Dataset Information

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To determine the effect on mortality of rescuscitation with colloid solutions compared with resuscitation with crystalloids. DESIGN:Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of resuscitation with colloids compared with crystalloids for volume replacement of critically ill patients; analysis stratified according to patient type and quality of allocation concealment. SUBJECTS:37 randomised controlled trials were eligible, of which 26 unconfounded trials compared colloids with crystalloids (n = 1622). (The 10 trials that compared colloid in hypertonic crystalloid with isotonic crystalloid (n = 1422) and one trial that compared colloid in isotonic crystalloid with hypertonic crystalloid (n = 38) are described in the longer version on our website www.bmj.com). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Mortality from all causes at end of follow up for each trial. RESULTS:Resuscitation with colloids was associated with an increased absolute risk of mortality of 4% (95% confidence interval 0% to 8%), or four extra deaths for every 100 patients resuscitated. The summary effect measure shifted towards increased mortality with colloids when only trials with adequate concealment of allocation were included. There was no evidence for differences in effect among patients with different types of injury that required fluid resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review does not support the continued use of colloids for volume replacement in critically ill patients.

SUBMITTER: Schierhout G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC28497 | biostudies-literature | 1998 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials.

Schierhout G G Roberts I I

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 19980301 7136

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the effect on mortality of rescuscitation with colloid solutions compared with resuscitation with crystalloids.<h4>Design</h4>Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of resuscitation with colloids compared with crystalloids for volume replacement of critically ill patients; analysis stratified according to patient type and quality of allocation concealment.<h4>Subjects</h4>37 randomised controlled trials were eligible, of which 26 unconfounded trials comp ...[more]

PMID: 9550953

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntravenous crystalloid solutions are administered commonly for critically ill patients. We performed this meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate effects of chloride content of intravenous crystalloid solutions on clinical outcomes among critically ill adult patients.MethodsElectronic databases were searched up to June 1, 2018, for randomized trials of use of balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline solutions in critically ill adult patients. The outcome variables included mortality, renal outcomes, serum content alterations and organ function. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to patient settings, types or volume of crystalloid fluid, or among sepsis versus non-sepsis, TBI versus non-TBI or subpopulations by the categories of baseline kidney function. Random errors were evaluated by trial sequential analysis.ResultsEight studies with 19,301 patients were analyzed. A trend of in-hospital survival benefit with no statistical difference could be observed with balanced crystalloids compared with 0.9% saline (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.0, p = 0.06). The use of balanced crystalloid solutions was associated with longer RRT-free days (SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.06-0.12, p < 0.001), less risk of increase in serum concentrations of chloride (SMD - 1.23, 95% CI - 1.59 to - 0.87, p < 0.001) and sodium (SMD - 1.28, 95% CI - 1.65 to - 0.92, p < 0.001), less risk of decline in serum base deficit (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.98 to - 0.18, p = 0.004), longer ventilator-free days (SMD 0.08, 95% CI 0.05-0.11, p < 0.001) and vasopressor-free days (SMD 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.07, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that balanced crystalloid solutions were associated with a reduced in-hospital mortality rate among septic patients (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98; p = 0.02) and non-traumatic brain injury patients (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, p = 0.02), while the TSA results indicated a larger sample size is still in need.ConclusionsLimited evidence supported statistical survival benefit with balanced crystalloid solutions, while it benefited in reducing organ support duration and fluctuations in serum electrolyte and base excess and was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in subpopulation with sepsis and non-TBI. Large-scale rigorous randomized trials with better designs are needed to provide robust evidence for clinical management. Trial registration The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42018102661), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails.

Project description:ObjectiveTo summarize the evidence comparing various balanced crystalloid solutions.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, and CENTRAL databases.Study selectionWe included randomized controlled trials that directly compared the IV administration of one balanced crystalloid solution with another.Data extraction and analysisWe examined metabolic and patient-important outcomes and conducted meta-analysis using random effects model. For comparisons or outcomes with insufficient data to allow for pooling, we describe results narratively. We assessed risk of bias for individual trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology.Data synthesisWe included 24 randomized controlled trials comparing Plasmalyte, Ringer's Lactate, Ringerfundin, Hartmann's solution, Ringer's Bicarbonate, Sterofundin, Kabilyte, Normosol, and novel balanced solutions. Of the included studies, 16 were performed in the perioperative setting, six in the ICU, one in the emergency department, and one in healthy volunteers. Administration of Plasmalyte resulted in a lower postinfusion serum chloride concentration (mean difference, 0.83 mmol/L lower; 95% CI, 0.03-1.64 mmol/L lower, low certainty), higher postinfusion base excess (mean difference, 0.65 mmol/L higher, 95% CI, 0.25-1.05 mmol/L higher, low certainty), and lower postinfusion serum lactate levels (mean difference, 0.46 mmol/L lower; 95% CI, 0.05-0.87 mmol/L lower, low certainty) compared with administration of any other balanced crystalloid. There were no important differences in postinfusion serum pH or potassium when comparing Plasmalyte with other balanced crystalloids. Data addressing other comparisons or examining the impact of different balanced crystalloids on patient-important outcomes were sparsely reported and too heterogeneous to allow for pooling.ConclusionsAdministration of Plasmalyte results in lower serum concentrations of chloride and lactate, and higher base excess than other balanced crystalloids. The certainty of evidence is low and requires further study in large randomized controlled trials to inform the choice of balanced crystalloid in patients requiring volume replacement.

Project description:A meta-analysis concerning perioperative coagulation competence, hemorrhage, and outcome was conducted including the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HESs), dextran, or albumin versus administration of a crystalloid as control to assess the efficacy and safety of colloids and crystalloids for fluid administration during major elective surgery. Surgery was restricted to cardiovascular and noncardiovascular surgery, and HESs were stratified to HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5.We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, conference proceedings, reference lists, and databases of ongoing trials.Thirty one primary clinical randomized controlled trials included 2287 patients undergoing major surgery from January 2000 to August 2015. The perioperative changes in coagulation competence were measured by thromboelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude (MA) in 9 studies administering crystalloids versus HES and in 4 studies administering albumin versus HES. All studies but 1 disclosed increased reduction in TEG-MA following HES administration (P?=?0.0001 and 0.0002). The total loss of blood was reported in 17 studies in which crystalloids were compared to HES and 12 studies reported increased blood loss after administration of HES (P?<?0.003). When administering albumin versus HES, 6 studies reported reduced hemorrhage associated with albumin administration (P?=?0.005). Reoperation was not significantly reduced by the use of crystalloids, but may be more frequent after HESs compared to albumin (P?<?0.03). In this analysis, more patients admitted to administration of HESs were exposed to decrease coagulation competence, compared to perioperative crystalloids and albumin administration.This stratified meta-analysis showed that increased blood loss was found in noncardiovascular surgery among patients receiving HES compared with crystalloids, followed by a marked reduction in TEG-MA, and infusion of 3rd-generation HES products did not influence the results significantly.

Dataset Information

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials.

Publications

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets