Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Manual QT interval measurement with a smartphone-operated single-lead ECG versus 12-lead ECG: a within-patient diagnostic validation study in primary care


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the accuracy of QT measurement in a smartphone-operated, single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) device (AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L).

Design

Cross-sectional, within-patient diagnostic validation study.

Setting/participants

Patients underwent a 12-lead ECG (12L-ECG) for any non-acute indication in primary care, April 2017–July 2018.

Intervention

Simultaneous recording of 1L-ECGs and 12L-ECGs with blinded manual QT assessment.

Outcomes of interest

(1) Difference in QT interval in milliseconds (ms) between the devices; (2) measurement agreement between the devices (excellent agreement <20 ms and clinically acceptable agreement <40 ms absolute difference); (3) sensitivity and specificity for detection of extreme QTc (short (≤340 ms) or long (≥480 ms)), on 1L-ECGs versus 12L-ECGs as reference standard. In case of significant discrepancy between lead I/II of 12L-ECGs and 1L-ECGs, we developed a correction tool by adding the difference between QT measurements of 12L-ECG and 1L-ECGs.

Results

250 ECGs of 125 patients were included. The mean QTc interval, using Bazett’s formula (QTcB), was 393±25 ms (mean±SD) in 1L-ECGs and 392±27 ms in lead I of 12L-ECGs, a mean difference of 1±21 ms, which was not statistically different (paired t-test (p=0.51) and Bland Altman method (p=0.23)). In terms of agreement between 1L-ECGs and lead I, QTcB had excellent agreement in 66.9% and clinically acceptable agreement in 93.4% of observations. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting extreme QTc were 0% and 99.2%, respectively. The comparison of 1L-ECG QTcB with lead II of 12L-ECGs showed a significant difference (p=<0.01), but when using a correction factor (+9 ms) this difference was cancelled (paired t-test (p=0.43) or Bland Altman test (p=0.57)). Moreover, it led to improved rates of excellent (71.3%) and clinically acceptable (94.3%) agreement.

Conclusion

Smartphone-operated 1L-ECGs can be used to accurately measure the QTc interval compared with simultaneously obtained 12L-ECGs in a primary care population. This may provide an opportunity for monitoring the effects of potential QTc-prolonging medications.

SUBMITTER: Beers L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8572408 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8411681 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5595951 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11198807 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8144193 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8195254 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6932549 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3247646 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7451551 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7145824 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6458066 | biostudies-literature