-Confidence Interval: 65%-88%) and RO-revision time reduced by 35% (95%-CI,-39%-91%). All geometric and dosimetric metrics computed, agreement with GS was equivalent or significantly greater (p<0.05) for RO-revised DL contours compared to the RO-revised MDA contours, including volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (VDSC), surface DSC, added path length, and the 95%-Hausdorff distance. 32 OARs (76%) had mean VDSC greater than 0.8 for the RO-revised DL contours, compared to 20 (48%) for RO-revised MDA contours, and 34 (81%) for the unrevised DL OARs.ConclusionDL autosegmentation demonstrated significant time-savings for organ-at-risk contouring while improving agreement with the institutional GS, indicating comparable accuracy of DL model. Integration into the clinical practice with a prospective evaluation is currently underway.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Since intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has become popular for the treatment of gynecologic cancers, the contouring process has become more critical. This study evaluated the feasibility of atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) for contouring in patients with endometrial and cervical cancers. METHODS:A total of 75 sets of planning CT images from 75 patients were collected. Contours for the pelvic nodal clinical target volume (CTV), femur, and bladder were carefully generated by two skilled radiation oncologists. Of 75 patients, 60 were randomly registered in three different atlas libraries for ABAS in groups of 20, 40, or 60. ABAS was conducted in 15 patients, followed by manual correction (ABASc). The time required to generate all contours was recorded, and the accuracy of segmentation was assessed using Dice's coefficient (DC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD) and compared to those of manually delineated contours. RESULTS:For ABAS-CTV, the best results were achieved with groups of 60 patients (DC, 0.79; HD, 19.7?mm) and the worst results with groups of 20 patients (DC, 0.75; p?=?0.012; HD, 21.3?mm; p?=?0.002). ABASc-CTV performed better than ABAS-CTV in terms of both HD and DC (ABASc [n?=?60]; DC, 0.84; HD, 15.6?mm; all p?<?0.017). ABAS required an average of 45.1?s, whereas ABASc required 191.1?s; both methods required less time than the manual methods (p?<?0.001). Both ABAS-Femur and simultaneous ABAS-Bilateral-femurs showed satisfactory performance, regardless of the atlas library used (DC >?0.9 and HD ?10.0?mm), with significant time reduction compared to that needed for manual delineation (p?<?0.001). However, ABAS-Bladder did not prove to be feasible, with inferior results regardless of library size (DC?<?0.6 and HD?>?40?mm). Furthermore, ABASc-Bladder required a longer processing time than manual contouring to achieve the same accuracy. CONCLUSIONS:ABAS could help physicians to delineate the CTV and organs-at-risk (e.g., femurs) in IMRT planning considering its consistency, efficacy, and accuracy.

Project description:BackgroundOver half a million individuals are diagnosed with head and neck cancer each year globally. Radiotherapy is an important curative treatment for this disease, but it requires manual time to delineate radiosensitive organs at risk. This planning process can delay treatment while also introducing interoperator variability, resulting in downstream radiation dose differences. Although auto-segmentation algorithms offer a potentially time-saving solution, the challenges in defining, quantifying, and achieving expert performance remain.ObjectiveAdopting a deep learning approach, we aim to demonstrate a 3D U-Net architecture that achieves expert-level performance in delineating 21 distinct head and neck organs at risk commonly segmented in clinical practice.MethodsThe model was trained on a data set of 663 deidentified computed tomography scans acquired in routine clinical practice and with both segmentations taken from clinical practice and segmentations created by experienced radiographers as part of this research, all in accordance with consensus organ at risk definitions.ResultsWe demonstrated the model's clinical applicability by assessing its performance on a test set of 21 computed tomography scans from clinical practice, each with 21 organs at risk segmented by 2 independent experts. We also introduced surface Dice similarity coefficient, a new metric for the comparison of organ delineation, to quantify the deviation between organ at risk surface contours rather than volumes, better reflecting the clinical task of correcting errors in automated organ segmentations. The model's generalizability was then demonstrated on 2 distinct open-source data sets, reflecting different centers and countries to model training.ConclusionsDeep learning is an effective and clinically applicable technique for the segmentation of the head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy. With appropriate validation studies and regulatory approvals, this system could improve the efficiency, consistency, and safety of radiotherapy pathways.