Dataset Information

In vivo comparison of the relative systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate from three anti-static spacers and a metered dose inhaler.

ABSTRACT: WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Conventional spacers help overcome problems with co-ordination and may improve lung deposition and decrease oropharyngeal impaction. Antistatic spacers eliminate electrostatic charge and may hence improve respirable dose delivery. The systemic bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate is primarily dependent on delivery by the pulmonary route and hence the performance of antistatic spacers can be evaluated using adrenal suppression as a sensitive surrogate for relative bioavailability to the lung after an inhalation. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study compares the relative bioavailability to the lung of inhaled fluticasone delivered via conventional pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) and three antistatic spacers (plastic Zerostat-V, plastic Aerochamber Max, and metal Nebuchamber) in patients with asthma. All three antistatic spacers when compared with pMDI significantly increased the relative bioavailability to the lungs of inhaled fluticasone in terms of relative adrenal suppression, and there were no significant differences between the plastic and metal antistatic spacers. AIMS: The systemic bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) depends primarily on lung absorption and can be quantified by measuring suppression of overnight and early morning urinary cortisol/creatinine (OUCC and EMUCC, respectively). The aim of the study was to determine the relative bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) FP to the lungs via anti-static plastic (Zerostat-V and Aerochamber Max), metal (Nebuchamber) anti-static spacers and metered dose inhaler [Flixotide Evohaler (EH) (pMDI)]. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-way crossover design was used. Eighteen mild to moderate asthmatics received single doses of placebo/HFA-FP 2 mg via the 280-ml Zerostat-V (ZS); 250-ml Nebuchamber (NC); 197-ml Aerochamber Max (AC); and pMDI (EH). Measurements of OUCC and EMUCC were made at baseline and 10 h after each dose. RESULTS: Significant suppression of OUCC and EMUCC occurred from baseline with all three spacers, but not Evohaler (geometric mean fold suppression, 95% confidence interval): ZS, 2.74 (1.75, 4.30), P < 0.001; NC, 3.31 (1.81, 6.06), P < 0.001; AC, 4.98 (3.39, 7.31), P < 0.001; and for EH this was 1.42 (0.92, 2.21), P= 0.169 (equating to a 64, 70, 80 and 30% fall in OUCC via the ZS, NC, AC and EH devices, respectively). There were significant differences between all three spacers vs. EH. When compared with the Evohaler, the Zerostat V resulted in 48% greater suppression (P= 0.009); the Nebuchamber 57% greater suppression (P= 0.001); and the Aerochamber Max 71% greater suppression of OUCC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All three antistatic spacers significantly increased the relative systemic bioavailability of HFA-FP compared with the standard pMDI. --EudraCT Database trial registration number: 2005-005557-22.

SUBMITTER: Nair A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2670376 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

In vivo comparison of the relative systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate from three anti-static spacers and a metered dose inhaler.

Nair Arun A Menzies Daniel D Hopkinson Pippa P McFarlane Lesley L Lipworth Brian J BJ

British journal of clinical pharmacology 20090209 2

<h4>What is already known about this subject</h4>Conventional spacers help overcome problems with co-ordination and may improve lung deposition and decrease oropharyngeal impaction. Antistatic spacers eliminate electrostatic charge and may hence improve respirable dose delivery. The systemic bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate is primarily dependent on delivery by the pulmonary route and hence the performance of antistatic spacers can be evaluated using adrenal suppression as a sen ...[more]

PMID: 19220273

Similar Datasets

Project description:RationaleThe most effective approach to teaching respiratory inhaler technique is unknown.ObjectivesTo evaluate the relative effects of two different educational strategies (teach-to-goal instruction vs. brief verbal instruction) in adults hospitalized with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.MethodsWe conducted a randomized clinical trial at two urban academic hospitals. Participants received teach-to-goal or brief instruction in the hospital and were followed for 90 days after discharge. Inhaler technique was assessed using standardized checklists; misuse was defined as 75% steps or less correct (≤9 of 12 steps). The primary outcome was metered-dose inhaler misuse 30 days postdischarge. Secondary outcomes included Diskus technique; acute care events at 30 and 90 days; and associations with adherence, health literacy, site, and patient risk (near-fatal event).Measurements and main resultsOf 120 participants, 73% were female and 90% were African American. Before education, metered-dose inhaler misuse was similarly common in the teach-to-goal and brief intervention groups (92% vs. 84%, respectively; P = 0.2). Metered-dose inhaler misuse was not significantly less common in the teach-to-goal group than in the brief instruction group at 30 days (54% vs. 70%, respectively; P = 0.11), but it was immediately after education (11% vs. 60%, respectively; P < 0.001) and at 90 days (48% vs. 76%, respectively; P = 0.003). Similar results were found with the Diskus device. Participants did not differ across education groups with regard to rescue metered-dose inhaler use or Diskus device adherence at 30 or 90 days. Acute care events were less common among teach-to-goal participants than brief intervention participants at 30 days (17% vs. 36%, respectively; P = 0.02), but not at 90 days (34% vs. 38%, respectively; P = 0.6). Participants with low health literacy receiving teach-to-goal instruction were less likely than brief instruction participants to report acute care events within 30 days (15% vs. 70%, respectively; P = 0.008). No differences existed by site or patient risk at 30 or 90 days (P > 0.05).ConclusionsIn adults hospitalized with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in-hospital teach-to-goal instruction in inhaler technique did not reduce inhaler misuse at 30 days, but it was associated with fewer acute care events within 30 days after discharge. Inpatient treatment-to-goal education may be an important first step toward improving self-management and health outcomes for hospitalized patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, especially among patients with lower levels of health literacy. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01426581).

Project description:BackgroundThe effectiveness of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in delivering medication to the lungs highly depends on its correct usage technique. Current guidelines state optimal technique for high lung deposition should include a slow inhalation (>5 seconds) at an inspiratory flow rate of 30 L/min and inhaler actuation at the start of inhalation. However, these recommendations were based on clinical studies using CFC (chlorofluorocarbon)-MDIs and in vitro studies of HFA (hydrofluoroalkane)-MDIs using idealized MDI techniques of uniform inhalation and actuation, disregarding the nonuniform techniques of actual patients.MethodsTo better understand the effects of time-varying MDI usage parameters on lung deposition of aerosol delivered by an HFA-MDI, we conducted an in vitro study modeled on real-life variable inspiratory flow and actuation techniques recorded from 15 subjects with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We developed a model representing the time-varying inspiratory flow waveforms and actuation timings based on 43 MDI techniques recorded from patients. Furthermore, we constructed an in vitro experimental setup using a mouth-throat cast, programmable MDI actuator, and breath simulator to evaluate lung deposition for the MDI techniques derived from our model.ResultsHigh inspiratory flow rates, 60-90 L/min, consistently resulted in high in vitro lung deposition (>40%) of aerosol (albuterol delivered from Ventolin HFA-MDI) compared to 30 L/min when MDI actuation occurred in the first half of inhalation. Also, positive coordination resulted in higher in vitro lung deposition compared with negative or zero coordination (actuating before or at the start of inspiration). Furthermore, variation in coordination affected lung deposition more significantly (23%) than flow rate or duration of inspiration (≤5%).ConclusionsIn an in vitro experimental model based on inhalation data from patients with asthma and COPD, we demonstrated that aerosol lung deposition emitted from Ventolin HFA-MDI is most optimal for MDI actuation in the first half of inspiration at high flow rates (60-90 L/min).

Dataset Information

In vivo comparison of the relative systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate from three anti-static spacers and a metered dose inhaler.

Publications

In vivo comparison of the relative systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate from three anti-static spacers and a metered dose inhaler.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets