Dataset Information

Concurrent genotyping and quantitation of cytomegalovirus gB genotypes in solid-organ-transplant recipients by use of a real-time PCR assay.

ABSTRACT: We have developed a real-time genotyping and quantitative PCR (RT-GQ-PCR) assay to genotype cytomegalovirus (CMV) and quantify viral loads simultaneously in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Special minor-groove DNA-binding probes were designed based on sequence polymorphism in the gB gene to increase genotyping specificity for gB1 to gB4. For validation, 28 samples with known genotypes determined by restriction fragment analysis (RFA) and 121 with unknown genotypes were tested. All samples were from SOT patients with CMV viremia. A 100% concordance for genotyping was achieved by using the RT-GQ-PCR with known genotypes determined by RFA. The RT-GQ-PCR identified more cases of CMV infections with mixed genotypes than RFA did. No cross-reaction between genotypes was observed. All four gB genotypes were detected in the 121 samples of unknown genotype. gB1 was the predominant single genotype (n = 61, 50.4%), followed by gB2 (n = 26, 21.0%), gB3, (n = 11, 9.1%), and gB4 (n = 3, 2.5%). Mixed-genotype infections were detected in 17% (20/121) of the samples. Patients with mixed-genotype infections had significantly higher CMV viral loads than those with single-genotype infections (P = 0.019). The RT-GQ-PCR assay was found to be highly sensitive and specific, with a wide dynamic range (2.7 to 10.7 log(10) copies/ml) and very good precision (coefficient of variation, approximately 1.78%). With the prominent feature of concurrent CMV gB genotyping and quantitation in a single reaction, the new assay provides a rapid and cost-effective method for monitoring CMV infection in SOT recipients.

SUBMITTER: Pang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2593284 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Concurrent genotyping and quantitation of cytomegalovirus gB genotypes in solid-organ-transplant recipients by use of a real-time PCR assay.

Pang Xiaoli X Humar Atul A Preiksaitis Jutta K JK

Journal of clinical microbiology 20081029 12

We have developed a real-time genotyping and quantitative PCR (RT-GQ-PCR) assay to genotype cytomegalovirus (CMV) and quantify viral loads simultaneously in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Special minor-groove DNA-binding probes were designed based on sequence polymorphism in the gB gene to increase genotyping specificity for gB1 to gB4. For validation, 28 samples with known genotypes determined by restriction fragment analysis (RFA) and 121 with unknown genotypes were tested. All sampl ...[more]

PMID: 18971365

Similar Datasets

Project description:Quantitative monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia in venous blood is standard in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) but is limited by the need for phlebotomy facilities and personnel. The aim of the study was to evaluate the Tasso+ capillary blood (CB) self-collection device for quantitation of plasma CMV DNAemia. Thirty adult SOTr with suspected CMV DNAemia were enrolled to have a supervised Tasso+ CB sample collection within 24 h of a venous sample. CMV DNA was quantitated in paired samples by using the Abbott M2000 Real-Time qPCR instrument. The participants were provided with a study-specific survey that measured patient acceptability of the Tasso+ device compared with venipuncture. A Tasso + CB sample was successfully collected in 28/30 (93%) patients, and 44 paired samples were analyzed. Concordance for detection of CMV DNAemia above the limit of detection (LOD) was 91% (42/44), and the Tasso + CB sample was estimated to be 95% sensitive at a viral load (VL) of 308 IU/mL. Among samples with a quantifiable DNAemia result with both methods (N = 31), there was excellent correlation between methods (Spearman R2 = 0.99). The difference in CMV VL between venous and Tasso+ CB samples was not dependent on time (P > 0.1). Of 12 who completed the survey, 11 (92%) expressed a preference for Tasso+ CB collection over venipuncture. Collection of CB with the Tasso+ device is feasible, patient-acceptable, and yields generally comparable CMV DNAemia load to standard venous samples, but with lower sensitivity. Future studies to optimize and evaluate this methodology for patient self-collected samples are warranted.ImportanceWe evaluate an FDA-cleared blood self-collection device (Tasso+) and demonstrate that it is patient-acceptable and yields a liquid blood sample with quantitative CMV DNAemia results comparable to those of standard venipuncture samples. This opens up possibilities for self-blood collection to monitor for CMV and potentially other viruses in transplant and other at-risk populations.

Project description:BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is among the most common viral infections after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Associations of CMV with cancer risk among SOT recipients have been incompletely evaluated.MethodsThe authors used linked data from the US SOT registry and 32 cancer registries. Poisson regression was used to compare cancer incidence across CMV risk groups based on donor (D) and recipient (R) immunoglobulin G (IgG) serostatus: high risk (R-negative/D-positive), moderate risk (R-positive), and low risk (R-negative/D-negative).ResultsIn total, 247,318 SOT recipients were evaluated during 2000-2017 (R-negative/D-positive, 20.3%; R-positive, 62.9%; R-negative/D-negative, 16.8%). CMV-seropositive recipients were older, more racially/ethnically diverse, and had lower socioeconomic status than CMV-seronegative recipients. Compared with R-negative/D-negative recipients, recipients in the R-negative/D-positive and R-positive groups had a lower incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; R-negative/D-positive: adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.91; R-positive: aIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00). CMV serostatus modified the association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status and DLBCL (p = .0006): DLBCL incidence was increased for EBV R-negative/D-positive recipients (aIRR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.50-7.95) among CMV R-negative/D-negative recipients but not among the other CMV risk groups. Compared with recipients who were CMV R-negative/D-negative, those who were R-negative/D-positive had a lower incidence of small intestine cancer (aIRR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63), and R-positive recipients had a higher incidence of lung cancer (aIRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.46). CMV status was not associated with risk for other cancers.ConclusionsCMV status was not associated with risk for most cancers among SOT recipients. The inverse association with DLBCL may reflect the protective effects of CMV prophylaxis or treatment with off-target efficacy against EBV infection (the major cause of lymphoma in SOT recipients).

Dataset Information

Concurrent genotyping and quantitation of cytomegalovirus gB genotypes in solid-organ-transplant recipients by use of a real-time PCR assay.

Publications

Concurrent genotyping and quantitation of cytomegalovirus gB genotypes in solid-organ-transplant recipients by use of a real-time PCR assay.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets