Dataset Information

Detecting QT prolongation from a single-lead ECG with deep learning.

ABSTRACT: For a number of antiarrhythmics, drug loading requires a 3-day hospitalization with continuous monitoring for QT-prolongation. Automated QT monitoring with wearable ECG monitors would enable out-of-hospital care. We therefore develop a deep learning model that infers QT intervals from ECG Lead-I-the lead that is often available in ambulatory ECG monitors-and use this model to detect clinically meaningful QT-prolongation episodes during Dofetilide drug loading. QTNet-a deep neural network that infers QT intervals from Lead-I ECG-was trained using over 3 million ECGs from 653 thousand patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital and tested on an internal-test set consisting of 633 thousand ECGs from 135 thousand patients. QTNet is further evaluated on an external-validation set containing 3.1 million ECGs from 667 thousand patients at another healthcare institution. On both evaluations, the model achieves mean absolute errors of 12.63ms (internal-test) and 12.30ms (external-validation) for estimating absolute QT intervals. The associated Pearson correlation coefficients are 0.91 (internal-test) and 0.92 (external-validation). Finally, QTNet was used to detect Dofetilide-induced QT prolongation in a publicly available database (ECGRDVQ-dataset) containing ECGs from subjects enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs. QTNet detects Dofetilide-induced QTc prolongation with 87% sensitivity and 77% specificity. The negative predictive value of the model is greater than 95% when the pre-test probability of drug-induced QTc prolongation is below 25%. These results show that drug-induced QT prolongation risk can be tracked from ECG Lead-I using deep learning.

SUBMITTER: Alam R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11198807 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Detecting QT prolongation from a single-lead ECG with deep learning.

Alam Ridwan R Aguirre Aaron A Stultz Collin M CM

PLOS digital health 20240625 6

For a number of antiarrhythmics, drug loading requires a 3-day hospitalization with continuous monitoring for QT-prolongation. Automated QT monitoring with wearable ECG monitors would enable out-of-hospital care. We therefore develop a deep learning model that infers QT intervals from ECG Lead-I-the lead that is often available in ambulatory ECG monitors-and use this model to detect clinically meaningful QT-prolongation episodes during Dofetilide drug loading. QTNet-a deep neural network that in ...[more]

PMID: 38917157

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCongenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a rare heart disease caused by various underlying mutations. Most general cardiologists do not routinely see patients with congenital LQTS and may not always recognize the accompanying ECG features. In addition, a proportion of disease carriers do not display obvious abnormalities on their ECG. Combined, this can cause underdiagnosing of this potentially life-threatening disease.MethodsThis study presents 1D convolutional neural network models trained to identify genotype positive LQTS patients from electrocardiogram as input. The deep learning (DL) models were trained with a large 10-s 12-lead ECGs dataset provided by Amsterdam UMC and externally validated with a dataset provided by University Hospital Leuven. The Amsterdam dataset included ECGs from 10000 controls, 172 LQTS1, 214 LQTS2, and 72 LQTS3 patients. The Leuven dataset included ECGs from 2200 controls, 32 LQTS1, and 80 LQTS2 patients. The performance of the DL models was compared with conventional QTc measurement and with that of an international expert in congenital LQTS (A.A.M.W). Lastly, an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) technique was used to better understand the prediction models.ResultsOverall, the best performing DL models, across 5-fold cross-validation, achieved on average a sensitivity of 84 ± 2%, 90 ± 2% and 87 ± 6%, specificity of 96 ± 2%, 95 ± 1%, and 92 ± 4%, and AUC of 0.90 ± 0.01, 0.92 ± 0.02, and 0.89 ± 0.03, for LQTS 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The DL models were also shown to perform better than conventional QTc measurements in detecting LQTS patients. Furthermore, the performances held up when the DL models were validated on a novel external cohort and outperformed the expert cardiologist in terms of specificity, while in terms of sensitivity, the DL models and the expert cardiologist in LQTS performed the same. Finally, the explainable AI technique identified the onset of the QRS complex as the most informative region to classify LQTS from non-LQTS patients, a feature previously not associated with this disease.ConclusionsThis study suggests that DL models can potentially be used to aid cardiologists in diagnosing LQTS. Furthermore, explainable DL models can be used to possibly identify new features for LQTS on the ECG, thus increasing our understanding of this syndrome.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of QT measurement in a smartphone-operated, single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) device (AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L).DesignCross-sectional, within-patient diagnostic validation study.Setting/participantsPatients underwent a 12-lead ECG (12L-ECG) for any non-acute indication in primary care, April 2017-July 2018.InterventionSimultaneous recording of 1L-ECGs and 12L-ECGs with blinded manual QT assessment. OUTCOMES OF INTEREST: (1) Difference in QT interval in milliseconds (ms) between the devices; (2) measurement agreement between the devices (excellent agreement <20 ms and clinically acceptable agreement <40 ms absolute difference); (3) sensitivity and specificity for detection of extreme QTc (short (≤340 ms) or long (≥480 ms)), on 1L-ECGs versus 12L-ECGs as reference standard. In case of significant discrepancy between lead I/II of 12L-ECGs and 1L-ECGs, we developed a correction tool by adding the difference between QT measurements of 12L-ECG and 1L-ECGs.Results250 ECGs of 125 patients were included. The mean QTc interval, using Bazett's formula (QTcB), was 393±25 ms (mean±SD) in 1L-ECGs and 392±27 ms in lead I of 12L-ECGs, a mean difference of 1±21 ms, which was not statistically different (paired t-test (p=0.51) and Bland Altman method (p=0.23)). In terms of agreement between 1L-ECGs and lead I, QTcB had excellent agreement in 66.9% and clinically acceptable agreement in 93.4% of observations. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting extreme QTc were 0% and 99.2%, respectively. The comparison of 1L-ECG QTcB with lead II of 12L-ECGs showed a significant difference (p=<0.01), but when using a correction factor (+9 ms) this difference was cancelled (paired t-test (p=0.43) or Bland Altman test (p=0.57)). Moreover, it led to improved rates of excellent (71.3%) and clinically acceptable (94.3%) agreement.ConclusionSmartphone-operated 1L-ECGs can be used to accurately measure the QTc interval compared with simultaneously obtained 12L-ECGs in a primary care population. This may provide an opportunity for monitoring the effects of potential QTc-prolonging medications.

Project description:ImportanceCongenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is associated with syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death. Half of patients with LQTS have a normal or borderline-normal QT interval despite LQTS often being detected by QT prolongation on resting electrocardiography (ECG).ObjectiveTo develop a deep learning-based neural network for identification of LQTS and differentiation of genotypes (LQTS1 and LQTS2) using 12-lead ECG.Design, setting, and participantsThis diagnostic accuracy study used ECGs from patients with suspected inherited arrhythmia enrolled in the Hearts in Rhythm Organization Registry (HiRO) from August 2012 to December 2021. The internal dataset was derived at 2 sites and an external validation dataset at 4 sites within the HiRO Registry; an additional cross-sectional validation dataset was from the Montreal Heart Institute. The cohort with LQTS included probands and relatives with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in KCNQ1 or KCNH2 genes with normal or prolonged corrected QT (QTc) intervals.ExposuresConvolutional neural network (CNN) discrimination between LQTS1, LQTS2, and negative genetic test results.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcomes were area under the curve (AUC), F1 scores, and sensitivity for detecting LQTS and differentiating genotypes using a CNN method compared with QTc-based detection.ResultsA total of 4521 ECGs from 990 patients (mean [SD] age, 42 [18] years; 589 [59.5%] female) were analyzed. External validation within the national registry (101 patients) demonstrated the CNN's high diagnostic capacity for LQTS detection (AUC, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96) and genotype differentiation (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96). This surpassed expert-measured QTc intervals in detecting LQTS (F1 score, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78-0.90] vs 0.22 [95% CI, 0.13-0.31]; sensitivity, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94] vs 0.36 [95% CI, 0.23-0.47]), including in patients with normal or borderline QTc intervals (F1 score, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40-1.00]; sensitivity, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.53-0.95]). In further validation in a cross-sectional cohort (406 patients) of high-risk patients and genotype-negative controls, the CNN detected LQTS with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.80-0.85), which was better than QTc interval-based detection (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.78).Conclusions and relevanceThe deep learning model improved detection of congenital LQTS from resting ECGs and allowed for differentiation between the 2 most common genetic subtypes. Broader validation over an unselected general population may support application of this model to patients with suspected LQTS.

Dataset Information

Detecting QT prolongation from a single-lead ECG with deep learning.

Publications

Detecting QT prolongation from a single-lead ECG with deep learning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets