Project description:Proximal humerus fractures and injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are among the most common traumatic diseases of the upper extremity. Fractures of the proximal humerus occur most frequently in older people and are an indicator fracture of osteoporosis. While a large proportion of only slightly displaced fractures can be treated non-operatively, more complex fractures require surgical treatment. The choice of optimal treatment and the decision between joint-preserving surgery by means of osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic treatment is often a difficult decision in which both fracture morphology factors and individual factors should be taken into account. If endoprosthetic treatment is indicated, satisfactory long-term functional and clinical results have been achieved with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint occur primarily in young, athletic individuals. The common classification according to Rockwood divides the injury into 6 degrees of severity depending on the dislocation. This classification forms the basis for the decision on non-operative or surgical treatment. The indication for surgical treatment for higher-grade injuries is the subject of controversial debate in the latest literature. In chronic injuries, an autologous tendon transplant is also performed. Whereas in the past, treatment was often carried out using a hook plate, which was associated with complications, the gold standard today is minimally invasive treatment using Endobutton systems. This review provides an overview of the two injury patterns and discusses the various treatment options.
Project description:Proximal humerus fractures are common fractures that may occur after ground level falls or other traumatic events resulting in a direct injury to the shoulder. Depending on the fracture morphology and the age of the patient, anatomic reduction can vastly improve outcomes, especially in fracture patterns that involve the greater tuberosity. In this case example, we performed a minimally invasive, arthroscopic reduction and fixation of a proximal humerus fracture that involved significant displacement of the greater tuberosity. The technique employed is reproducible and avoids the morbidity of a large open incision while simultaneously providing compression of the fracture fragment for excellent healing potential.
Project description:BackgroundProximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in older adults. Because of the aging population, the incidence of these fractures and their impact will continue to grow. With advancement in treatment options for proximal humeral fractures, the aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in acute management of proximal humerus fractures to determine how definitive treatment has changed over the past decade in patients older than 65 years.MethodsUsing a commercially available database, patient records were queried from 2010 to 2019 for the incidence of proximal humerus fractures. For each individual year, data were queried to identify the incidence of closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP), hemiarthroplasty (HA), intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), or nonoperative treatment for acute proximal humeral fractures. A Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to determine significant changes in the trends of proximal humerus fracture management. Logistic regression analyses were performed to generate odds ratios (OR) with associated 95% confidence intervals comparing each individual procedure performed in 2019 to 2010.ResultsA total of 160,836 patients at least 65 years of age and older were diagnosed with a proximal humerus fracture. Of this total, 28,503 (17.72%) patients received operative treatment and 132,333 (82.28%) received nonoperative treatment. From 2010 to 2019, operative treatment trends of proximal humerus fractures changed such that CRPP decreased by 60.0%, HA decreased by 81.4%, IMN decreased by 81.9%, ORIF decreased by 25.7%, TSA decreased by 80.5%, and RSA increased by 1841.4% (all P < .0001). Overall, nonsurgical management increased from 80% to 85% during the examined study period (P < .0001). Patients in 2019 were significantly more likely to receive an RSA (OR 22.65) and were significantly less likely to receive CRPP (OR 0.45), HA (OR 0.20), IMN (OR 0.20), ORIF (OR 0.82), and TSA (OR 0.22) than patients in 2010. In addition, patients in 2019 were significantly more likely to receive nonoperative treatment than patients in 2010 (OR 1.10).ConclusionOver the past decade, most of older adults who sustain proximal humerus fractures continue to receive nonoperative treatment. Although CRPP, IMN, HA, ORIF, and TSA have decreased, RSA has recently become more widely utilized, which is consistent with what has been noted in other countries. Continued examination of the mid- and long-term outcomes of the increasing percentages in RSA should be performed in this population.
Project description:Clavicle fracture nonunion can lead to persistent pain and loss of shoulder function. Distal clavicle fractures have the greatest risk of nonunion and are often treated surgically. Bone grafting plays a vital role in the treatment of distal clavicle nonunion. Although multiple options for bone graft exist, the iliac crest has long been considered the gold standard for harvest. Despite its extensive use, multiple complications have been associated with iliac crest bone graft harvest. We advocate a surgical technique for arthroscopic bone graft harvest from the proximal humerus with open reduction and internal fixation of an ipsilateral distal clavicle nonunion.
Project description:Operative management of a coracoid process fracture is indicated in case of painful nonunion, displacement of more than 1 cm, or multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. Several techniques have been described with open reduction of the fracture and internal fixation using cortical screws with or without additional fixation of the acromioclavicular joint. This Technical Note aims to introduce an alternative safe, minimally invasive method for arthroscopic fixation of a coracoid fracture with simultaneously reduction of the acromioclavicular joint. The described arthroscopic technique might be helpful for shoulder surgeons who want to fix the coracoid process while avoiding the disadvantages of an open approach.
Project description:Introduction and importanceCombined proximal humerus fracture and glenohumeral dislocation in the pediatric population is extremely rare, with only few reports of such cases been reported. We review all cases of combined proximal humerus fracture and glenohumeral dislocation in the pediatric population and present a case of left proximal humerus fracture dislocation in a healthy 5-year-old girl.Case presentationA 5-year-old girl fell from 2 m height and landed on her left shoulder where she started to complain from severe left shoulder pain, inability to move her left shoulder and bruising. She was diagnosed at our facility to have left proximal humerus fracture combined with glenohumeral dislocation and was treated with open reduction, K-wires fixation and immobilization in a shoulder cast.Clinical discussionTraumatic proximal humeral fracture associated with glenohumeral dislocation is a rare presentation in pediatric age group. This type of fracture is usually managed by closed reduction and casting, with a minority being managed with open reduction. Indications for surgical intervention are open fractures, severely displaced fractures, fractures that are associated with neurovascular compromise, or irreducible fracture due to soft tissue obstacles.ConclusionsA high index of suspicion is required to diagnose such injuries along with appropriate radiographic evaluation. We recommend open reduction with K-wires fixation for irreducible combined proximal humeral fracture and glenohumeral dislocation.
Project description:BackgroundAs the aging population expands, proximal humerus fractures have become more prevalent. This study aimed to evaluate acute management of proximal humerus fractures in women and men older than the age of 50 years to determine how gender and age have affected definitive treatment selection over the last decade.MethodsPatient records were retrospectively reviewed from a commercially available database, PearlDiver, to identify treatments for proximal humerus fractures between 2010 and 2019. Data were separated by age into two cohorts, patients aged 50-64 years and those aged 65 years and older before stratification by gender. Within each cohort, groups were matched with respect to age, region, and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine which gender was associated with a higher risk of undergoing operative treatment, which gender was associated with a higher risk of receiving arthroplasty, and which of the individual surgical operations were more likely given the patient's gender and age.ResultsIn the 50- to 64-year-old cohort, men were less likely to be treated operatively than women (odds ratio [OR]: 0.90). However, men in this cohort had a 31% higher likelihood of receiving an arthroplasty procedure than women when given operative treatment. Specifically, men aged 50 to 64 years were more likely to receive hemiarthroplasty (OR: 1.48) and intramedullary nailing (OR: 1.19) and were less likely to have open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (OR: 0.71). In the 65 years and older cohort, there was no relationship between gender and the likelihood of operative treatment for a proximal humerus fracture. Men older than 65 years had a 29% lower likelihood of receiving an arthroplasty type procedure than women older than 65 years. In addition, men older than 65 years were more likely to receive ORIF (OR: 1.14) and intramedullary nailing (OR: 1.43) and less likely to receive hemiarthroplasty (OR: 0.86) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (OR: 0.66) than similarly aged women.ConclusionBoth age and gender have an association with the definitive treatment patients received for proximal humerus fractures over the last decade. Women younger than 65 years of age were more likely to undergo operative treatment, although once older than 65 years, there was no influence of gender on operative treatment. Men younger than 65 years were more likely to receive arthroplasty and women, more likely to undergo ORIF; however, as patients reached the age of 65 years and older, this finding was reversed such that women were more likely to receive arthroplasty and men, ORIF. Further exploration into these differences could improve decision-making between surgeons and patients.
Project description:Proximal humerus fracture fixation may be complicated by persistent postsurgical stiffness or implant-related problems. Arthroscopic plate removal is a cosmetic and functionally beneficial procedure; however, the procedure is technically difficult in the presence of severe subdeltoid scarring. The technique described here shows an arthroscopic subdeltoid adhesiolysis and proximal humerus plate removal using systematic access to 5 regions of screw positions on the plate. After initial glenohumeral adhesiolysis, a thorough subacromial and subdeltoid bursectomy is performed. The axillary nerve and deltoid are retracted via an anterosuperolateral portal, and a posterolateral portal is used for panoramic viewing along the plate length. Lateral portals are placed above and below the axillary nerve, and these are used for screw removal. Finally, the plate is removed via a 1-inch incision along the previous surgical scar. The technique is cosmetic and minimally invasive, and early rehabilitation restores range of motion and strength. Technical tips for safe dissection in the scarred subdeltoid space and guidelines for protection of neurovascular structures are presented.
Project description:IntroductionIn locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, the calcar is an important anchor point for screws providing much-needed medial column support. Most locking plate implants utilize a fixed-trajectory locking screw to achieve this goal. Consequently, adjustments of plate location to account for patient-specific anatomy may result in a screw position outside of the calcar. To date, little is known about the consequences of "missing" the calcar during plate positioning. This study sought to characterize the biomechanics associated with proximal and distal placement of locking plates in a two-part fracture model.Materials and methodsThis experiment was performed twice, first with elderly cadaveric specimens and again with osteoporotic sawbones. Two-part fractures were simulated and specimens were divided to represent proximal, neutral, and distal plate placements. Non-destructive torsional and axial compression tests were performed prior to an axial fatigue test and a ramp to failure. Torsional stiffness, axial stiffness, humeral head displacement and stiffness during fatigue testing, and ultimate load were compared between groups.ResultsCadavers: Proximal implant placement led to trends of decreased mechanical properties, but there were no significant differences found between groups. Sawbones: Distal placement increased torsional stiffness in both directions (p = 0.003, p = 0.034) and axial stiffness (p = 0.018) when compared to proximal placement. Distal placement also increased torsional stiffness in external rotation (p = 0.020), increased axial stiffness (p = 0.024), decreased humeral head displacement during fatigue testing, and increased stiffness during fatigue testing when compared to neutral placement.DiscussionThe distal and neutral groups had similar mechanical properties in many cadaveric comparisons while the proximal group trended towards decreased construct stiffness.Resultsfrom the Sawbones model were more definitive and provided further evidence that proximal calcar screw placements are undesirable and distal implant placement may provide improved construct stability.ConclusionSuccessful proximal humerus fracture reconstruction is inherent upon anatomic fracture reduction coupled with medial column support. Results from this experiment suggest that missing the calcar proximally is deleterious to fixation strength, while it is safe, and perhaps even desirable, to aim slightly distal to the intended target.
Project description:Little is known about survival after proximal humerus fracture. In this manuscript, we found the mortality to be high (almost four times higher than in age- and sex-matched controls). While frailty hip fracture has gained attention, we hope our manuscript will shed light on frailty proximal humerus fracture patients.IntroductionProximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common and occur mostly after the 6th decade of life. While mortality following PHF has been reported previously, mortality data after longer follow-up on a national level is lacking.MethodsWe obtained data from the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register (SHDR), on all adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of PHF (S42.2, S42.20, or S42.21) for the period between 2001 and 2016. We used the Swedish Cause of Death Register (SCDR) to investigate mortality in the fracture cohort. We compared the mortality of fracture patients with age- and sex-matched population-based mortality data obtained from Statistics Sweden.ResultsA total of 147 692 PHF patients were identified, with a male to female ratio of 1:3. The mean age was 69 years (range, 18 to 111). Most patients were treated non-surgically (n = 126,487, 86%). The crude mortality rate was 2.2% at 1 month, 4.1% at 3 months, 8.5% at 12 months, and 24% at 48 months after sustaining a PHF. Mortality increased with age; however, the standardized mortality rate (SMR) was highest among young patients. SMR was 5.4 in the 18- to 39-year age group, 3.9 in the 40- to 64-year age group, 1.8 in the 65-79-year age group, and 1.2 in the ≥ 80-year-old population. The age-adjusted SMR was 3.9 in the whole adult PHF population.ConclusionThe mortality rate and SMR suggest that PHF patients are heterogeneous. Some older PHF patients may benefit from specialized care (e.g., orthogeriatric), and this should be evaluated in future studies.