Dataset Information

Genome-wide Polygenic Risk Scores Predict Risk of Glioma and Molecular Subtypes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregate the contribution of many risk variants to provide a personalized genetic susceptibility profile. Since sample sizes of glioma genome-wide association studies (GWAS) remain modest, there is a need to find efficient ways of capturing genetic risk factors using available germline data.

Methods

We developed a novel PRS (PRS-CS) that uses continuous shrinkage priors to model the joint effects of over 1 million polymorphisms on disease risk and compared it to an approach (PRS-CT) that selects a limited set of independent variants that reach genome-wide significance (P<5×10^-8). PRS models were trained using GWAS results stratified by histological (10,346 cases, 14,687 controls) and molecular subtype (2,632 cases, 2,445 controls), and validated in two independent cohorts.

Results

PRS-CS was consistently more predictive than PRS-CT across glioma subtypes with an average increase in explained variance (R²) of 21%. Improvements were particularly pronounced for glioblastoma tumors, with PRS-CS yielding larger effect sizes (odds ratio (OR)=1.93, P=2.0×10^-54 vs. OR=1.83, P=9.4×10^-50) and higher explained variance (R²=2.82% vs. R²=2.56%). Individuals in the 95^th percentile of the PRS-CS distribution had a 3-fold higher lifetime absolute risk of IDH mutant (0.63%) and IDH wildtype (0.76%) glioma relative to individuals with average PRS. PRS-CS also showed high classification accuracy for IDH mutation status among cases (AUC=0.895).

Conclusions

Our novel genome-wide PRS may improve the identification of high-risk individuals and help distinguish between prognostic glioma subtypes, increasing the potential clinical utility of germline genetics in glioma patient management.

SUBMITTER: Nakase T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10802631 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genome-wide Polygenic Risk Scores Predict Risk of Glioma and Molecular Subtypes.

Nakase Taishi T Guerra Geno G Ostrom Quinn T QT Ge Tian T Melin Beatrice B Wrensch Margaret M Wiencke John K JK Jenkins Robert B RB Eckel-Passow Jeanette E JE Bondy Melissa L ML Francis Stephen S SS Kachuri Linda L

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences 20240111

<h4>Background</h4>Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregate the contribution of many risk variants to provide a personalized genetic susceptibility profile. Since sample sizes of glioma genome-wide association studies (GWAS) remain modest, there is a need to find efficient ways of capturing genetic risk factors using available germline data.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed a novel PRS (PRS-CS) that uses continuous shrinkage priors to model the joint effects of over 1 million polymorphisms on disease ri ...[more]

PMID: 38260701

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aggression and callous, uncaring, and unemotional (CU) traits are clinically related behavioral constructs caused by genetic and environmental factors. We performed polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses to investigate shared genetic etiology between aggression and these three CU-traits. Furthermore, we studied interactions of PRS with smoking during pregnancy and childhood life events in relation to CU-traits. Summary statistics for the base phenotype were derived from the EAGLE-consortium genome-wide association study of children's aggressive behavior and were used to calculate individual-level genome-wide and gene-set PRS in the NeuroIMAGE target-sample. Target phenotypes were 'callousness', 'uncaring', and 'unemotional' sumscores of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional traits. A total of 779 subjects and 1,192,414 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were available for PRS-analyses. Gene-sets comprised serotonergic, dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and neuroendocrine signaling pathways. Genome-wide PRS showed evidence of association with uncaring scores (explaining up to 1.59% of variance; self-contained Q = 0.0306, competitive-P = 0.0015). Dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and neuroendocrine PRS showed evidence of association with unemotional scores (explaining up to 1.33, 2.00, and 1.20% of variance respectively; self-contained Q-values 0.037, 0.0115, and 0.0473 respectively, competitive-P-values 0.0029, 0.0002, and 0.0045 respectively). Smoking during pregnancy related to callousness scores while childhood life events related to both callousness and unemotionality. Moreover, dopaminergic PRS appeared to interact with childhood life events in relation to unemotional scores. Our study provides evidence suggesting shared genetic etiology between aggressive behavior and uncaring, and unemotional CU-traits in children. Gene-set PRS confirmed involvement of shared glutamatergic, dopaminergic, and neuroendocrine genetic variation in aggression and CU-traits. Replication of current findings is needed.

Project description:BackgroundHypertensive disorders during pregnancy are associated with the risk of long-term cardiovascular disease after pregnancy, but it has not yet been determined whether genetic predisposition for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy can predict the risk for long-term cardiovascular disease.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the risk for long-term atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease according to polygenic risk scores for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.Study designAmong UK Biobank participants, we included European-descent women (n=164,575) with at least 1 live birth. Participants were divided according to genetic risk categorized by polygenic risk scores for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (low risk, score ≤25th percentile; medium risk, score 25th∼75th percentile; high risk, score >75th percentile), and were evaluated for incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as the new occurrence of one of the following: coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or peripheral artery disease.ResultsAmong the study population, 2427 (1.5%) had a history of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, and 8942 (5.6%) developed incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease after enrollment. Women with high genetic risk for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy had a higher prevalence of hypertension at enrollment. After enrollment, women with high genetic risk for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy had an increased risk for incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and peripheral artery disease, compared with those with low genetic risk, even after adjustment for history of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.ConclusionHigh genetic risk for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy was associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This study provides evidence on the informative value of polygenic risk scores for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy in prediction of long-term cardiovascular outcomes later in life.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the benefit of combining polygenic risk scores with the QCancer-10 (colorectal cancer) prediction model for non-genetic risk to identify people at highest risk of colorectal cancer.DesignPopulation based cohort study.SettingData from the UK Biobank study, collected between March 2006 and July 2010.Participants434 587 individuals with complete data for genetics and QCancer-10 predictions were included in the QCancer-10 plus polygenic risk score modelling and validation cohorts.Main outcome measuresPrediction of colorectal cancer diagnosis by genetic, non-genetic, and combined risk models. Using data from UK Biobank, six different polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer were developed using LDpred2 polygenic risk score software, clumping, and thresholding approaches, and a model based on genome-wide significant polymorphisms. The top performing genome-wide polygenic risk score and the score containing genome-wide significant polymorphisms were combined with QCancer-10 and performance was compared with QCancer-10 alone. Case-control (logistic regression) and time-to-event (Cox proportional hazards) analyses were used to evaluate risk model performance in men and women.ResultsPolygenic risk scores derived using the LDpred2 program performed best, with an odds ratio per standard deviation of 1.584 (95% confidence interval 1.536 to 1.633), and top age and sex adjusted C statistic of 0.733 (95% confidence interval 0.710 to 0.753) in logistic regression models in the validation cohort. Integrated QCancer-10 plus polygenic risk score models out-performed QCancer-10 alone. In men, the integrated LDpred2 model produced a C statistic of 0.730 (0.720 to 0.741) and explained variation of 28.2% (26.3 to 30.1), compared with 0.693 (0.682 to 0.704) and 21.0% (18.9 to 23.1) for QCancer-10 alone. In women, the C statistic for the integrated LDpred2 model was 0.687 (0.673 to 0.702) and explained variation was 21.0% (18.7 to 23.7), compared with 0.645 (0.631 to 0.659) and 12.4% (10.3 to 14.6) for QCancer-10 alone. In the top 20% of individuals at highest absolute risk, the sensitivity and specificity of the integrated LDpred2 models for predicting colorectal cancer diagnosis was 47.8% and 80.3% respectively in men, and 42.7% and 80.1% respectively in women, with increases in absolute risk in the top 5% of risk in men of 3.47-fold and in women of 2.77-fold compared with the median. Illustrative decision curve analysis indicated a small incremental improvement in net benefit with QCancer-10 plus polygenic risk score models compared with QCancer-10 alone.ConclusionsIntegrating polygenic risk scores with QCancer-10 modestly improves risk prediction over use of QCancer-10 alone. Given that QCancer-10 data can be obtained relatively easily from health records, use of polygenic risk score in risk stratified population screening for colorectal cancer currently has no clear justification. The added benefit, cost effectiveness, and acceptability of polygenic risk scores should be carefully evaluated in a real life screening setting before implementation in the general population.

Dataset Information

Genome-wide Polygenic Risk Scores Predict Risk of Glioma and Molecular Subtypes.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Genome-wide Polygenic Risk Scores Predict Risk of Glioma and Molecular Subtypes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets