Dataset Information

Geographic differences in lung cancer: focus on carcinogens, genetic predisposition, and molecular epidemiology.

ABSTRACT: Lung cancer poses a global health challenge and stands as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, its incidence, mortality, and characteristics are not uniform across all regions worldwide. Understanding the factors contributing to this diversity is crucial in a prevalent disease where most cases are diagnosed in advanced stages. Hence, prevention and early diagnosis emerge as the most efficient strategies to enhance outcomes. In Western societies, tobacco consumption constitutes the primary risk factor for lung cancer, accounting for up to 90% of cases. In other geographic locations, different significant factors play a fundamental role in disease development, such as individual genetic predisposition, or exposure to other carcinogens such as radon gas, environmental pollution, occupational exposures, or specific infectious diseases. Comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of lung cancer in recent decades has enabled us to distinguish different subtypes of lung cancer with distinct phenotypes, genotypes, immunogenicity, treatment responses, and survival rates. The ultimate goal is to prevent and individualize lung cancer management in each community and improve patient outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Laguna JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10919138 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Geographic differences in lung cancer: focus on carcinogens, genetic predisposition, and molecular epidemiology.

Laguna Juan Carlos JC García-Pardo Miguel M Alessi Joao J Barrios Carlos C Singh Navneet N Al-Shamsi Humaid O HO Loong Herbert H Ferriol Miquel M Recondo Gonzalo G Mezquita Laura L

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 20240306

Lung cancer poses a global health challenge and stands as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, its incidence, mortality, and characteristics are not uniform across all regions worldwide. Understanding the factors contributing to this diversity is crucial in a prevalent disease where most cases are diagnosed in advanced stages. Hence, prevention and early diagnosis emerge as the most efficient strategies to enhance outcomes. In Western societies, tobacco consumption cons ...[more]

PMID: 38455708

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in many countries. Although recent advances in targeted therapy against driver oncogenes have significantly improved patient outcome, cure of this disease is still exceptional. Although tobacco is a known cause of lung cancer, not all smokers develop lung cancer, and conversely many patients, especially Asian female patients with lung cancer, are lifetime never-smokers. Therefore, efforts to understand the basis for different susceptibilities to lung cancer among individuals with different genetic, biologic, ethnic, and social backgrounds are important to help develop effective preventive measures. Lung cancer in never-smokers has many different characteristics to lung cancer in smokers, such as adenocarcinoma predominance and high frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation yet low number of genetic changes. Epidemiologic studies suggest that East Asians are more susceptible to smoking-unrelated lung cancer but less susceptible to smoking-related lung cancer compared with Caucasians. Mutations in the EGFR gene are more common in Asian females and never-smokers. Our case-control study suggests that EGFR mutation occurs independent of smoking, and that the apparent low frequency of EGFR mutations in smokers may be the result of dilution by smoking-related lung cancer. The frequencies of three EGFR gene polymorphisms associated with increased protein expression are significantly different between East Asians and Caucasians, favoring lower protein expression in East Asians. Although these may be associated with preferred expression of the EGFR mutant allele, it is difficult to explain the frequent EGFR mutation in Asian patients. Genome wide association studies (GWAS) revealed several loci related to lung cancer susceptibility. In the future, GWAS may identify loci that are specifically related to EGFR-targeted carcinogenesis, leading to identification of carcinogens that induce EGFR mutations and effective prevention measures.

Project description:BackgroundDifferences in carcinogenesis and therapeutic efficacy according to ethnicity have been reported for lung cancer, and understanding differences in genetic mutation profiles among ethnicities is important for interpreting the results of clinical trials, preventing carcinogenesis, and individualizing treatment. However, no studies have focused on differences in mutation profiles among different ethnicities using large-scale genomic analysis data with detailed information on smoking history, the main cause of lung cancer.MethodsTo clarify the differences in genetic mutation profiles between Caucasian and Japanese subjects, we compared data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which mainly included Caucasians, with results from the Japan Molecular Epidemiology for lung cancer study, which is an epidemiological study only involving Japanese subjects. We divided the participants into four groups according to smoking status and performed comparative analysis by tissue type (lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer).ResultsIn patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the frequency of EGFR mutations was lower in Caucasian subjects than in Japanese subjects (14.6% vs. 51.1%), whereas the frequencies of mutations in other genes, namely KRAS (32.9% vs. 9.3%), TP53 (45.2% vs. 20.7%), BRAF (9.6% vs. 1.3%), PIK3CA (5.9% vs. 2.6%), KEAP1 (17.8% vs. 0.5%), NF1 (10.9% vs. 0.5%), STK11 (17.8% vs. 0.7%), RBM10 (8.7% vs. 0.1%), and MET (7.8% vs. 0.1%), were higher in Caucasian subjects. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma, TP53 (81.2% vs. 49.1%), PIK3CA (14.5% vs. 6.8%), KEAP1 (12.7% vs. 0.9%), and NFE2L2 mutations (15.8% vs. 13.6%) were more common in Caucasian subjects.ConclusionsEthnicity is an important and complex characteristic that must be recognized and considered, even in the era of precision medicine. We should collaborate to share data for different ethnicities and incorporate them into clinical practice and the design of global clinical studies. Carefully designed molecular epidemiological studies focusing on ethnic differences are warranted.

Project description:The availability of high-throughput genotyping and large collaborative clinical networks creating well-characterized patient populations with DNA repositories has facilitated genome-wide scans and candidate gene studies to identify susceptibility alleles for the development of interstitial lung disease. The association of pulmonary fibrosis with rare inherited disorders, and the variable susceptibility of inbred mouse strains to this disease indicate that pulmonary fibrosis is determined by genetic factors. Sarcoidosis represents a complex disease with racial and ethnic differences in disease prevalence, and evidence of familial clustering. Familial aggregation of sarcoidosis from 'A Case-Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis' (ACCESS) reveals a familial odds ratio (OR) of sarcoidosis of 5.8 (95% CI 2.1-15.9) for sibs and 3.8 (95% CI 1.2-11.3) for parents. Several HLA class II alleles have been associated with either increased or decreased risk of sarcoidosis, and results vary depending on study populations of different ethnicity. Genome-wide screening has conclusively identified linkage to chromosome 5q11and the development of sarcoidosis, and HLA genes and BTNL2 are susceptibility genes located in this region. Familial aggregation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) has been established by several groups, and a large US-based study suggests autosomal dominant inheritance with reduced penetrance; furthermore, cigarette smoking was associated with affection status among siblings (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-9.8, p = 0.01). Families demonstrate more than one type of IIP, suggesting various subtypes of IIP may share a common pathogenesis. Genome-wide linkage scans in familial interstitial pneumonia demonstrate linkage to chromosomes 4, 5 and 11. Candidate gene studies indicate that surfactant protein C and telomerase are susceptibility genes for the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Future challenges include determining how multiple susceptibility alleles interact with each other and environmental factors resulting in disease risk and multiple phenotypes, and determining the mechanism of action and cellular pathways involving susceptibility alleles. Further insight into these areas may lead to new therapeutic interventions.

Project description:IntroductionBRCA1 and BRCA2 germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) account for most of the 5-10% of breast cancer (BC) that is attributable to inherited genetic variants. BRCA1 GPVs are associated with the triple negative subtype, whereas BRCA2 GPVs are likely to result in higher grade, estrogen-receptor positive BCs. The contribution of other genes of high and moderate risk for BC has not been well defined and risk estimates to specific BC subtypes is lacking, especially for an admixed population like Brazilian.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the value of a multigene panel in detecting germline mutations in cancer-predisposing genes for Brazilian BC patients and its relation with molecular subtypes and the predominant molecular ancestry.Patients and methodsA total of 321 unrelated BC patients who fulfilled NCCN criteria for BRCA1/2 testing between 2016-2018 were investigated with a 94-genes panel. Molecular subtypes were retrieved from medical records and ancestry-specific variants were obtained from off-target reads obtained from the sequencing data.ResultsWe detected 83 GPVs in 81 patients (positivity rate of 25.2%). Among GPVs, 47% (39/83) were identified in high-risk BC genes (BRCA1/2, PALB2 and TP53) and 18% (15/83) in moderate-penetrance genes (ATM, CHEK2 and RAD51C). The remainder of the GPVs (35% - 29/83), were identified in lower-risk genes. As for the molecular subtypes, triple negative BC had a mutation frequency of 31.6% (25/79), with predominance in BRCA1 (12.6%; 10/79). Among the luminal subtypes, except Luminal B HER2-positive, 18.7% (29/155) had GPV with BRCA1/2 genes contributing 7.1% (11/155) and non-BRCA1/2 genes, 12.9% (20/155). For Luminal B HER2-positive subtype, 40% (16/40) had GPVs, with a predominance of ATM gene (15% - 6/40) and BRCA2 with only 2.5% (1/40). Finally, HER2-enriched subtype presented a mutation rate of 30.8% (4/13) with contribution of BRCA2 of 7.5% (1/13) and non-BRCA1/2 of 23% (3/13). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in 77.6% (249/321) of the patients and the number of VUS was increased in patients with Asian and Native American ancestry.ConclusionThe multigene panel contributed to identify GPVs in genes other than BRCA1/2, increasing the positivity of the genetic test from 9.6% (BRCA1/2) to 25.2% and, considering only the most clinically relevant BC predisposing genes, to 16.2%. These results indicate that women with clinical criteria for hereditary BC may benefit from a multigene panel testing, as it allows identifying GPVs in genes that directly impact the clinical management of these patients and family members.

Dataset Information

Geographic differences in lung cancer: focus on carcinogens, genetic predisposition, and molecular epidemiology.

Publications

Geographic differences in lung cancer: focus on carcinogens, genetic predisposition, and molecular epidemiology.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets