Exploratory methods for checking quality of microarray data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lee EK
PROVIDER: S-EPMC1896057 | biostudies-literature | 2007 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Exploratory methods for checking quality of microarray data.
Lee Eun-Kyung EK Park Taesung T
Bioinformation 20070410 10
In microarray experiments many undesirable systematic variations are commonly observed. Often investigators analyzing microarray data need to make subjective decisions about the quality of the experiment, by examining its chip image and a simple scatter plot. Thus, a more rigorous but simple method is desirable to determine the quality of microarray data. We propose two exploratory methods to investigate the quality of microarray experiments with replicated chips. The first method is based on co ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND: Statistical methods for ranking differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from gene expression data should be evaluated with regard to high sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. In our previous studies, we evaluated eight gene ranking methods applied to only Affymetrix GeneChip data. A more general evaluation that also includes other microarray platforms, such as the Agilent or Illumina systems, is desirable for determining which methods are suitable for each platform and which method has better inter-platform reproducibility. RESULTS: We compared the eight gene ranking methods using the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) datasets produced by five manufacturers: Affymetrix, Applied Biosystems, Agilent, GE Healthcare, and Illumina. The area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure for both sensitivity and specificity. Although the highest AUC values can vary with the definition of "true" DEGs, the best methods were, in most cases, either the weighted average difference (WAD), rank products (RP), or intensity-based moderated t statistic (ibmT). The percentages of overlapping genes (POGs) across different test sites were mainly evaluated as a measure for both intra- and inter-platform reproducibility. The POG values for WAD were the highest overall, irrespective of the choice of microarray platform. The high intra- and inter-platform reproducibility of WAD was also observed at a higher biological function level. CONCLUSION: These results for the five microarray platforms were consistent with our previous ones based on 36 real experimental datasets measured using the Affymetrix platform. Thus, recommendations made using the MAQC benchmark data might be universally applicable.
| S-EPMC3128035 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Little consideration has been given to the effect of different segmentation methods on the variability of data derived from microarray images. Previous work has suggested that the significant source of variability from microarray image analysis is from estimation of local background. In this study, we used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models to investigate the effect of methods of segmentation on the precision of measurements obtained from replicate microarray experiments. We used four different methods of spot segmentation (adaptive, fixed circle, histogram and GenePix) to analyse a total number of 156 172 spots from 12 microarray experiments. Using a two-way ANOVA model and the coefficient of repeatability, we show that the method of segmentation significantly affects the precision of the microarray data. The histogram method gave the lowest variability across replicate spots compared to other methods, and had the lowest pixel-to-pixel variability within spots. This effect on precision was independent of background subtraction. We show that these findings have direct, practical implications as the variability in precision between the four methods resulted in different numbers of genes being identified as differentially expressed. Segmentation method is an important source of variability in microarray data that directly affects precision and the identification of differentially expressed genes.
| S-EPMC390347 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The quality of data used for QSAR model derivation is extremely important as it strongly affects the final robustness and predictive power of the model. Ambiguous or wrong structures need to be carefully checked, because they lead to errors in calculation of descriptors, hence leading to meaningless results. The increasing amounts of data, however, have often made it hard to check of very large databases manually. In the light of this, we designed and implemented a semi-automated workflow integrating structural data retrieval from several web-based databases, automated comparison of these data, chemical structure cleaning, selection and standardization of data into a consistent, ready-to-use format that can be employed for modeling. The workflow integrates best practices for data curation that have been suggested in the recent literature. The workflow has been implemented with the freely available KNIME software and is freely available to the cheminformatics community for improvement and application to a broad range of chemical datasets.
| S-EPMC6503381 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundGene set analysis is considered to be a way of improving our biological interpretation of the observed expression patterns. This paper describes different methods applied to analyse expression data from a chicken DNA microarray dataset.ResultsApplying different gene set analyses to the chicken expression data led to different ranking of the Gene Ontology terms tested. A method for prediction of possible annotations was applied.ConclusionBiological interpretation based on gene set analyses dependent on the statistical method used. Methods for predicting the possible annotations for genes with unknown function from the expression data at hand could be useful, but our results indicate that careful validation of the predictions is needed.
| S-EPMC2712751 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Issues implicit in a multicenter microarray study are protocol standardization and monitoring center adherence to established protocols. This study explored the effects of submitting center and sample preservation method on the quality of isolated RNA. In addition, the effects of sample preservation method and laboratory on microarray quality were also examined. Herein we evaluated the contribution of specific technical factors [center, laboratory, and preservation method (frozen/RNAlater)] on quality of isolated RNA, cRNA synthesis products, and reproducibility of gene expression microarray data for independent biologic samples collected in a multicenter microarray study. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for differences owing to submitting center on isolated RNA quality. Mixed effects analysis of variance was used in assessing the impact of laboratory and preservation method on gene expression values for the 12 samples hybridized at 2 independent laboratories (24 GeneChips). One center was found to be in violation of the tissue handling protocol. No significant effect was noted owing to preservation method, which ensured that our tissue handling protocols are working properly. There was a significant laboratory effect with respect to cRNA yield, though this effect did not impact sample quality. We conclude that use of consistent protocols for sample collection, RNA extraction, cDNA/cRNA synthesis, labeling, hybridization, platform, image acquisition, normalization, and expression summaries can yield consistent expression values. Moreover, evaluation of sample quality at various steps in the data acquisition process is an important component of a multicenter study to ensure all participating centers adhere to established protocols.
| S-EPMC3738008 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Public sharing of scientific data has assumed greater importance in the omics era. Transparency is necessary for confirmation and validation, and multiple examiners aid in extracting maximal value from large data sets. Accordingly, database submission and provision of the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)(3) are required by most journals as a prerequisite for review or acceptance. METHODS:In this study, the level of data submission and MIAME compliance was reviewed for 127 articles that included microarray-based microRNA (miRNA) profiling and were published from July 2011 through April 2012 in the journals that published the largest number of such articles--PLOS ONE, the Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, and Oncogene--along with articles from 9 other journals, including Clinical Chemistry, that published smaller numbers of array-based articles. RESULTS:Overall, data submission was reported at publication for <40% of all articles, and almost 75% of articles were MIAME noncompliant. On average, articles that included full data submission scored significantly higher on a quality metric than articles with limited or no data submission, and studies with adequate description of methods disproportionately included larger numbers of experimental repeats. Finally, for several articles that were not MIAME compliant, data reanalysis revealed less than complete support for the published conclusions, in 1 case leading to retraction. CONCLUSIONS:These findings buttress the hypothesis that reluctance to share data is associated with low study quality and suggest that most miRNA array investigations are underpowered and/or potentially compromised by a lack of appropriate reporting and data submission.
| S-EPMC4037921 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Semiparametric transformation models provide a very general framework for studying the effects of (possibly time-dependent) covariates on survival time and recurrent event times. Assessing the adequacy of these models is an important task because model misspecification affects the validity of inference and the accuracy of prediction. In this paper, we introduce appropriate time-dependent residuals for these models and consider the cumulative sums of the residuals. Under the assumed model, the cumulative sum processes converge weakly to zero-mean Gaussian processes whose distributions can be approximated through Monte Carlo simulation. These results enable one to assess, both graphically and numerically, how unusual the observed residual patterns are in reference to their null distributions. The residual patterns can also be used to determine the nature of model misspecification. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed methods perform well in practical situations. Three medical studies are provided for illustrations.
| S-EPMC3276276 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigh-throughput systems are powerful tools for the life science research community. The complexity and volume of data from these systems, however, demand special treatment. Graphical tools are needed to evaluate many aspects of the data throughout the analysis process because plots can provide quality assessments for thousands of values simultaneously. The utility of a plot, in turn, is contingent on both its interpretability and its efficiency.ResultsThe shivplot, a graphical technique motivated by microarrays but applicable to any replicated high-throughput data set, is described. The plot capitalizes on the strengths of three well-established plotting graphics--a boxplot, a distribution density plot, and a variability vs intensity plot--by effectively combining them into a single representation.ConclusionThe utility of the new display is illustrated with microarray data sets. The proposed graph, retaining all the information of its precursors, conserves space and minimizes redundancy, but also highlights features of the data that would be difficult to appreciate from the individual display components. We recommend the use of the shivplot both for exploratory data analysis and for the communication of experimental data in publications.
| S-EPMC1679802 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:DNA methylation offers an excellent example for elucidating how epigenetic information affects gene expression. ? values and M values are commonly used to quantify DNA methylation. Statistical methods applicable to DNA methylation data analysis span a number of approaches such as Wilcoxon rank sum test, t-test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, permutation test, empirical Bayes method, and bump hunting method. Nonetheless, selection of an optimal statistical method can be challenging when different methods generate inconsistent results from the same data set. RESULTS:We compared six statistical approaches relevant to DNA methylation microarray analysis in terms of false discovery rate control, statistical power, and stability through simulation studies and real data examples. Observable differences were noticed between ? values and M values only when methylation levels were correlated across CpG loci. For small sample size (n=3 or 6 in each group), both the empirical Bayes and bump hunting methods showed appropriate FDR control and the highest power when methylation levels across CpG loci were independent. Only the bump hunting method showed appropriate FDR control and the highest power when methylation levels across CpG sites were correlated. For medium (n=12 in each group) and large sample sizes (n=24 in each group), all methods compared had similar power, except for the permutation test whenever the proportion of differentially methylated loci was low. For all sample sizes, the bump hunting method had the lowest stability in terms of standard deviation of total discoveries whenever the proportion of differentially methylated loci was large. The apparent test power comparisons based on raw p-values from DNA methylation studies on ovarian cancer and rheumatoid arthritis provided results as consistent as those obtained in the simulation studies. Overall, these results provide guidance for optimal statistical methods selection under different scenarios. CONCLUSIONS:For DNA methylation studies with small sample size, the bump hunting method and the empirical Bayes method are recommended when DNA methylation levels across CpG loci are independent, while only the bump hunting method is recommended when DNA methylation levels are correlated across CpG loci. All methods are acceptable for medium or large sample sizes.
| S-EPMC4497424 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Gene networks have generated a massive explosion in the development of high-throughput techniques for monitoring various aspects of gene activity. Networks offer a natural way to model interactions between genes, and extracting gene network information from high-throughput genomic data is an important and difficult task. OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study is to construct a two-way gene network based on parametric and nonparametric correlation coefficients. The first step in constructing a Gene Co-expression Network is to score all pairs of gene vectors. The second step is to select a score threshold and connect all gene pairs whose scores exceed this value. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In the foundation-application study, we constructed two-way gene networks using nonparametric methods, such as Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Blomqvist's measure, and compared them with Pearson's correlation coefficient. We surveyed six genes of venous thrombosis disease, made a matrix entry representing the score for the corresponding gene pair, and obtained two-way interactions using Pearson's correlation, Spearman's rank correlation, and Blomqvist's coefficient. Finally, these methods were compared with Cytoscape, based on BIND, and Gene Ontology, based on molecular function visual methods; R software version 3.2 and Bioconductor were used to perform these methods. RESULTS:Based on the Pearson and Spearman correlations, the results were the same and were confirmed by Cytoscape and GO visual methods; however, Blomqvist's coefficient was not confirmed by visual methods. CONCLUSIONS:Some results of the correlation coefficients are not the same with visualization. The reason may be due to the small number of data.
| S-EPMC5002968 | biostudies-literature