Dataset Information

Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT: This phase III open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of enzastaurin versus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (WHO grade 4).Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 6-week cycles of enzastaurin 500 mg/d (1,125-mg loading dose, day 1) or lomustine (100 to 130 mg/m(2), day 1). Assuming a 45% improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), 397 patients were required to provide 80% power to achieve statistical significance at a one-sided level of .025.Enrollment was terminated at 266 patients (enzastaurin, n = 174; lomustine, n = 92) after a planned interim analysis for futility. Patient characteristics were balanced between arms. Median PFS (1.5 v 1.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.70), overall survival (6.6 v 7.1 months; HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.65), and 6-month PFS rate (P = .13) did not differ significantly between enzastaurin and lomustine, respectively. Stable disease occurred in 38.5% and 35.9% of patients and objective response occurred in 2.9% and 4.3% of patients, respectively. Time to deterioration of physical and functional well-being and symptoms did not differ between arms (HR = 1.12; P = .54). Four patients discontinued enzastaurin because of drug-related serious adverse events (AEs). Eleven patients treated with enzastaurin died on study (four because of AEs; one was drug-related). All four deaths that occurred in patients receiving lomustine were disease-related. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were significantly higher with lomustine (46 events) than with enzastaurin (one event; P < or = .001).Enzastaurin was well tolerated and had a better hematologic toxicity profile but did not have superior efficacy compared with lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

SUBMITTER: Wick W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2834468 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

Wick Wolfgang W Puduvalli Vinay K VK Chamberlain Marc C MC van den Bent Martin J MJ Carpentier Antoine F AF Cher Lawrence M LM Mason Warren W Weller Michael M Hong Shengyan S Musib Luna L Liepa Astra M AM Thornton Donald E DE Fine Howard A HA

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20100201 7

<h4>Purpose</h4>This phase III open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of enzastaurin versus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (WHO grade 4).<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 6-week cycles of enzastaurin 500 mg/d (1,125-mg loading dose, day 1) or lomustine (100 to 130 mg/m(2), day 1). Assuming a 45% improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), 397 patients were required to provide 80% power to achieve statistical significance ...[more]

PMID: 20124186

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe combination of galunisertib, a transforming growth factor (TGF)-? receptor (R)1 kinase inhibitor, and lomustine was found to have antitumor activity in murine models of glioblastoma.MethodsGalunisertib (300 mg/day) was given orally 14 days on/14 days off (intermittent dosing). Lomustine was given as approved. Patients were randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to galunisertib + lomustine, galunisertib monotherapy, or placebo + lomustine. The primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and antitumor activity.ResultsOne hundred fifty-eight patients were randomized: galunisertib + lomustine (N = 79), galunisertib (N = 39), and placebo + lomustine (N = 40). Baseline characteristics were: male (64.6%), white (75.3%), median age 58 years, ECOG performance status (PS) 1 (63.3%), and primary glioblastoma (93.7%). The PKs of galunisertib were not altered with lomustine, and galunisertib had a median half-life of ?8 hours. Median OS in months (95% credible interval [CrI]) for galunisertib + lomustine was 6.7 (range: 5.3-8.5), 8.0 (range: 5.7-11.7) for galunisertib alone, and 7.5 (range: 5.6-10.3) for placebo + lomustine. There was no difference in OS for patients treated with galunisertib + lomustine compared with placebo + lomustine [P (HR < 1) = 26%]. Median progression-free survival of ?2 months was observed in all 3 arms. Among 8 patients with IDH1 mutation, 7 patients were treated with galunisertib (monotherapy or with lomustine); OS ranged from 4 to 17 months. Patients treated with galunisertib alone had fewer drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events (n = 34) compared with lomustine-treated patients (10% vs 26%). Baseline PS, post-discontinuation of bevacizumab, tumor size, and baseline levels of MDC/CCL22 were correlated with OS.ConclusionsGalunisertib + lomustine failed to demonstrate improved OS relative to placebo + lomustine. Efficacy outcomes were similar in all 3 arms.Clinical trial registrationNCT01582269, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Project description:Abstract Background Treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma are limited and with the possible exception of regorafenib, no agent has demonstrated superior activity to lomustine. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more effective treatment strategies for recurrent glioblastoma. Here, we investigated different treatment combinations based on the tumor-stroma targeting antibody-cytokine fusion protein L19TNF in preclinical glioma models and translated the most effective treatment combination to patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Material and Methods Orthotopic immunocompetent mouse glioma models were used to study the anti-glioma activity of L19TNF in combination with anti-PD1, bevacizumab or lomustine. Tumor growth was monitored by MRI. Flow cytometry and microscopy were used to characterize tumor-infiltrating-immune cells. MHC immunoaffinity purification and mass spectrometry were used to characterize the MHC immunopeptidome. Genetic mouse models were used to study immune-dependent effects. Subsequently, we translated the most efficient treatment combination to patients with recurrent glioblastoma within a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT04573192). Results The combination of L19TNF and lomustine demonstrated strong synergistic anti-tumor activity in two immunocompetent orthotopic glioma models and cured a majority of tumor-bearing mice. In contrast, combinations with anti-PD-1 or bevacizumab had only limited anti-glioma activity. Furthermore, compared to the monotherapies, the combination of L19TNF and lomustine led to the strongest increase in tumor-infiltrating lymphoid cells as demonstrated by flow cytometry and microsopy and to the highest number of peptides presented in the context of MHC-I. The treatment effect was abrograted in different genetic immunodeficient mouse models. The treatment combination of L19TNF and lomustine was well tolerated in the first patients treated within a phase I/II clinical trial and we observed partial tumor responses also in patients with an unmethylated MGMT promoter. Conclusion The combination of L19TNF and lomustine demonstrated promising anti-glioma activity and patients are currently recruited within a phase I/II clinical trial for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Dataset Information

Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

Publications

Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets