Dataset Information

Genotypic detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by DNA sequencing: a randomized trial.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a growing international health concern. It is the biggest killer among the infectious diseases in the world today. Early detection of drug resistance allows starting of an appropriate treatment. Resistance to drugs is due to particular genomic mutations in specific genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis(MTB). The aim of this study was to identify the presence of Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin(RIF) drug resistance in new and previously treated tuberculosis (TB) cases using DNA sequencing. METHODS: This study was carried out on 153 tuberculous patients with positive Bactec 460 culture for acid fast bacilli. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients, 105 (68.6%) were new cases and 48 (31.4%) were previously treated cases. Drug susceptibility testing on Bactec revealed 50 resistant cases for one or more of the first line antituberculous. Genotypic analysis was done only for rifampicin resistant specimens (23 cases) and INH resistant specimens (26 cases) to detect mutations responsible for drug resistance by PCR amplification of rpoB gene for rifampicin resistant cases and KatG gene for isoniazid resistant cases. Finally, DNA sequencing was done for detection of mutation within rpoB and KatG genes. Genotypic analysis of RIF resistant cases revealed that 20/23 cases (86.9%) of RIF resistance were having rpoB gene mutation versus 3 cases (13.1%) having no mutation with a high statistical significant difference between them (P < 0.001). Direct sequencing of Kat G gene revealed point mutation in 24/26 (92.3%) and the remaining 2/26 (7.7%) had wild type KatG i.e. no evidence of mutation with a high statistical significant difference between them (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We can conclude that rifampicin resistance could be used as a useful surrogate marker for estimation of multidrug resistance. In addition, Genotypic method was superior to that of the traditional phenotypic method which is time-consuming taking several weeks or longer.

SUBMITTER: Abdelaal A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2654859 | biostudies-literature | 2009

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genotypic detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by DNA sequencing: a randomized trial.

Abdelaal Amina A El-Ghaffar Hassan Abd HA Zaghloul Mohammad Hosam Eldeen MH El Mashad Noha N Badran Ehab E Fathy Amal A

Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials 20090130

<h4>Background</h4>Tuberculosis is a growing international health concern. It is the biggest killer among the infectious diseases in the world today. Early detection of drug resistance allows starting of an appropriate treatment. Resistance to drugs is due to particular genomic mutations in specific genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis(MTB). The aim of this study was to identify the presence of Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin(RIF) drug resistance in new and previously treated tuberculosis (TB) cas ...[more]

PMID: 19183459

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAccurate drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is essential for proper patient management. We investigated discordance between genotypic (Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus) and phenotypic (MGIT 960) methods for the detection of rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistant MTB and its correlation with patient treatment outcomes in Jimma, Southwest Oromia, Ethiopia.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 57 stored MTB isolates with known Xpert RIF resistance status (45 RIF resistant and 12 RIF susceptible) at Jimma University Mycobacteriology Research Center from November 2, 2021, to December 28, 2022. We did MTBDRplus and phenotypic DST (using the Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system). The Xpert and MTBDRplus results were compared using phenotypic DST as a reference standard method. The treatment outcome was determined as per national guideline. The discordance between the genotypic and phenotypic DST was calculated using GraphPad software.ResultsAmong the 57 MTB isolates, six (10.5 %) had discordant results between the two DST methods. Xpert yielded five discordant results for RIF when compared with phenotypic DST (kappa coefficient (κ) = 0.76, 95 % confidence interval 0.56-0.96). The MTBDRplus compared with phenotypic DST gave three discordant results for RIF (κ = 0.86, 95 % confidence interval 0.71-1.00) and three for INH (κ = 0.86, 95 % confidence interval 0.70-1.00). Compared with Xpert, MTBDRplus yielded lower discordance with phenotypic DST for RIF. Out of six patients with discordant results, three had unfavorable outcomes while the other three were cured. Of the three patients with unfavorable outcomes, only one patient has received an inappropriate treatment regimen. There was no correlation between unfavorable outcomes and incorrect treatment regimens due to discordant results (Χ2 = 0.404; P = 0.525).ConclusionsDiscordance between genotypic and phenotypic DST for RIF or INH occurred in 10.5 % of isolates. Only one patient with discordant results has received an inappropriate treatment regimen, resulting in an unfavorable outcome. The impact of parallel use of rapid molecular assay with phenotypic DST on patient treatment outcomes requires further study.

Dataset Information

Genotypic detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by DNA sequencing: a randomized trial.

Publications

Genotypic detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by DNA sequencing: a randomized trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets