Advances in the treatment of BRAF-mutant low-grade glioma with MAPK inhibitors.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Houghton PJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10998999 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Advances in the treatment of BRAF-mutant low-grade glioma with MAPK inhibitors.
Translational pediatrics 20240318 3
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe prognosis for patients with pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is poor despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Objective responses to targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors have been reported in some patients with recurrent BRAF-mutant pHGG but are rarely sustained.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG treated with off-label BRAF +/- MEK inhibitors as part of their initial therapy.ResultsNineteen patients were identified, with a median age of 11.7 years (range, 2.3-21.4). Histologic diagnoses included HGG (n = 6), glioblastoma (n = 3), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 4), diffuse midline glioma (n = 3), high-grade neuroepithelial tumor (n = 1), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 1), and anaplastic astroblastoma (n = 1). Recurrent concomitant oncogenic alterations included CDKN2A/B loss, H3 K27M, as well as mutations in ATRX, EGFR, and TERT. Eight patients received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Eleven patients received combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Most patients tolerated long-term treatment well with no grade 4-5 toxicities. Objective and durable imaging responses were seen in the majority of patients with measurable disease. At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 0.3-6.5), three-year progression-free and overall survival for the cohort were 65% and 82%, respectively, and superior to a historical control cohort of BRAF-mutant pHGG patients treated with conventional therapies.ConclusionsUpfront targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG is feasible and effective, with superior clinical outcomes compared to historical data. This promising treatment paradigm is currently being evaluated prospectively in the Children's Oncology Group ACNS1723 clinical trial.
| S-EPMC9629451 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer. Melanoma is usually curable with surgery if detected early, however, treatment options for patients with metastatic melanoma are limited and the five-year survival rate for metastatic melanoma had been 15-20% before the advent of immunotherapy. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased long-term survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma to as high as 50% although individual response can vary greatly. A mutation within the MAPK pathway leads to uncontrollable growth and ultimately develops into cancer. The most common driver mutation that leads to this characteristic overactivation in the MAPK pathway is the B-RAF mutation. Current combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes include dabrafenib with trametinib, vemurafenib with cobimetinib or encorafenib with binimetinib. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has met challenges as patient responses began to drop due to the development of resistance to these inhibitors which paved the way for development of immunotherapies and other small molecule inhibitor approaches to address this. Resistance to these inhibitors continues to push the need to expand our understanding of novel mechanisms of resistance associated with treatment therapies. This review focuses on the current landscape of how resistance occurs with the chronic use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma and progress made in the fields of immunotherapies and other small molecules when used alone or in combination with BRAF and MEK inhibitors to delay or circumvent the onset of resistance for patients with stage III/IV BRAF mutant melanoma.
| S-EPMC7072236 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10710660 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are slow-growing tumors in the central nervous system (CNS). Patients characteristically show the onset of seizures or neurological deficits due to the predominant LGG location in high-functional brain areas. As a molecular hallmark, LGGs display mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) enzymes, resulting in an altered cellular energy metabolism and the production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Despite the remarkable progress in improving the extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, LGG remains incurable, and secondary malignant transformation is often observed. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. In recent years, immunotherapeutic strategies have led to tremendous success in various cancer types, but the effect of immunotherapy against glioma has been limited due to several challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity and the immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, recent preclinical and clinical findings from immunotherapy trials are encouraging and offer a glimmer of hope for treating IDH-mutant LGG patients. Here, we aim to review the lessons learned from trials involving vaccines, T-cell therapies, and IDH-mutant inhibitors and discuss future approaches to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies in IDH-mutant LGG.
| S-EPMC10378701 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIsocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas.MethodsIn a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed.ResultsA total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo.ConclusionsIn patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.).
| S-EPMC11445763 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Background High-grade gliomas (HGG) with BRAFV600E mutation represent a unique subset of central nervous system tumors. Targeted therapies including BRAF and MEK inhibitors are now being explored as possible new treatment options. Methods We report an 18-year-old female with a grade 3 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma treated upfront with dabrafenib and trametinib. We also conducted a systematic literature review of patients with HGG and BRAFV600E mutations treated with BRAF inhibitors. Results Despite local recurrences resected surgically, the patient has been on dabrafenib and trametinib for more than 54 months. Thirty-two patients with HGG and BRAFV600E mutations treated with BRAF inhibitors were retrieved through our systematic review of the literature. Only 1 young patient with an anaplastic ganglioglioma was treated upfront with a BRAF inhibitor with a curative intent. Best response reported with radiation therapy and systemic therapy was a stable disease (SD) for 18 patients (56.3%) and progressive disease (PD) for 9 patients (28.1%). Responses to treatment regimens that included BRAF inhibitors were reported in 31 patients and included 4 complete responses (12.9%), 23 partial responses (74.2%), 2 SDs (6.5%), and 2 PDs (6.5%). Conclusions Our patient had durable disease control with dabrafenib and trametinib. Given favorable responses reported in patients with HGG treated with BRAF inhibitors, we believe that upfront targeted therapy is a possible treatment approach that should be studied in the context of a clinical trial.
| S-EPMC9772816 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are commonly used in clinical oncology. However, with the exception of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), MAPK pathway inhibitors such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are associated with dose-limiting papulopustular eruptions. Interestingly, patients treated with a combination of systemic BRAFi and MEKi experience less skin toxicities than patients on monotherapy BRAFi or MEKi. The reduction in cutaneous adverse events with combination therapy is thought to be due to a paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway by BRAFi in keratinocytes carrying wildtype BRAF. Although treatment options for EGFRi- or MEKi-induced papulopustular eruptions exist, many patients still experience dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation of EGFRi or MEKi. With the goal of activating MAPK signaling in the skin via BRAFi while minimizing systemic risks, we propose topical BRAFi therapy for the treatment and prevention of papulopustular eruptions due to MAPK pathway inhibitors. If effective, patients will be able to tolerate higher doses of MAPK pathway inhibitors, stay on treatment longer, and achieve better therapeutic outcomes overall.
| S-EPMC7680264 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Low-grade glioma (LGG) is the most common brain tumor in children and has excellent long-term survival. With an excellent survival rate, the choice of treatment involves careful consideration of minimizing late toxicity from surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy can be used as monotherapy or in combination, providing different therapeutic ratios and complications. As a result, establishing the selection of ideal therapies has been a controversial area, presenting challenges. Recent advances in understanding molecular characteristics of pediatric LGG affect classification and treatment approaches. This review aims to overview recent developments in medical treatment in pediatric LGG.
| S-EPMC9650116 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The characterization of the MAPK signaling pathway has led to the development of multiple promising targeted therapy options for a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma. The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors represents an FDA-approved standard of care in patients with metastatic and resected BRAF-mutated melanoma. There are currently three FDA-approved BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations for the treatment of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Although there have been significant advances in the field of targeted therapy, further exploration of new targets within the MAPK pathway will strengthen therapeutic options for patients. Important clinical and translational research focuses on mechanisms of resistance, predictive biomarkers, and challenging patient populations such as those with brain metastases or resected melanoma.
| S-EPMC6774830 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Targeted BRAF inhibition (BRAFi) and combined BRAF and MEK inhibition (BRAFi and MEKi) therapies have markedly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these treatments is often countered by the acquisition of drug resistance. Here we investigated the molecular mechanisms that underlie acquired resistance to BRAFi and to the combined therapy. Consistent with previous studies, we show that resistance to BRAFi is mediated by ERK pathway reactivation. Resistance to the combined therapy, however, is mediated by mechanisms independent of reactivation of ERK in many resistant cell lines and clinical samples. p21-activated kinases (PAKs) become activated in cells with acquired drug resistance and have a pivotal role in mediating resistance. Our screening, using a reverse-phase protein array, revealed distinct mechanisms by which PAKs mediate resistance to BRAFi and the combined therapy. In BRAFi-resistant cells, PAKs phosphorylate CRAF and MEK to reactivate ERK. In cells that are resistant to the combined therapy, PAKs regulate JNK and β-catenin phosphorylation and mTOR pathway activation, and inhibit apoptosis, thereby bypassing ERK. Together, our results provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying acquired drug resistance to current targeted therapies, and may help to direct novel drug development efforts to overcome acquired drug resistance.
| S-EPMC5891348 | biostudies-literature