Dataset Information

Pre-docking filter for protein and ligand 3D structures.

ABSTRACT: Virtual drug screening using protein-ligand docking techniques is a time-consuming process, which requires high computational power for binding affinity calculation. There are millions of chemical compounds available for docking. Eliminating compounds that are unlikely to exhibit high binding affinity from the screening set should speed-up the virtual drug screening procedure. We performed docking of 6353 ligands against twenty-one protein X-ray crystal structures. The docked ligands were ranked according to their calculated binding affinities, from which the top five hundred and the bottom five hundred were selected. We found that the volume and number of rotatable bonds of the top five hundred docked ligands are similar to those found in the crystal structures and corresponded with the volume of the binding sites. In contrast, the bottom five hundred set contains ligands that are either too large to enter the binding site, or too small to bind with high specificity and affinity to the binding site. A pre-docking filter that takes into account shapes and volumes of the binding sites as well as ligand volumes and flexibilities can filter out low binding affinity ligands from the screening sets. Thus, the virtual drug screening procedure speed is increased.

SUBMITTER: Wilantho A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2646187 | biostudies-literature | 2008

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pre-docking filter for protein and ligand 3D structures.

Wilantho Alisa A Tongsima Sissades S Jenwitheesuk Ekachai E

Bioinformation 20081231 5

Virtual drug screening using protein-ligand docking techniques is a time-consuming process, which requires high computational power for binding affinity calculation. There are millions of chemical compounds available for docking. Eliminating compounds that are unlikely to exhibit high binding affinity from the screening set should speed-up the virtual drug screening procedure. We performed docking of 6353 ligands against twenty-one protein X-ray crystal structures. The docked ligands were ranked ...[more]

PMID: 19255632

Similar Datasets

Project description:Protein-protein interactions are a pivotal component of many biological processes and mediate a variety of functions. Knowing the tertiary structure of a protein complex is therefore essential for understanding the interaction mechanism. However, experimental techniques to solve the structure of the complex are often found to be difficult. To this end, computational protein-protein docking approaches can provide a useful alternative to address this issue. Prediction of docking conformations relies on methods that effectively capture shape features of the participating proteins while giving due consideration to conformational changes that may occur.We present a novel protein docking algorithm based on the use of 3D Zernike descriptors as regional features of molecular shape. The key motivation of using these descriptors is their invariance to transformation, in addition to a compact representation of local surface shape characteristics. Docking decoys are generated using geometric hashing, which are then ranked by a scoring function that incorporates a buried surface area and a novel geometric complementarity term based on normals associated with the 3D Zernike shape description. Our docking algorithm was tested on both bound and unbound cases in the ZDOCK benchmark 2.0 dataset. In 74% of the bound docking predictions, our method was able to find a near-native solution (interface C-alphaRMSD < or = 2.5 A) within the top 1000 ranks. For unbound docking, among the 60 complexes for which our algorithm returned at least one hit, 60% of the cases were ranked within the top 2000. Comparison with existing shape-based docking algorithms shows that our method has a better performance than the others in unbound docking while remaining competitive for bound docking cases.We show for the first time that the 3D Zernike descriptors are adept in capturing shape complementarity at the protein-protein interface and useful for protein docking prediction. Rigorous benchmark studies show that our docking approach has a superior performance compared to existing methods.

Project description:A database consisting of 780 ligand-receptor complexes, termed SB2010, has been derived from the Protein Databank to evaluate the accuracy of docking protocols for regenerating bound ligand conformations. The goal is to provide easily accessible community resources for development of improved procedures to aid virtual screening for ligands with a wide range of flexibilities. Three core experiments using the program DOCK, which employ rigid (RGD), fixed anchor (FAD), and flexible (FLX) protocols, were used to gauge performance by several different metrics: (1) global results, (2) ligand flexibility, (3) protein family, and (4) cross-docking. Global spectrum plots of successes and failures vs rmsd reveal well-defined inflection regions, which suggest the commonly used 2 Å criteria is a reasonable choice for defining success. Across all 780 systems, success tracks with the relative difficulty of the calculations: RGD (82.3%) > FAD (78.1%) > FLX (63.8%). In general, failures due to scoring strongly outweigh those due to sampling. Subsets of SB2010 grouped by ligand flexibility (7-or-less, 8-to-15, and 15-plus rotatable bonds) reveal that success degrades linearly for FAD and FLX protocols, in contrast to RGD, which remains constant. Despite the challenges associated with FLX anchor orientation and on-the-fly flexible growth, success rates for the 7-or-less (74.5%) and, in particular, the 8-to-15 (55.2%) subset are encouraging. Poorer results for the very flexible 15-plus set (39.3%) indicate substantial room for improvement. Family-based success appears largely independent of ligand flexibility, suggesting a strong dependence on the binding site environment. For example, zinc-containing proteins are generally problematic, despite moderately flexible ligands. Finally, representative cross-docking examples, for carbonic anhydrase, thermolysin, and neuraminidase families, show the utility of family-based analysis for rapid identification of particularly good or bad docking trends, and the type of failures involved (scoring/sampling), which will likely be of interest to researchers making specific receptor choices for virtual screening. SB2010 is available for download at http://rizzolab.org .

Dataset Information

Pre-docking filter for protein and ligand 3D structures.

Publications

Pre-docking filter for protein and ligand 3D structures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets