Dataset Information

Reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of scoliosis research society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The SRS-22 is a valid instrument for the assessment of the health related quality of life of patients with Idiopathic scoliosis. The SRS-22 questionnaire was developed in USA and has been widely used in the English speaking countries. Recently it has been translated and validated in many other languages. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of the refined Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire.

Methods

Following the steps of cross - cultural adaptation the adapted Greek version of the SRS-22 questionnaire and a validated Greek version of the SF-36 questionnaire were mailed to 68 patients treated surgically for Idiopathic Scoliosis. 51 out of the 68 patients returned the 1st set of questionnaires, while a second set was emailed to 30 randomly selected patients of the first time responders. 20 out of the 30 patients returned the 2nd set. The mean age at the time of operation was 16,2 years and the mean age at the time of evaluation was 21,2 years. Descriptive statistics for content analysis were calculated. Reliability assessment was determined by estimating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) respectively. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing SRS-22 domains with relevant domains in the SF-36 questionnaire using Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (r).

Results

The calculated Cronbach's alpha of internal consistency for three of the corresponding domains (pain 0.85; mental health 0.87; self image 0.83) were very satisfactory and for two domains (function/activity 0.72 and satisfaction 0.67) were good. The ICC of all domains of SRS-22 questionnaire was high (ICC>0.70), demonstrating very satisfactory or excellent test/retest reproducibility. Considering concurrent validity all correlations were found to be statistically significant at the 0.01 level among related domains and generally demonstrated high correlation coefficient.

Conclusion

The adapted Greek version of the SRS-22 questionnaire is valid and reliable and can be used for the assessment of the outcome of the treatment of the Greek speaking patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

SUBMITTER: Antonarakos PD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2720382 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of scoliosis research society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

Antonarakos Petros D PD Katranitsa Labrini L Angelis Lefteris L Paganas Aristofanis A Koen Errikos M EM Christodoulou Evangelos A EA Christodoulou Anastasios G AG

Scoliosis 20090716

<h4>Background</h4>The SRS-22 is a valid instrument for the assessment of the health related quality of life of patients with Idiopathic scoliosis. The SRS-22 questionnaire was developed in USA and has been widely used in the English speaking countries. Recently it has been translated and validated in many other languages. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of the refined Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire.<h4>Methods</h4>F ...[more]

PMID: 19607720

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study designOutcome investigation to verify the internal consistency, reproducibility and validity of the adapted Chinese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with idiopathic scoliosis.ObjectiveTo develop this questionnaire for the outcome measurement in treating Chinese adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and evaluate its metric qualities. The SRS-22 questionnaire has proven to be a valid instrument for clinical assessment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis and has been successfully translated into Spanish and Turkish. In most developing countries, however, quality of life and psychological health have been poorly described when treating children with idiopathic scoliosis.MethodsTrans-cultural adaptation of the SRS-22 questionnaire was carried out according to the International Quality of Life Assessment Project guidelines. The final version was approved by a committee of experts. The questionnaire was completed by 86 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who had been treated with a brace; this included 11 males and 75 females, aged from 10 to 18 years (mean 13.9 years). Curve magnitude ranged from 25 degrees to 45 degrees (mean 35.6 degrees ). A subgroup of 30 patients completed the questionnaire again in 3 or 4 weeks.ResultsFive common factors were acquired from factorial analysis, and the cumulative contribution ratio was 67.66%. The overall alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.88. Coefficients for individual domains were as follows: function/activity, 0.70; pain, 0.80; self-image, 0.80; mental health, 0.88; and satisfaction, 0.81. The questionnaire as a whole had a test-retest correlation coefficient of 0.97. Test-retest correlation coefficients for individual domains were as follows: function, 0.85; pain, 0.96; self-image, 0.96; mental health, 0.95; and satisfaction, 0.91.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the SRS-22 questionnaire is eligible in terms of reliability and validity, and can be used to measure HRQoL for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in Mainland China.

Project description:BackgroundThe International Physical Actvity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is a validated tool for physical activity assessment used in many countries however no Arabic version of the long-form of this questionnaire exists to this date. Hence, the aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate an Arabic version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (AIPAQ) equivalent to the French version (F-IPAQ) in a Lebanese population.MethodsThe guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation provided by the World Health Organization and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire committee were followed. One hundred fifty-nine students and staff members from Saint Joseph University of Beirut were randomly recruited to participate in the study. Items of the A-IPAQ were compared to those from the F-IPAQ for concurrent validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Content validity of the questionnaire was assessed using factor analysis for the A-IPAQ's items. The physical activity indicators derived from the A-IPAQ were compared with the body mass index (BMI) of the participants for construct validity. The instrument was also evaluated for internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Finally, thirty-one participants were asked to complete the A-IPAQ on two occasions three weeks apart to examine its test-retest reliability. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the extent of agreement between the two versions of the questionnaire and its repeated administrations.ResultsA high correlation was observed between answers of the F-IPAQ and those of the A-IPAQ, with Spearman's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 1.00 (p < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed a high level of agreement between the two versions with all values scattered around the mean for total physical activity (mean difference = 5.3 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = -145.2 to 155.8). Negative correlations were observed between MET values and BMI, independent of age, gender or university campus. The A-IPAQ showed a high internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.769-1.00 (p < 0.001) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.625-0.999 (p < 0.001), except for a moderate agreement with the moderate garden/yard activity (alpha = 0.682; ICC = 0.518; p < 0.001). The A-IPAQ had moderate-to-good test-retest reliability for most of its items (ICC ranging from 0.66-0.96; p < 0.001) and the Bland-Altman analysis showed a satisfactory agreement between the two administrations of the A-IPAQ for total physical activity (mean difference = 99.8 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = -1105.3; 1304.9) and total vigorous and moderate physical activity (mean difference = -29.7 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = -777.6; 718.2).ConclusionThe modified Arabic version of the IPAQ showed acceptable validity and reliability for the assessment of physical activity among Lebanese adults. More studies are necessary in the future to assess its validity compared to a gold-standard criterion measure.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is a complex pathology that covers a variety of etiologies, with onset before the age of 10 years. Surgical treatment of EOS should have the objectives of fulfilling maximum pulmonary function, spine length, with minimal hospitalizations, complications, and family burden. Radiographic parameters are an important standard in assessing treatment outcomes. However, the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire-24 (EOSQ-24) was developed to measure the wider dimensions of outcomes involving the quality of life of patients and caregivers post-treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of culturally adapted Arabic version of the EOSQ-24. METHODS:Translation and cross-cultural adaptation, based on published guidelines, were performed on the original English EOSQ-24 by a committee. The Arabic version of EOSQ-24 was applied to the caregivers of all 58 EOS patients who were treated surgically after signing a consent form. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's ? and item-total statistics for the whole questionnaire initially and for the each domain separately. Data quality was assessed by mean, median, percentage of missing data, ceiling and floor effects. Discriminative validity was examined using non parametric tests. RESULTS:The response for all items was excellent with only 1.7% (0-1) of responses missing. The floor effect ranged from 0% to 36.2% of patients and the ceiling effect ranged from 0 to 46.6%. Cronbach's ? test reliability was found excellent (0.919), as was the internal consistency of all domains, with Cronbach ? ranging from 0.903 to 0.918. Corrected item-total correlations were good for all domains (>0.3). Only one item (Question 21) showed low corrected item-total correlations (r = 0.222). However, Cronbach's ? did not increase significantly when this item was deleted (0.920). CONCLUSION:The first adapted Arabic version of EOSQ-24 is found to have good validity and reliability, and it can be used to assess children in Arab societies with EOS.

Project description:BackgroundThe Early-Onset Scoliosis Self-Report Questionnaire (EOSQ-SELF) is a novel self-report instrument to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients, as a complementary HRQoL assessment tool for the proxy-repot 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). This study aimed to translate and adapt the EOSQ-SELF into a Chinese version and evaluate its reliability and validity in EOS patients.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed from July 2022 to September 2022. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with EOS were recruited. Forwards-backwards translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original EOSQ-SELF were performed. The Chinese EOSQ-SELF was administered and collected twice through social media, with a 2 weeks interval. Reliability was evaluated by using internal consistency, and test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of data between the two time points. A Delphi survey in the expert committee was used to investigate the content validity. SRS-22r, PedsQL4.0, and EQ-5D-Y scales were used to assess the criterion-related validity. Nonparametric tests and multiple linear regression were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability.ResultsA total of 101 valid responses from EOS patients were received. The mean age was 12.08±2.19 years, and 53.47% were female. The mean Cobb angle was 60.56°±19.48°. Floor effects of 0.00% to 7.92% and ceiling effects of 0.00% to 52.48% were observed. Excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese EOSQ-SELF was observed, with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.942, McDonald's ω coefficient of 0.940, and ICC of 0.930. All domains of the Chinese EOSQ-SELF were significantly correlated with SRS-22r (0.709 to 0.878), PedsQL4.0 (0.568 to 0.718), and EQ-5D-Y (-0.598 to -0.625), depicting excellent criterion-related validity. Discriminative ability was validated in aetiology (P<0.001), severity of spinal deformity (P<0.001), treatment status (P<0.001), and ambulatory ability (P<0.001).ConclusionsThe Chinese EOSQ-SELF is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of self-report HRQoL in patients aged 8 to 18 years with EOS. It can be easily applied in clinical settings and for research purposes, as a complementary tool for the proxy-report EOSQ-24.

Dataset Information

Reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of scoliosis research society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of scoliosis research society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets