Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Little evidence exists to guide treatment of alopecia areata (AA). The current practices in treatment of children compared to adults and of progressive stages of hair loss are unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the current practices of southeastern United States dermatologists for the treatment of AA.Methods
Dermatologists were sent anonymous questionnaires regarding their treatment practices by mail. Respondents' frequencies of treatment in children compared to adults and in patchy hair loss compared to widespread hair loss were compared with Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests and Friedman tests. As a secondary source, the National Alopecia Areata Registry (NAAR) database was analyzed for patients' treatment histories.Results
Survey results suggested that dermatologists recommend treatment less frequently for children than adults and for more advanced hair loss. NAAR data confirmed that offering no treatment for AA is relatively common.Conclusion
Dermatologists' treatment of AA is inconsistent. A stronger evidence base will provide more consistent treatment options.
SUBMITTER: Mukherjee N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2789708 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Mukherjee Niyati N Morrell Dean S DS Duvic Madeleine M Stewart Paul W PW Goldsmith Lowell A LA
BMC dermatology 20091112
<h4>Background</h4>Little evidence exists to guide treatment of alopecia areata (AA). The current practices in treatment of children compared to adults and of progressive stages of hair loss are unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the current practices of southeastern United States dermatologists for the treatment of AA.<h4>Methods</h4>Dermatologists were sent anonymous questionnaires regarding their treatment practices by mail. Respondents' frequencies of treatment in children c ...[more]