Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
There is a need to develop robust and clinically applicable gene expression signatures. Hypoxia is a key factor promoting solid tumour progression and resistance to therapy; a hypoxia signature has the potential to be not only prognostic but also to predict benefit from particular interventions.Methods
An approach for deriving signatures that combine knowledge of gene function and analysis of in vivo co-expression patterns was used to define a common hypoxia signature from three head and neck and five breast cancer studies. Previously validated hypoxia-regulated genes (seeds) were used to generate hypoxia co-expression cancer networks.Results
A common hypoxia signature, or metagene, was derived by selecting genes that were consistently co-expressed with the hypoxia seeds in multiple cancers. This was highly enriched for hypoxia-regulated pathways, and prognostic in multivariate analyses. Genes with the highest connectivity were also the most prognostic, and a reduced metagene consisting of a small number of top-ranked genes, including VEGFA, SLC2A1 and PGAM1, outperformed both a larger signature and reported signatures in independent data sets of head and neck, breast and lung cancers.Conclusion
Combined knowledge of multiple genes' function from in vitro experiments together with meta-analysis of multiple cancers can deliver compact and robust signatures suitable for clinical application.
SUBMITTER: Buffa FM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2816644 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Removal of the proliferation component of gene expression by proliferating cell nuclearantigen (PCNA) adjustment via statistical methods has been addressed in numerous survivalprediction studies for breast cancer and all cancers in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Thesestudies indicate that the removal of proliferation in gene expression by PCNA adjustment removesthe statistical significance for predicting overall survival (OS) when gene selection is performed ona genome-wide basis. Since cancers become addicted to DNA repair as a result of forced cellularreplication, increased oxidation, and repair deficiencies from oncogenic loss or geneticpolymorphisms, we hypothesized that PCNA adjustment of DNA repair gene expression does notremove statistical significance for OS prediction. The rationale and importance of this translationalhypothesis is that new lists of repair genes which are predictive of OS can be identified to establishnew targets for inhibition therapy. A candidate gene approach was employed using TCGARNA-Seq data for 121 DNA repair genes in 8 molecular pathways to predict OS for 18 cancers.Statistical randomization test results indicate that after PCNA adjustment, OS could be predictedsignificantly by sets of DNA repair genes for 61% (11/18) of the cancers. These findings suggest thatremoval of the proliferation signal in expression by PCNA adjustment does not remove statisticalsignificance for predicting OS. In conclusion, it is likely that previous studies on PCNA adjustmentand survival were biased because genes identified through a genome-wide approach are stronglyco-regulated by proliferation.
| S-EPMC6520950 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality of cancer increase remarkably every year. It's a heavy burden for family and society. The detection of prognostic biomarkers can help to improve the theraputic effect and prolong the lifetime of patients. microRNAs have an influential role in cancer prognosis. The results of articles discussing the relationship between microRNA polymorphisms and cancer prognosis are inconsistent. METHODS: We conduct a meta-analysis of 19 publications concerning the association of four common polymorphisms, mir-146a rs2910164, mir-149 rs2292832, mir-196a2 rs11614913 and mir-499 rs3746444, with cancer prognosis. Pooled Hazard Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals for the relationship between four genetic polymorphisms and Overall Survival, Recurrence-free Survival, Disease-free survival, recurrence are calculated. Subgroup analysis by population and type of tumor are conducted. RESULTS: GG genotype of mir-146a may be the protective factor for overall survival, especially in Caucasian population. C-containing genotypes of mir-196a2 act as a risk role for overall survival. The same result exists in Asian population, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and digestive cancer. The patients with C allele of mir-149 have a better overall survival, especially in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. No significant results are obtained for mir-499 polymorphisms. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic polymorphisms in mir-146a, mir-196a2 and mir-149 may be associated with overall survival. This effect varies with different types of cancer. Genetic polymorphism in mir-499 may have nothing to do with cancer prognosis.
| S-EPMC4206268 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Previous studies showed that microRNA-214 (miR-214) may act as a prognostic biomarker of cancer. However, the available evidence is controversial. This study summarizes evidence and evaluates the prognostic role of miR-214 in various cancers. We carried out a systematic literature review and assessed the quality of included studies based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival/progressive free survival/recurrence free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS) were calculated to measure the effective value of miR-214 expression on prognosis. Thirteen studies were included in pooled analysis. We found that miR-214 was significantly correlated with OS (HR=2.21, 95%CI: 1.33-3.68, P=0.00), no significant difference was found with DFS/PFS/RFS (HR=1.73, 95%CI: 0.78-3.83, P=0.18) in various carcinomas. In subgroup analysis, higher expression of miR-214 was significantly associated with poor OS in Asians (HR=2.27, 95%CI: 1.09-4.73, P=0.00) and Caucasians (HR=2.04, 95%CI: 1.47-3.30, P=0.00). On the contrary, high miR-214 expression significantly predicted favorable DFS/PFS/RFS (HR=0.50, 95%CI: 0.31-0.82, P=0.00) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) group. Our data indicates that high miR-214 could be a promising biomarker for prognosis prediction of cancer. However, further clinical studies are needed for the current insufficient relevant data.
| S-EPMC5650425 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Recently, many studies explored the role of inflammation parameters such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the prognosis of urinary cancers, but the results were not consistent. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of published studies to assess the prognostic value of NLR in patients with urinary cancers. Hazard ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association of NLR and OS and RFS/CSS. RESULTS: The pooled results showed that high NLR was a poor predictor for OS with HR of 1.81 (95%CI: 1.48-2.21; Pheterogeneity?=?0.005) and RFS/CSS (HR?=?2.07, 95% CI: 1.65-2.6; Pheterogeneity?=?0.849). Subgroup analyses revealed that high NLR yielded a worse OS in RCC (HR?=?1.9, 95%CI: 1.47-2.45; Pheterogeneity?=?0.003) and a poor RFS/CSS in RCC (HR?=?1.83, 95%CI: 1.35-2.48; Pheterogeneity?=?0.709), bladder cancer (HR?=?2.2, 95%CI: 1.27-3.8; Pheterogeneity?=?0.447) and urothelial carcinoma (HR?=?2.58, 95%CI: 1.66-4.01; Pheterogeneity?=?0.784). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that NLR could act as a significant biomarker in the prognosis of urinary cancers.
| S-EPMC3958449 | biostudies-other
Project description:Advances in transcriptomics have impacted the way of looking atimproved our understanding of leukemic development and helped enhancing the stratification of patients. Analyses of individual cohortsTranscriptomics studies often combined AML samples regardless of cytogenetic abnormalities. , which would lead to bias in Hence, deregulated genesdifferential gene expression analysis that may result from the differential representation of in less frequent AML subgroups have low weight, contrarily to those in abundant subgroups. We, thusHence, we performed a horizontal meta-analysis that integrated transcriptomic data of AML from multicentric multiple studies to enrich the less frequent cytogenetic subgroups and to uncover common genes involved in AML development and response to therapy. A total of 28 Affymetrix microarray datasets harboring 3940 AML samples were downloaded from the GEO database. After stringent quality control, transcriptomics data of 1523 samples from 11 datasets, covering 10 AML cytogenetic subgroups, were retained and merged with the transcriptomic data of 198 healthy bone marrow samples. Differentially expressed genes between each cytogenetic subgroup and normal samples were extracted, allowing the unbiased identification of 330 commonly deregulated genes (CODEGs)., which CODEGs showed enriched expression profiles in myeloid differentiation, leukemic stem cell status and relapse. Most of these genes were downregulated, in accordance with DNA hypermethylation. CODEGS were then used to create a prognostic score based on the weighted sum of expression of 22 core genes (CODEG22). The score was validated in on microarray data of five independent cohorts, and by qRT-PCR in a cohort of 142 samples, by qRT-PCR. CODEG22 stratified patients globally, as well as in subpopulations of cytologically normal and elderly patients. , and hence, couldSo, it may complement the European LeukemiaNet classification for a more accurate prediction of AML outcomes.
2020-10-29 | GSE147515 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundRecently, more and more studies investigated the association of inflammation parameters such as the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and the prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of PLR in cancer remains controversial.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the prognostic value of PLR in various cancers. In order to investigate the association between PLR and overall survival (OS), the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.ResultsA total of 13,964 patients from 26 studies were included in the analysis. The summary results showed that elevated PLR was a negative predictor for OS with HR of 1.60 (95%CI: 1.35-1.90; Pheterogeneity <0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that increased PLR was a negative prognostic marker in patients with gastric cancer (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.80-2.25, Pheterogeneity = 0.011), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.33-2.05, Pheterogeneity = 0.995), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 3.07, 95% CI: 2.04-4.62, Pheterogeneity = 0.133), ovarian cancer (HR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.07-2.31, Pheterogeneity = 0.641) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.42-2.41, Pheterogeneity = 0.451) except for pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.92-1.09, Pheterogeneity = 0.388).ConclusionThe meta-analysis demonstrated that PLR could act as a significant biomarker in the prognosis of various cancers.
| S-EPMC4072728 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recent evidence indicates that miR-17-92 family might be an essential prognostic biomarker for human cancers. However, results are still inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive role of miR-17-92 family in human cancer prognosis. We searched literatures published before March 31th, 2017 inPubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases. Twenty six studies were included in our analyses. The overall hazard ratios (HRs) showed that high expression level of miR-17-92 family was a predictor of poor overall survival (OS): adjusted HRs = 1.71, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.39-2.11, p < 0.00001, and poor disease-free survival (DFS): adjusted HRs = 2.29, 95% CIs: 1.41-3.72, p = 0.0008. However, no association between miR-17-92 family expression and cancer progress-free survival (PFS) was found (p > 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that high expression of miR-17-92 family was associated with poor OS (adjusted HRs = 1.89, 95% CIs: 1.43-2.49, p < 0.00001) and DFS (adjusted HRs = 2.83, 95% CIs: 1.59-5.04, p = 0.0003) among the Asian, and no association was found for the Caucasian (p > 0.05). Besides, the HRs of miR-17-92 family high expression in tissue and serum samples was 1.68 (1.35-2.09) and 2.20 (1.08-4.46) for OS, and 1.73 (0.80-3.74) and 3.37 (2.25-5.02) for DFS. It also found that high expression of miR-17-92 family predicted a poor OS in breast cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, lymphoma and other cancers. Findings suggest that miR-17-92 family can be an effective predictor for prognosis prediction in cancer patients.
| S-EPMC5620325 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionLymphocyte infiltration (LI) is often seen in breast cancer but its importance remains controversial. A positive correlation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification and LI has been described, which was associated with a more favorable outcome. However, specific lymphocytes might also promote tumor progression by shifting the cytokine milieu in the tumor.MethodsAffymetrix HG-U133A microarray data of 1,781 primary breast cancer samples from 12 datasets were included. The correlation of immune system-related metagenes with different immune cells, clinical parameters, and survival was analyzed.ResultsA large cluster of nearly 600 genes with functions in immune cells was consistently obtained in all datasets. Seven robust metagenes from this cluster can act as surrogate markers for the amount of different immune cell types in the breast cancer sample. An IgG metagene as a marker for B cells had no significant prognostic value. In contrast, a strong positive prognostic value for the T-cell surrogate marker (lymphocyte-specific kinase (LCK) metagene) was observed among all estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors and those ER-positive tumors with a HER2 overexpression. Moreover ER-negative tumors with high expression of both IgG and LCK metagenes seem to respond better to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.ConclusionsPrecise definitions of the specific subtypes of immune cells in the tumor can be accomplished from microarray data. These surrogate markers define subgroups of tumors with different prognosis. Importantly, all known prognostic gene signatures uniformly assign poor prognosis to all ER-negative tumors. In contrast, the LCK metagene actually separates the ER-negative group into better or worse prognosis.
| S-EPMC2688939 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThis meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types.MethodsElectronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS).Results12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59-2.80, I 2 = 0%, P < 0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08-2.74, I 2 = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61-3.64, I 2 = 55%, P < 0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50-3.55, I 2 = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93-3.14, I 2 = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68-1.08, I 2 = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64-1.81, I 2 = 55%, P=0.79).ConclusionOur findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China.
| S-EPMC8560271 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recently, there are more and more evidences from studies have revealed the association between microRNA-9 (miR-9) expression and outcome in multiple cancers, but inconsistent results have also been reported. It is necessary to rationalize a meta analysis of all available data to clarify the prognostic role of miR-9. Eligible studies were selected through multiple search strategies and the quality was assessed by MOOSE. Data was extracted from studies according to the key statistics index. All analyses were performed using STATA software. Twenty studies were selected in the meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic role of miR-9 in multiple tumors. MiR-9 expression level was an independent prognostic biomarker for OS in tumor patients using multivariate and univariate analyses. High expression levels of miR-9 was demonstrated to associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.56-3.17, P < 0.05) and recurrence free survival/progress free survival (RFS/PFS) (HR = 2.08, 95 % CI: 1.33-3.27, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that residence region (China and Japan), sample size, cancer type (solid or leukemia), follow-up months and analysis method (qPCR) did not alter the predictive value of miR-9 on OS in various cancers. Furthermore, no significant associations were detected for miR-9 expression and lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. The present results suggest that promoted miR-9 expression is associated with poor OS in patients with general cancers.
| S-EPMC5487937 | biostudies-literature