Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about the rate and predictors of finding lesions of monoclonal gammopathy (MG) of renal significance (MGRS) on kidney biopsy specimens among patients with MG.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records from 2013 to 2018 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, to identify patients with MG and whether they had undergone a kidney biopsy. In a more select group of patients with MG from 2017 to 2018, we conducted a review of records to determine how many had underlying CKD, which of those with CKD had undergone a kidney biopsy, and reasons for deferring a kidney biopsy.ResultsBetween 2013 and 2018, we identified 6300 patients who had MG, 160 (2.5%) of whom had undergone a kidney biopsy. Of the 160 patients, 64 (40%) had an MGRS lesion; amyloid light chain amyloidosis, the most common finding, accounted for nearly half of these lesions. In the non-MGRS group comprising 96 patients, 23 had arteriosclerosis, the most common finding. In multivariate analysis, strong predictors of finding an MGRS lesion included the presence of an elevated free light chain ratio, proteinuria, and hematuria. Among 596 patients with CKD and MG from 2017 to 2018, 62 (10.4%) underwent a kidney biopsy. Kidney biopsy was deferred for 70 patients (20%); for 62 of the 70, the diagnosis was already known, and eight were not candidates for therapy. Younger age and higher proteinuria and serum creatinine levels increased the likelihood that the patient would undergo a kidney biopsy.ConclusionsProteinuria ≥1.5 g/d, hematuria, and an elevated free light chain ratio increase the likelihood of finding MGRS, and a kidney biopsy should be highly considered in such patients.
Project description:The clinical spectrum of diseases associated with monoclonal gammopathies is wide and they are most commonly the consequence of renal deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin or its components. The differential diagnosis is difficult and renal biopsy is essential. To distinguish many of these pathologies is necessary to use techniques that are not always available, even in tertiary central hospitals. This review will discuss the clinical presentation, pathologic features, treatment, prognosis and common diagnostic difficulties of these entities.
Project description:We report a case of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance in a 63-year-old man who presented with nephrotic-range proteinuria and renal insufficiency. The kidney biopsy showed a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis pattern with extensive crystalloid deposits in the glomerular capillary endothelial cells and very few in the tubular epithelial cells. The immunoperoxidase staining showed kappa light chain restriction. Subsequently, the bone marrow showed 6% plasma cells which confirmed the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. He responded well to bortezomib treatment with resolution of the nephrotic syndrome and normalization of renal function after 7 months.
Project description:Recent years have witnessed a rapid growth in our understanding of the pathogenic property of monoclonal proteins. It is evident that some of these small monoclonal proteins are capable of inducing end-organ damage as a result of their intrinsic physicochemical properties. Hence, an umbrella term, monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS), has been coined to include myriad conditions attributed to these pathogenic proteins. Because kidneys are the most commonly affected organ (but skin, peripheral nerves, and heart can also be involved), we discuss MGRS exclusively in this review. Mechanisms of renal damage may involve direct or indirect effects. Renal biopsy is mandatory and demonstration of monoclonal immunoglobulin in kidney, along with the corresponding immunoglobulin in serum or urine, is key to establish the diagnosis. Pitfalls exist at each diagnostic step, and a high degree of clinical suspicion is required to diagnose MGRS. Recognition of MGRS by hematologists and nephrologists is important, because timely clone-directed therapy improves renal outcomes. Autologous stem cell transplant may benefit selected patients.
Project description:PurposeDiagnostic criteria for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) do not currently include ocular phenotypic changes. Here, we offer a new diagnostic approach that is useful in patients with posteriorly located corneal depositions and present evidence to support the theory that the aqueous humor is a source for monoclonal proteins accumulated in the cornea.ObservationsA 77-year-old woman presented to the clinic with a gradual decrease in visual acuity over 6 months. Slit lamp examination revealed bilateral central guttae consistent with Fuchs corneal dystrophy, peripheral circular band-like corneal opacities in the deep stroma, and bilateral nuclear sclerotic and cortical cataracts. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography confirmed corneal opacities in the posterior stroma and Descemet membrane. Immunological studies revealed increased serum IgG levels of 3220 mg/dL and serum electrophoresis showed an abnormal monoclonal band of 2.4 g/dL identified as IgG lambda by immunofixation electrophoresis. The patient was referred to the hematology clinic where she underwent further systemic workup and was diagnosed with MGUS. Immunofixation electrophoresis of aqueous sampling, which was performed at the time of cataract surgery, confirmed the presence of the IgG lambda gammopathy in the anterior chamber.Conclusions and importanceMonoclonal gammopathy, although rare, should be included in the differential diagnosis of corneal opacities, as the ocular finding can be the initial manifestation of a systemic disease that can potentially be life-threatening. When corneal biopsy is not feasible due to the location of corneal pathology, aqueous sampling may be an alternative approach towards a clinical diagnosis. We propose a new terminology, "monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance," for patients diagnosed with MGUS, however, their only significant clinical finding is ocular manifestation.
Project description:IntroductionThe term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) has been described to include patients with renal manifestations associated with circulating monoclonal proteins with or without a clonal lymphoproliferation (B-cell or plasma cell) and not meeting diagnostic criteria for an overt hematological malignancy. A host of MGRS-associated lesions have been described that involve various renal compartments. Our study describes the histomorphological spectrum of MGRS cases at our center in the last 5 years and description as per the classification system of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group (IKMG).Material and methodsRetrospective analysis was carried out of all the renal biopsies with characteristic monoclonal immunoglobulin lesions for histopathological diagnosis between years 2015 and 2020 and reviewed by two independent pathologists.ResultsMost patients in the study belonged to the fifth decade, with a median age of 50 years (mean 50.14 ± 10.43) range (24-68 years) with a male preponderance. Most patients presented with proteinuria as the sole manifestation (66.6%). Many of the patients (48%) had an M spike by serum protein electrophoresis or urinary protein electrophoresis with an abnormal serum free light chain assay (60.8%). AL amyloidosis was the most common diagnosis observed on histopathological evaluation (68.7%), followed by light chain deposition disease (10.4%).ConclusionMGRS lesions are infrequently encountered in the practice of nephropathology and pose a diagnostic challenge due to the limitation of a congruent clinical or hematological picture. A thorough histological examination with immunofluorescence and electron microscopy often precipitates in the right diagnosis and prompts timely management.
Project description:Monoclonal gammopathy has emerged as an important cause of renal injury. Since the clinicopathologic features related to monotypic monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance with IgM monoclonal gammopathy (IgM-MGRS) are poorly described and it is uncertain if intervention improves renal survival and mortality, we report a series of such patients, characterizing their clinicopathologic spectrum and outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 38 patients referred to one medical center between 2009 and 2019 with detectable serum monoclonal IgM by immunofixation, performance of a bone marrow biopsy and kidney biopsy-proven MGRS. Of the 38 patients identified, about half patients were amyloidosis, followed by cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of their kidney pathology: amyloid and non-amyloid. Patients with non-amyloidosis were more likely to have renal dysfunction, hematuria, anemia and hypocomplementemia and κ light chain was predominant in this sub-group. Amyloid patients were more often treated with chemotherapy than the non-amyloid patients (P = 0.002). There were no significant differences between amyloid and non-amyloid patients in mortality (48% vs 29%, P = 0.467) and incidence of ESRD (19% vs 59%, P = 0.103). The incidence of ESRD was lower in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or ASCT, compared to those without chemotherapy (25% vs 57%, P = 0.049), and it was also lower in the hematologic responders than non-responders (10% vs 40%, P = 0.047). Our study confirmed a diverse variety of clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with IgM-MGRS. Chemotherapy and/or ASCT and deep hematologic responses might improve renal prognosis.