Dataset Information

Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR).

Methods

Eighty patients (mean age = 63 years, 48 males) with medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three ways to CLTP (n = 25), CTP (n = 26) or CSP (n = 29) femoral UKR components. The patients were followed 5 years postoperatively with RSA, bone mineral density (BMD), PROMs and radiological evaluation of radiolucent lines (RLL), femoral component flexion angle and complications.

Results

At the 5-year follow-up, femoral component total translation was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.60). Femoral component internal rotation was 0.50° (95% CI 0.3; 0.69) for the CLTP group, 0.58° (95% CI 0.38; 0.77) for the CTP group and 0.25° (95% CI 0.07; 0.43) for the CSP group (p = 0.01). BMD decreased peri-prosthetically (range - 11.5%; - 14.0%) until 6-month follow-up and increased toward the 5-year follow-up (range - 3.6%; - 5.8%). BMD change did not correlate with component migration. Lower flexion angle was correlated with higher 5-year subsidence, total translation, varus rotation and maximum total point motion (p = 0.01). Two patients (1 CLTP, 1 CTP) had RLL in the posterior zone. There were two revisions.

Conclusion

At 5-year follow-up, fixation of UKA femoral components with twin-peg was not superior to the single-peg design. Cementless and cemented twin-peg femoral components had similar fixation. A lower flexion angle was correlated with higher component migration.

SUBMITTER: Mosegaard SB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10635966 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study.

Mosegaard Sebastian Breddam SB Odgaard Anders A Madsen Frank F Rømer Lone L Kristensen Per Wagner PW Vind Tobias Dahl TD Søballe Kjeld K Stilling Maiken M

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 20230811 12

<h4>Background</h4>The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR).<h4>Methods</h4>Eighty patients (mean age = 63 years, 48 males) with medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three ways to CLTP (n = 25), CTP (n = 26) or CSP (n = 29) ...[more]

PMID: 37568057

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeCementless arthroplasty fixation relies on early bone ingrowth and may be poor in patients with low proximal tibial bone density or abnormal bone turnover. We aimed first to describe the baseline bone properties in patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), and second to investigate its association with cemented and cementless tibial component migration until 2 years.MethodsA subset investigation of 2 patient groups from a 3-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted. There were 26 cemented and 25 cementless medial UKRs with twin-pegged femoral components. Volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and microstructure of the excised medial tibial plateau were ascertained with µCT. Bone turnover was estimated using dynamic histomorphometry (eroded surface/bone surface = ES/BS, osteoid surface/bone surface = OS/BS, mineralizing surface/bone surface = MS/BS). Tibial component migration in 4 feature points was followed for 2 years with radiostereometry.ResultsAt the 2-year follow-up, the cementless tibial components migrated 0.38 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.62) total translation more than the cemented components at the posterior feature point. The greatest migration in the cementless group was subsidence at the posterior feature point of 0.66 mm (CI 0.48-0.84) until 6 weeks, and from 3 months the components were stable. Cemented tibial components subsided very little. Between 1- and 2-year follow-ups, no cementless but 4 cemented tibial components revealed continuous migration. OS/BS was half of the ES/BS. No µCT or histomorphometric parameters showed any clinically relevant correlation with tibial component migration at the posterior feature point for either cemented or cementless UKR at 6 weeks' or 2 years' follow-up after adjustment for age, BMI, and sex.ConclusionPreoperative vBMD, bone turnover, and microstructure were not associated with postoperative tibial component migration of cemented and cementless medial UKR.

Project description:BackgroundIn medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA), the position of the bearing does not correspond to the planned position which will increasing the risk of bearing dislocation. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the malposition of the femoral and tibial components and the phenomenon of bearing deviation using postoperative radiological measurements.MethodsOne hundred twenty patients who underwent mobile-bearing uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) at our hospital between January and August 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Standard anteroposterior radiographs were obtained postoperatively using C-arm fluoroscopy. A 3D-2D image matching method was used to measure the femoral component varus/valgus angle and internal/external rotation (IR/ER) relative to the tibial component. The bearing position parameters were measured. Patients were divided into varus/valgus and IR/ER groups according to the femoral component varus/valgus and IR/ER angles. The bearing position parameters of each group were compared separately.ResultsThere were 57 patients in the varus group, 63 in the valgus group, 59 in the IR group, and 61 in the ER group. The distance between the bearing lateral edge and the lateral wall of the tibial component (W-BED) was significantly lower in the varus group than the valgus group (1.9 [0-6.4] vs. 2.8 [0.3-7.7] mm; P < 0.001). No differences were detected in any bearing position parameters. The varus/valgus angle of the femoral component showed a significant negative correlation with the W-BED. The IR/ER angle of the femoral component showed no significant correlation with any of the positional parameters.ConclusionsImplantation of femoral component with varus/valgus angle relative to tibial component can cause the bearing to deviate from the planned position. If the varus/valgus angle exceeds 8° it can cause the bearing to hit or away from the lateral wall of the tibial component, resulting in an increased risk of dislocation of the bearing.

Project description:BackgroundPatients who undergo massive femoral malignant tumor (MFMT) resection often exhibit shortened femoral metaphyseal juxta-articular segments. The use of a customized femoral endoprosthesis (CFE) with an intra-neck curved stem (INCS) has emerged as a viable reconstructive surgical strategy for these individuals. Relative to a cemented INCS, it remains unclear as to whether cementless INCS use is associated with improvements in functionality or reconstructive longevity. As such, the present study was conducted to compare functional outcomes, endoprosthetic survival, and endoprosthesis-related complication rates in patients undergoing cemented and cementless INCS implantation.MethodsA total of 24 patients undergoing lower limb salvage and reconstructive surgical procedures utilizing cemented or cementless INCS endoprostheses were retrospectively included. Patient-functional outcomes, endoprosthetic survival, and complication rates were compared as a function of age; diagnosis; the length of femoral resection; residual proximal femur length; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores; visual analog scale (VAS) scores; and the rates of implant breakage, periprosthetic infections, periprosthetic fractures, and aseptic loosening.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 56 months. Significant differences in the length of femoral resection (p<0.001) and residual proximal femur length were observed (p<0.001) between the cemented and cementless INCS groups. There were no differences in overall patient survival and aseptic loosening-associated endoprosthesis survival in the cemented and cementless groups. None of the included patients experienced periprosthetic fractures, infections, or implant breakage. Average respective MSTS and VAS scores did not differ between groups.ConclusionFor patients undergoing treatment for MFMTs, the use of a CFE with an INCS has emerged as a viable approach to hip-preserving reconstructive surgery. With appropriately designed individualized rehabilitative programs, good functional outcomes can be achieved for these endoprostheses, which are associated with low complication rates. Moreover, the selection between cemented or cementless INCS in the clinic should be made based on patient-specific factors, with cementless INCS implementation being preferable in younger patients with good-quality bone, the potential for long-term survival, and the osteotomy site near the lesser trochanter, whereas cemented INCS use should be favored for individuals who are older, have a shorter life expectancy, or have poor bone quality.

Dataset Information

Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets