Dataset Information

Comparison of hybridization-based and sequencing-based gene expression technologies on biological replicates.

ABSTRACT:

Background

High-throughput systems for gene expression profiling have been developed and have matured rapidly through the past decade. Broadly, these can be divided into two categories: hybridization-based and sequencing-based approaches. With data from different technologies being accumulated, concerns and challenges are raised about the level of agreement across technologies. As part of an ongoing large-scale cross-platform data comparison framework, we report here a comparison based on identical samples between one-dye DNA microarray platforms and MPSS (Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing).

Results

The DNA microarray platforms generally provided highly correlated data, while moderate correlations between microarrays and MPSS were obtained. Disagreements between the two types of technologies can be attributed to limitations inherent to both technologies. The variation found between pooled biological replicates underlines the importance of exercising caution in identification of differential expression, especially for the purposes of biomarker discovery.

Conclusion

Based on different principles, hybridization-based and sequencing-based technologies should be considered complementary to each other, rather than competitive alternatives for measuring gene expression, and currently, both are important tools for transcriptome profiling.

SUBMITTER: Liu F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1899500 | biostudies-literature | 2007 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of hybridization-based and sequencing-based gene expression technologies on biological replicates.

Liu Fang F Jenssen Tor-Kristian TK Trimarchi Jeff J Punzo Claudio C Cepko Connie L CL Ohno-Machado Lucila L Hovig Eivind E Kuo Winston Patrick WP

BMC genomics 20070607

<h4>Background</h4>High-throughput systems for gene expression profiling have been developed and have matured rapidly through the past decade. Broadly, these can be divided into two categories: hybridization-based and sequencing-based approaches. With data from different technologies being accumulated, concerns and challenges are raised about the level of agreement across technologies. As part of an ongoing large-scale cross-platform data comparison framework, we report here a comparison based o ...[more]

PMID: 17555589

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies offer fast and inexpensive identification of DNA sequences. Somatic sequencing is among the primary applications of NGS, where acquired (non-inherited) variants are based on comparing diseased and healthy tissues from the same individual. Somatic mutations in genetic diseases such as cancer are tightly associated with genomic instability. Genomic instability increases heterogenity, complicating sequencing efforts further, a task already challenged by the presence of short reads and repetitions in human DNA. This leads to low concordance among studies and limits reproducibility. This limitation is a significant problem since identified mutations in somatic sequencing are major biomarkers for diagnosis and the primary input of targeted therapies. Benchmarking studies were conducted to assess the error rates and increase reproducibility. Unfortunately, the number of somatic benchmarking sets is very limited due to difficulties in validating true somatic variants. Moreover, most NGS benchmarking studies are based on relatively simpler germline (inherited) sequencing. Recently, a comprehensive somatic sequencing benchmarking set was published by Sequencing Quality Control Phase 2 (SEQC2). We chose this dataset for our experiments because it is a well-validated, cancer-focused dataset that includes many tumor/normal biological replicates. Our study has two primary goals. First goal is to determine how replicate-based consensus approaches can improve the accuracy of somatic variant detection systems. Second goal is to develop highly predictive machine learning (ML) models by employing replicate-based consensus variants as labels during the training phase.ResultsEnsemble approaches that combine alternative algorithms are relatively common; here, as an alternative, we study the performance enhancement potential of biological replicates. We first developed replicate-based consensus approaches that utilize the biological replicates available in this study to improve variant calling performance. Subsequently, we trained ML models using these biological replicates and achieved performance comparable to optimal ML models, those trained using high-confidence variants identified in advance.ConclusionsOur replicate-based consensus approach can be used to improve variant calling performance and develop efficient ML models. Given the relative ease of obtaining biological replicates, this strategy allows for the development of efficient ML models tailored to specific datasets or scenarios.

Project description:BACKGROUND: We have developed a simulation approach to help determine the optimal mixture of sequencing methods for most complete and cost effective transcriptome sequencing. We compared simulation results for traditional capillary sequencing with "Next Generation" (NG) ultra high-throughput technologies. The simulation model was parameterized using mappings of 130,000 cDNA sequence reads to the Arabidopsis genome (NCBI Accession SRA008180.19). We also generated 454-GS20 sequences and de novo assemblies for the basal eudicot California poppy (Eschscholzia californica) and the magnoliid avocado (Persea americana) using a variety of methods for cDNA synthesis. RESULTS: The Arabidopsis reads tagged more than 15,000 genes, including new splice variants and extended UTR regions. Of the total 134,791 reads (13.8 MB), 119,518 (88.7%) mapped exactly to known exons, while 1,117 (0.8%) mapped to introns, 11,524 (8.6%) spanned annotated intron/exon boundaries, and 3,066 (2.3%) extended beyond the end of annotated UTRs. Sequence-based inference of relative gene expression levels correlated significantly with microarray data. As expected, NG sequencing of normalized libraries tagged more genes than non-normalized libraries, although non-normalized libraries yielded more full-length cDNA sequences. The Arabidopsis data were used to simulate additional rounds of NG and traditional EST sequencing, and various combinations of each. Our simulations suggest a combination of FLX and Solexa sequencing for optimal transcriptome coverage at modest cost. We have also developed ESTcalc http://fgp.huck.psu.edu/NG_Sims/ngsim.pl, an online webtool, which allows users to explore the results of this study by specifying individualized costs and sequencing characteristics. CONCLUSION: NG sequencing technologies are a highly flexible set of platforms that can be scaled to suit different project goals. In terms of sequence coverage alone, the NG sequencing is a dramatic advance over capillary-based sequencing, but NG sequencing also presents significant challenges in assembly and sequence accuracy due to short read lengths, method-specific sequencing errors, and the absence of physical clones. These problems may be overcome by hybrid sequencing strategies using a mixture of sequencing methodologies, by new assemblers, and by sequencing more deeply. Sequencing and microarray outcomes from multiple experiments suggest that our simulator will be useful for guiding NG transcriptome sequencing projects in a wide range of organisms.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Many different microarray experiments are publicly available today. It is natural to ask whether different experiments for the same phenotypic conditions can be combined using meta-analysis, in order to increase the overall sample size. However, some genes are not measured in all experiments, hence they cannot be included or their statistical significance cannot be appropriately estimated in traditional meta-analysis. Nonetheless, these genes, which we refer to as incomplete genes, may also be informative and useful. RESULTS: We propose a meta-analysis framework, called "Incomplete Gene Meta-analysis", which can include incomplete genes by imputing the significance of missing replicates, and computing a meta-score for every gene across all datasets. We demonstrate that the incomplete genes are worthy of being included and our method is able to appropriately estimate their significance in two groups of experiments. We first apply the Incomplete Gene Meta-analysis and several comparable methods to five breast cancer datasets with an identical set of probes. We simulate incomplete genes by randomly removing a subset of probes from each dataset and demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms two other methods in terms of their false discovery rate. We also apply the methods to three gastric cancer datasets for the purpose of discriminating diffuse and intestinal subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis is an effective approach that identifies more robust sets of differentially expressed genes from multiple studies. The incomplete genes that mainly arise from the use of different platforms may also have statistical and biological importance but are ignored or are not appropriately involved by previous studies. Our Incomplete Gene Meta-analysis is able to incorporate the incomplete genes by estimating their significance. The results on both breast and gastric cancer datasets suggest that the highly ranked genes and associated GO terms produced by our method are more significant and biologically meaningful according to the previous literature.

Dataset Information

Comparison of hybridization-based and sequencing-based gene expression technologies on biological replicates.

Background

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparison of hybridization-based and sequencing-based gene expression technologies on biological replicates.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets