Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Combined measurement of fasting plasma glucose and A1C is effective for the prediction of type 2 diabetes: the Kansai Healthcare Study.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

We prospectively assessed whether the combined measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and A1C were effective for predicting type 2 diabetes.

Research design and methods

Study participants included 6,736 nondiabetic Japanese men aged 40-55 years. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed in those who had an FPG >or=126 mg/dl or who were being treated with an oral antidiabetic agent or insulin. The models including FPG, A1C, and both were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

Results

During the 4-year follow-up period, we confirmed 659 diabetes cases. In multivariate analysis, both FPG and A1C were independently associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes. The model including both FPG and A1C had a greater AUROC curve than that including FPG alone (0.853 vs. 0.818; P < 0.001) or A1C alone (0.853 vs. 0.771; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The combined measurement of FPG and A1C was effective for predicting type 2 diabetes.

SUBMITTER: Sato KK 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2660452 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Combined measurement of fasting plasma glucose and A1C is effective for the prediction of type 2 diabetes: the Kansai Healthcare Study.

Sato Kyoko Kogawa KK   Hayashi Tomoshige T   Harita Nobuko N   Yoneda Takeshi T   Nakamura Yoshiko Y   Endo Ginji G   Kambe Hiroshi H  

Diabetes care 20090108 4


<h4>Objective</h4>We prospectively assessed whether the combined measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and A1C were effective for predicting type 2 diabetes.<h4>Research design and methods</h4>Study participants included 6,736 nondiabetic Japanese men aged 40-55 years. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed in those who had an FPG >or=126 mg/dl or who were being treated with an oral antidiabetic agent or insulin. The models including FPG, A1C, and both were compared using the area under the receiv  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3879764 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3853138 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7656954 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2797994 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3308289 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5474498 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8089013 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10320917 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4302255 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3114342 | biostudies-literature