Dataset Information

Ca(2+) signalling by P2Y receptors in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

P2Y receptors evoke Ca(2+) signals in vascular smooth muscle cells and regulate contraction and proliferation, but the roles of the different P2Y receptor subtypes are incompletely resolved.

Experimental approach

Quantitative PCR was used to define expression of mRNA encoding P2Y receptor subtypes in freshly isolated and cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells (ASMC). Fluorescent indicators in combination with selective ligands were used to measure the changes in cytosolic free [Ca(2+)] in cultured ASMC evoked by each P2Y receptor subtype.

Key results

The mRNA for all rat P2Y receptor subtypes are expressed at various levels in cultured ASMC. Four P2Y receptor subtypes (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4 and P2Y6) evoke Ca(2+) signals that require activation of phospholipase C and comprise both release of Ca(2+) from stores and Ca(2+) entry across the plasma membrane.

Conclusions and implications

Combining analysis of P2Y receptor expression with functional analyses using selective agonists and antagonists, we isolated the Ca(2+) signals evoked in ASMC by activation of P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4 and P2Y6 receptors.

SUBMITTER: Govindan S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2913105 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe investigated the role of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) in the spatiotemporal control of intracellular cAMP concentrations in rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RASMCs).Methodology/principal findingsThe rank order of PDE families contributing to global cAMP-PDE activity was PDE4> PDE3 ?=? PDE1. PDE7 mRNA expression but not activity was confirmed. The Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based cAMP sensor, Epac1-camps, was used to monitor the time course of cytosolic cAMP changes. A pulse application of the ?-adrenoceptor (?-AR) agonist isoproterenol (Iso) induced a transient FRET signal. Both ?(1)- and ?(2)-AR antagonists decreased the signal amplitude without affecting its kinetics. The non-selective PDE inhibitor (IBMX) dramatically increased the amplitude and delayed the recovery phase of Iso response, in agreement with a role of PDEs in degrading cAMP produced by Iso. Whereas PDE1, PDE3 and PDE7 blockades [with MIMX, cilostamide (Cil) and BRL 50481 (BRL), respectively] had no or minor effect on Iso response, PDE4 inhibition [with Ro-20-1724 (Ro)] strongly increased its amplitude and delayed its recovery. When Ro was applied concomitantly with MIMX or Cil (but not with BRL), the Iso response was drastically further prolonged. PDE4 inhibition similarly prolonged both ?(1)- and ?(2)-AR-mediated responses. When a membrane-targeted FRET sensor was used, PDE3 and PDE4 acted in a synergistic manner to hydrolyze the submembrane cAMP produced either at baseline or after ?-AR stimulation.Conclusion/significanceOur study underlines the importance of cAMP-PDEs in the dynamic control of intracellular cAMP signals in RASMCs, and demonstrates the prominent role of PDE4 in limiting ?-AR responses. PDE4 inhibition unmasks an effect of PDE1 and PDE3 on cytosolic cAMP hydrolyzis, and acts synergistically with PDE3 inhibition at the submembrane compartment. This suggests that mixed PDE4/PDE1 or PDE4/PDE3 inhibitors would be attractive to potentiate cAMP-related functions in vascular cells.