Dataset Information

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of programmed cell death 1/its ligand inhibitors plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, have improved the therapeutic outcome for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of combination therapies, such as programmed cell death 1(PD-1)/its ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, in targeting different pathways remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether the addition of a CTLA-4 inhibitor to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy improves the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in NSCLC. Methods: We systematically searched various electronic databases for suitable trials. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 with and without CTLA-4 were included in the analyses. The meta-analysis software RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of seven RCTs were retrieved. The results suggested that the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors did not show enhanced efficacy over PD1/PDL-1 inhibitor monotherapy as determined by overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.84-1.14, p = 0.79), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81-1.06, p = 0.25), and objective response rate (ORR) (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.96-1.21, p = 0.19). Furthermore, the combination immunotherapy was associated increased toxicity as evidenced by increased incidence of any type adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.00-1.13, p = 0.03), grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.36-1.82, p < 0.05), and treatment discontinuation (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.46-2.28, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Combining anti-CTLA-4 with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy did not improve the therapeutic efficacy, and was associated with greater toxicity than anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigation of the combination immunotherapy in specific subsets of patients is warranted to identify and define the patient-specific benefits of this combination. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023435399.

SUBMITTER: Lin L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10877718 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of programmed cell death 1/its ligand inhibitors plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Lin Li L Xiao Lu L Li Lei L Chen Chen C Zhang Haorong H Yu Changyan C Zhang Lanfang L Wei Anhua A Li Wei W

Frontiers in pharmacology 20240205

<b>Background:</b> Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, have improved the therapeutic outcome for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of combination therapies, such as programmed cell death 1(PD-1)/its ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, in targeting different pathways remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether the addition of a CTLA-4 inhibitor ...[more]

PMID: 38379896

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsAuthors conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline for randomized controlled trials comparing the prognosis and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors with other therapies for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect sizes. The primary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival.ResultsA total of 4943 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included in the analysis of the 6 randomized controlled trials. The results showed that patients receiving dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors had a longer survival time compared with the control group (HR = 0.88, P = 0.044). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (HR = 0.95, P = 0.579). Subgroup analysis revealed better OS in the interventional group for patients aged >65 years (HR = 0.88, P = 0.076), smokers (HR = 0.81, P = 0.036), and those with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥20 mut/Mb (HR = 0.66, P < 0.001). Conversely, the control group demonstrated superior OS in patients with TMB <20 mut/Mb (HR = 1.14, P = 0.048). In addition, the statistical results indicated a lower incidence rate of any-grade anemia in the dual immunotherapy group compared with the control group (RR = 0.32, P = 0.04).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors for treating advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Its efficacy is influenced by certain clinical and pathological factors, such as age, smoking status, and TMB.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint regulators, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) have emerged as promising new targets for cancer therapeutics. While tumor expression of PD-L1 has been shown to have objective responses to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapies, the clinical implications of CTLA-4 expression in tumor cells or immune cells in the tumor microenvironment is still controversial. We investigated the expression of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 in human breast tumors and provided a scoring system for the systematic evaluation of CTLA-4 staining.MethodsImmunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 and CTLA-4 expression was performed on a tissue microarray of 102 cores, which included normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Neoplastic cores were divided into four groups: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive tubular carcinoma (ITC). PD-L1 and CTLA-4 expressions were scored based on a system which accounted for the percentage and intensity of positivity and results provided in conjunction with available clinical and demographic data.ResultsOverall, CTLA-4 was over-expressed in 49 of 93 (52.7%) breast tumors. Subcategorically, CTLA-4 was positive in 3 of 8 (37.5%) ductal carcinoma in situ, 40 of 73 (55%) of invasive ductal carcinomas, 4 of 10 (40%) of invasive lobular carcinomas and 2 of 2 (100%) of invasive tubular carcinomas. All 6 normal breast tissues were interpreted as negative for CTLA-4 staining. Only 4.1% of the invasive ductal carcinomas were positive for PD-L1 reactivity and the remaining carcinomas stained negative.ConclusionsThis study shows a significant overexpression of CTLA-4 in >50% of breast carcinomas with no such overexpression of CTLA-4 in benign breast tissues. PDL-1 staining is seen in only a small number of invasive ductal carcinomas (4.1%). These findings suggest the need for further investigation of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapies and their efficacy in the treatment of breast carcinomas with overexpression of these immune modulators. In addition, the proposed scoring system will facilitate a more systematic correlation between tumor reactivity and clinical outcome which can be applied to all intracytoplasmic tumor markers.

Project description:IntroductionProgrammed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PDL-1) inhibitors are the newest class of approved drugs for advanced urothelial cancer (AdUC). This review aims to collate the evidence for their efficacy and safety in various treatment settings.MethodsExtensive search of databases was performed (updated May 2018) and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017081568). The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. STATA (v 12) and Revman 5.3.5 were used for data analysis.ResultsTen nonrandomized, open-label clinical trials were included in this review. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were used as second-line, stand-alone in eight trials and as first-line in cisplatin-ineligible in two trials. Heterogeneity was observed for study design, PDL-1 testing methods, cutoff criterias used and translational markers evaluated. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 18.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.1-21.2, n = 1785) with PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors in second-line settings as compared to 12.6% (95% CI 10.3-14.9, n = 736) with second-line chemotherapy and 23.7% (95% CI 19.9-27.4, n = 489) with PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was similar with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in both second- and first-line treatment settings (1.5-2.9 vs. 2.0-2.7 months and 7.9-18.2 vs. 15.9 months) and second-line chemotherapy (3.3-4.0 months and 7.4-8 months). Odds of achieving ORR was 0.10 (95% CI 0.03-0.31, n = 229) in the second-line, stand-alone setting with a combined positive score (CPS) cutoff of 25% and was 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.62, n = 265) with a CPS cut-off of 10% in first-line setting in the cisplatin-ineligible.ConclusionsPD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors appear to be promising in the treatment of AdUC and CPS may be a potentially reliable biomarker for predicting response but needs validation. Caution needs to be exercised until more data are available on imAEs and further studies are required to prove their worth as the standard of care.

Project description:BackgroundAn influx of systematic reviews (SRs) of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment with or without meta-analysis and with different methodological quality and inconsistent results have been published, confusing clinical decision making. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate and summarize the current evidence of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in the treatment of cancer.MethodsA comprehensive search of SRs, which included meta-analyses of PD-(L)1 inhibitors on cancer, was performed on eight databases with a cutoff date of 1 January 2022. Two authors independently identified SRs, extracted data, assessed the report quality according to the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, evaluated the methodological quality by the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), and appraised the quality of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).ResultsA total of 172 SRs with meta-analysis met the inclusion criteria. The report quality of included SRs was quite good, with 128 (74.42%) SRs of high quality and 44 (25.58%) of moderate quality. The methodological quality was alarming, as only one (0.58%) SR had high quality, five (2.91%) SRs had low quality, and the other 166 (96.51%) SRs had critically low quality. For GRADE, 38 (3.77%) outcomes had high-quality evidence, 288 (28.57%) moderate, 545 (54.07%) low, and 137 (13.59%) critically low-quality evidence. Current evidence indicated that treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitors were significantly effective in non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with PD-L1 expression level≥1%, whereas the evidence in gastroesophageal and colorectal tumors is still controversial. Monotherapy with PD-(L)1 inhibitors was associated with a lower frequency of any grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs). The incidence of any grade and high-grade AEs caused by PD-(L)1 inhibitors in combination with other therapies was no lower than the controls. However, PD-(L)1 inhibitors were associated with a higher frequency of any grade and high-grade immune-related AEs.ConclusionsPD-(L)1 inhibitors appeared to be effective and safe for cancer treatment, except for gastrointestinal tumors; however, the quality of the evidence is not convincing. Future studies should improve methodological quality and focus on the sequential trial analysis of subgroups and safety.Systematic review registrationhttp://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42020194260.

Dataset Information

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of programmed cell death 1/its ligand inhibitors plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Publications

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of programmed cell death 1/its ligand inhibitors plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets